Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016484
Original file (20130016484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	  2 Ju1y 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130016484 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he transferred his Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his children prior to his retirement.

2.  The FSM states he requested transfer of education benefits (TEB) to his children prior to his retirement, but his record was not updated to show this transfer.  During his outprocessing at Fort Benning, GA, he received guidance from education counselors on TEB.  Counselors walked him through each step, and once the process was completed, the counselors said he was "good to go."  He kept checking to make sure, but he did not receive confirmation.  Now the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs say he did not transfer benefits to his children. His survivor benefits election was made the same day.  This went through, but the TEB did not.

3.  The applicant provides a General Power of Attorney and the FSM's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 23 November 1982, the FSM enlisted in the Regular Army.  On 28 February 2011, he retired after completing 28 years, 3 months, and 8 days of active military service.

2.  During the processing of this case, a U.S. Army Human Resources Command staff member reviewed the TEB website and found no evidence that the FSM had submitted a TEB request prior to his retirement.

3.  Department of Defense (DOD) Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003, dated 22 June 2009, established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.
	
	a.  Eligible individuals include members of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of their request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, are eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and:

	b.  have at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agree to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	c.  have at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, are precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agree to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	d.  were or became retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  (A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.)  For those individuals who had an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, no additional service was required.  For those individuals eligible for retirement:

* on or after 1 August 2009 and before 1 August 2010, 1 year of additional service was required
* on or after 1 August 2010 and before 1 August 2011, 2 years of additional service was required
* on or after 1 August 2011 and before 1 August 2012, 3 years of additional service was required

4.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide counseling on Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service prior to separation or release from active duty and document accordingly.

5.  During the implementation phase of the program (the first 90 days), many Soldiers were unaware of the requirements for transferring Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits.  The Army, DOD, and VA initiated a massive public campaign that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and transfer of benefits.

6.  Requests for TEB to eligible dependents must be submitted through a Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) web application.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of the FSM's record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents.

2.  Information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill was widely available when the FSM retired more than a year after the implementation phase had ended, and, as part of his retirement processing, he was required to receive counseling on his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.  He has not provided any documentary evidence indicating he was improperly counseled.  

3.  He could have applied for TEB at any time from 1 August 2009 until his retirement on 28 February 2011.  There is no evidence that he followed the established procedure by submitting an application through the DMDC TEB web application while he was on active duty.  This was a well-established and well-publicized procedure, and it remains the only way to apply for TEB.  

4.  In the absence of evidence indicating the FSM was unfairly deprived of the opportunity to apply for TEB prior to retiring, there is an insufficient basis upon which to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016484





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016484



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005774

    Original file (20140005774.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of his records to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001461

    Original file (20140001461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no additional evidence. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. In the absence of evidence indicating the applicant was unfairly deprived of the opportunity to apply for TEB prior to retiring, there is an insufficient basis upon which to grant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014926

    Original file (20140014926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests entitlement to transfer his educational benefits to his daughter under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. His request to correct his record to show he was eligible to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits has been carefully considered. The available evidence shows he was eligible to apply for TEB at any time from 1 August 2009 until his medical discharge on 27 March 2011 (although he may have incurred an additional service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002051

    Original file (20150002051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer educational benefits to his wife under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement. His records are void of and he failed to provide any documentary evidence showing he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits prior to his retirement or evidence indicating he was improperly counseled. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002356

    Original file (20120002356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * he submitted the transfer of benefits on 8 June 2011 via the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) TEB website and upon submission, the website indicated his submission was in accordance with the instructions; therefore, he did not print a copy of his submission * after waiting for several months, he was informed by the TEB that there was no record of his submission; he contacted multiple agencies in an effort to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019543

    Original file (20110019543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval of transfer of educational benefits (TEB) under the Post 9/11 GI Bill to his dependents. He is not eligible to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. Therefore, the applicant was not in an active status on 1 August 2009 and is not eligible to transfer his education benefits to his family members under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021380

    Original file (20130021380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130021380 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible individuals include members of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of their request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, are eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: b. have at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agree to serve 4 additional years in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020961

    Original file (20140020961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer educational benefits to his children under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children. Although it is unclear when the applicant was transferred to the USAR Control Group...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005689

    Original file (20130005689.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant entered active duty on 15 January 1985. The advisory official recommends disapproval of his request because the applicant has submitted no evidence to show he attempted to transfer his educational benefits to his family members (other than son – Jack) prior to leaving active duty or that he was given false information by a reliable source about the rules for TEB. The evidence of record shows the applicant retired 3 years after the implementation of the program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009399

    Original file (20140009399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of educational benefits to his or her dependent on or after 1 August 2009. b. c. A Soldier may only transfer benefits to eligible family members. The applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his family members under the TEB provision of the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve while he was still a member of the Selected Reserve, but there is...