Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014926
Original file (20140014926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140014926 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests entitlement to transfer his educational benefits to his daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was not informed that he was required to transfer his education benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his eligible dependents prior to his retirement from the Army.  He contends that even if he had been aware of the requirement, he was so busy prior to his discharge that he may not have had time to do so.  Neither he nor his daughter should be penalized.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 February 2007 and he was discharged due to disability with severance pay on 27 March 2011.

3.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he completed 4 years, 1 month, and 14 days of active service and 
7 years, 6 months, and 25 days of inactive service.

4.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (Service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

5.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide counseling on Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service prior to separation or release from active duty and document accordingly.

6.  During the implementation phase of the program (the first 90 days), many Soldiers were unaware of the requirements for transferring Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits.  The Army, DOD, and VA initiated a massive public campaign that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and transfer of benefits.

7.  Requests for TEB to eligible dependents must be submitted through a Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) web application.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His request to correct his record to show he was eligible to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits has been carefully considered.  However, the governing law is very specific regarding the transfer of benefits.

2.  Information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill was widely available when the applicant was medically discharged approximately 20 months after the implementation of the program, and, as part of his separation processing, he was required to receive counseling on his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.  He has not provided any documentary evidence indicating he was improperly counseled or that he was never counseled.

3.  The available evidence shows he was eligible to apply for TEB at any time from 1 August 2009 until his medical discharge on 27 March 2011 (although he may have incurred an additional service obligation).  There is no evidence that he followed the established procedure by submitting an application through the DMDC TEB web application while he was on active duty.  This was a well-established and well-publicized procedure, and it remains the only way to apply for TEB.

4.  In the absence of evidence indicating the applicant was unfairly deprived of the opportunity to apply for TEB prior to being discharged, there is an insufficient basis upon which to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x ____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________x____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014926





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014926



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008021

    Original file (20120008021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was uninformed that education benefits must be transferred to dependents before they reached 23 years of age * his oldest child, his daughter Natasha, reached 23 years of age on 13 January 2012 * he attempted to transfer his benefits to her on 12 April 2012 * Natasha was displayed on the Post-9/11 GI Bill website, yet labeled ineligible * information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill website states dependents can use transferred benefits between 18 and 26 years of age * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009399

    Original file (20140009399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of educational benefits to his or her dependent on or after 1 August 2009. b. c. A Soldier may only transfer benefits to eligible family members. The applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his family members under the TEB provision of the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve while he was still a member of the Selected Reserve, but there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021380

    Original file (20130021380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130021380 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible individuals include members of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of their request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, are eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: b. have at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agree to serve 4 additional years in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013646

    Original file (20120013646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A Soldier must initially request to transfer benefits on the DOD TEB online database. However, there is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence which shows he attempted to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents other than his daughter (Michelle)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002051

    Original file (20150002051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer educational benefits to his wife under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement. His records are void of and he failed to provide any documentary evidence showing he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits prior to his retirement or evidence indicating he was improperly counseled. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016484

    Original file (20130016484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he transferred his Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his children prior to his retirement. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of the FSM's record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. In the absence of evidence indicating the FSM was unfairly deprived of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001461

    Original file (20140001461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no additional evidence. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. In the absence of evidence indicating the applicant was unfairly deprived of the opportunity to apply for TEB prior to retiring, there is an insufficient basis upon which to grant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002094

    Original file (20150002094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * while still on active duty, he elected to transfer his education benefits received under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his wife and daughter * due to the phasing of the transferability of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, he had to serve one additional year from the date of his election; the period was one year because, at the time of his election, he had 19 years of service * he used the MILCONNECT website to transfer his education benefits in the Fall of 2009 (MILCONNECT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002926

    Original file (20150002926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was aware of the 1 August deadline to submit the request to transfer benefits to his daughter and was under the impression that he had completed all required actions. He served for 30 years and just wants to transfer education benefits to his daughter. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002356

    Original file (20120002356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * he submitted the transfer of benefits on 8 June 2011 via the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) TEB website and upon submission, the website indicated his submission was in accordance with the instructions; therefore, he did not print a copy of his submission * after waiting for several months, he was informed by the TEB that there was no record of his submission; he contacted multiple agencies in an effort to...