Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016478
Original file (20140016478 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  16 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140016478 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests he be granted a medical retirement.

2.  The applicant states – 

* he was injured on active duty
* he developed sarcoidosis of the lungs while on active duty 
* the Army did not advise him of his eligibility for full disability compensation

3.  The applicant provides copies of –

* a 21 August 20001 private statement with 15 pages of private medical records
* a computer disc (CD) containing copies of his service medical records and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Army from 26 November 1965 through 24 September 1968 with service in Vietnam from 9 June 1966 through 10 November 1967.

3.  The available records show the applicant sustained a gunshot wound (GSW) to his left thigh on 16 January 1967, received treatment, and was returned to duty without complication.

4.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty under the early separation program to attend civilian police training or employment.  He had 2 years, 9 months, and 28 days of creditable service with no lost time.

5.  The service medical records show that on 20 September 1967, in concert with an application for flight school, the applicant had x-ray findings consistent with sarcoidosis or old pulmonary fibrosis.  A second x-ray, taken on 26 September 1967, confirmed the findings.  There are no available records of treatment for this condition while on active duty.

6.  WebMD describes sarcoidosis as:

A disease involving abnormal collections of inflammatory cells (granulomas) that can form as nodules in multiple organs.  The granulomas are most often located in the lungs or its associated lymph nodes, but any organ can be affected.  Sarcoidosis seems to be caused by an immune reaction to an infection or some other trigger (an antigen) that continues even after the initial infection or other antigen is cleared from the body.  In most cases it clears up by itself without any medical intervention, but some cases go on to affect the person long-term or become life-threatening and require medical intervention, most often with medications.  Most persons (>75%) require only symptomatic treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen or aspirin.

7.  His 21 August 1968 separation examination recorded no complaints or findings of any abnormalities.

8.  A 19 September 1969 flight physical examination recorded no complaints or findings of any abnormalities.  The applicant's civilian job was shown as a police helicopter pilot.
9.  On 4 November 1978, the applicant completed a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment medical examination that recorded no complaints or finding of any abnormalities.  He was found to be qualified for induction.

10.  The private medical records indicate treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis commencing in January 1988 and terminating in 1999.

11.  The applicant applied for VA disability benefits on 11 May 2000 claiming service connection for –

* irritable bowel syndrome 
* hypertension
* elevated cholesterol 
* Agent Orange exposure
* post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) 
* pulmonary sarcoidosis with mild restrictive defect 
* residuals of a GSW to his thigh

12.  He was granted VA service connected disability ratings for three conditions with a denial of the other four conditions.  His disability award is as follows –

* PTSD -100 percent 
* pulmonary sarcoidosis - 30 percent 
* residuals of a GSW to the left thigh - 10 percent 

13.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) provides the following:

   a.  Disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform the duties assigned because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service.  
   
   b.  When a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, their continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that they were unable to perform their duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Subsequent to the initial diagnosis for sarcoidosis the applicant underwent at least three military medical examinations wherein he neither reported any problems nor were any disqualifying conditions found.

2.  While the applicant was diagnosed with sarcoidosis while on active duty, there were no indications that the condition had a negative impact on the performance of his assigned duties.  In fact, it appears that he was in a flight status while serving in the USAR subsequent to his release from active duty.

3.  The earliest available reported findings of health problems arising from his sarcoidosis are not until 1988, 20 years after his release from active duty.  

4.  The earliest recorded date of a diagnosis of PTSD is in 2000.  While the traumatic events that led to this condition may have been events occurring during his period of active duty, there is no available evidence that this condition exhibited itself until well after his release from active duty.

5.  The applicant sustained a GSW to his thigh on 16 January 1967.  However, the applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any evidence that the residuals of this wound resulted in a negative impact on his continuation of his duties while on active duty.

6.  The award of VA compensation does not mandate disability retirement or separation from the Army.  The VA, operating under its own policies and regulations, may make a determination that a medical condition warrants compensation.  The VA is not required to determine fitness for duty at the time of separation.  The Army must find a member physically unfit before they can be medically retired or separated.

7.  The applicant was treated for a GSW and diagnosed with sarcoidosis while he was on active duty.  However, at the time of his discharge he was performing his assigned duties in a satisfactory manner and he appears to have continued to perform his duties post-active duty in the USAR.  Therefore, his service is not shown to have been interrupted by any of his physical conditions.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140016478



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140016478



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02007

    Original file (PD-2014-02007.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20080804 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The rating was based on clinical records that documented in October 2011 the CI reported pain and inflammation, and the VA respiratory examination in June 2012 that documented continued complaints of fatigue and intermittent chest...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01892

    Original file (BC-2004-01892.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01892 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 DEC 2005 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reinstated on active duty in order to undergo a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) for sarcoidosis. There is no evidence she was symptomatic from sarcoidosis and no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01387

    Original file (PD-2013-01387.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    (2).It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Posttraumatic Arthritis, Left Knee, Secondary to Gunshot Wound (GSW)501010%Residual of GSW to the Left Knee withTraumatic Arthritis and Partial Left Saphenous andSural Nerve Injuries531130%20050627Scars, Residual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01887

    Original file (PD-2013-01887.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The thigh condition, characterized as “chronic left thigh pain secondary to abundant callus and quadriceps adhesion” and “saphenous nerve palsy (sensory) after gunshot wound,” were the only two conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left thigh pain secondary to abundant callus and quadriceps adhesion” and “saphenous nerve palsy (sensory) after gunshot wound to left thigh” as unfitting, rated 0% and 0%, respectively,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00502

    Original file (PD2011-00502.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the GSW to the right thigh condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The VA rated this exam as 5314 at 30%. The crucial difference in rating was the selection of disability codes; the military coded the CI’s thigh GSW based on a knee ROM disability code of 5261 for non-compensable decreased knee extension; however, the VA rated the CI under disability code 5314 for muscle injury.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | pd2009-00563

    Original file (pd2009-00563.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record. I recommend coding and rating 8599-8520 at 40% as an accurate rating of the CI's left lower extremity disability.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02461

    Original file (PD-2013-02461.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-02461BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE BOARD DATE: 20140724 SEPARATION DATE: 20050914 The next higher rating of 30% requires FEV-1 of 56% to 70% or FEV-1/FVC of 56%to 70% on PFT; or daily inhalational or oral bronchodilator therapy; or inhalational anti-inflammatory (steroid) medication.The VA coded the lung condition analogous to chronic bronchitisas 6600 rated at 30% citing an FEV-1 of 60% from the PFT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101035C070208

    Original file (04101035C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB concluded that the applicant suffered from schizophreniform disorder, sarcoidosis and seborrheic dermatitis and referred the applicant to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). There were no Department of Veterans Affairs records available to the Board or provided by the applicant. The evidence shows that he concurred with the findings and recommendation of his PEB in 1988 which resulted in his permanent disability retirement with a combined Army disability rating of 40 percent.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00123

    Original file (PD2010-00123.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since no evidence of functional impairment exists in this case, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on nerve impairment. The CI was given a P2/L3 profile for LBP, sarcoidosis and plantar fasciitis in July 2005. The VA C&P examination post-separation noted that there was some tenderness over the right foot calcaneous, without limitation of motion along with normal right and left foot x-rays.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01313

    Original file (PD2012 01313.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sarcoidosis 2. A 10% disability rating was assigned based on the 9434 code and a“mild social and industrial impairment.”The CI appealed and both a FPEB and USAPDA affirmed the 10% disability rating.In December 2001, the VA determined that both sarcoidosis and depression had EPTS and neither had been aggravated by service. SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130012146 (PD201201313)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense...