IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 9 April 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140011765
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, addition of three compression fractures in the vertebrae/thoracic area to his unfitting conditions and an increase in his disability rating.
2. The applicant states:
a. His 20-percent disability rating is incorrect.
b. The disability rating from the physical evaluation board (PEB) did not include three compression fractures in the vertebrae/thoracic area.
c. He had complained about pain in that area of his back for over a year and the fractures were discovered during his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) physical examination conducted in August 2011 prior to his discharge. The PEB refused to accept this new information although it was completed before he was discharged.
3. The applicant provides:
* VA discharge physical
* DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings)
* DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings)
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Having prior enlisted service in the Army National Guard and the U.S. Navy, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 February 2009 for 3 years and 8 weeks. He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13F (fire support specialist).
2. In November 2010, an MEB diagnosed him with mild diffuse degenerative disease of the cervical spine with myofascial components and chronic sprain and injury to right lateral ankle ligaments resulting in instability of the ankle. The MEB found the following conditions medically acceptable:
* obstructive sleep apnea
* history of premature supraventricualr tachycardia, status post ablation with resolution of all symptoms
* chronic dyspepsia, status post Nissen fundoplication with negative recent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
* history hypertension, controllable with medications
* chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, on medications
* degenerative disc disease
3. The MEB recommended his referral to a PEB. On 4 May 2011, he concurred with the MEB findings and recommendation.
4. Item 30 (Continuation) of his DA Form 3947 states, "The DA Form 3947 includes all my current medical conditions and whether or not they meet medical retention standards" and "I agree that this MEB accurately covers all my current medical conditions."
5. On 3 June 2011, a PEB found him physically unfit due to cervical degenerative disease (condition manifested in 2009 at Fort Campbell due to chronic physical demands of military activities) and limitation of right ankle motion (condition manifested at Fort Campbell in 2009 after foot was stomped on during training exercise). The PEB recommended a 20-percent disability rating and separation with severance pay. On 10 June 2011, he concurred with the recommendation of the PEB and waived a formal hearing of his case.
6. He provided a thoracic spine x-ray, dated 28 July 2011, in conjunction with his VA physical, which shows minimal T8, T9, and T10 compression fractures.
7. He provided a VA Compensation and Pension physical examination performed by a contracted physician on 19 August 2011. He was diagnosed with:
* bilateral flat feet with medial talar tilt, bilateral halllux valgus deformity, and hyperpronation
* prostate hyperplasia
* nasal septal deviation with bilateral subtotal obstruction
* allergic rhinitis with posterior pharyngeal lymphoid hyperplasia
* pseudofolliculitis barbae
* hypertension
* anterior fibular talar ligament partial disruption/posterior fibular talar impingement syndrome secondary to hyperpronation
* less than 20-percent height loss T8, T9, and T10 compression fractures with increased kyphosis (curvature of the spine) and dextroscoliosis (curvature of the spine to the right)
* cervical levoscoliosis (curvature of the spine to the left)
* chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* chronic esophageal reflux secondary to hiatal hernia
* supraventricular tachycardia
8. On 27 September 2011, he was honorably discharged by reason of disability with severance pay (non-combat related).
9. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. It states there is no legal requirement in arriving at the rated degree of incapacity to rate a physical condition which is not in itself considered disqualifying for military service when a Soldier is found unfit because of another condition that is disqualifying. Only the unfitting conditions or defects and those which contribute to unfitness will be considered in arriving at the rated degree of incapacity warranting retirement or separation for disability.
10. Chapter 3 (Medical fitness standards for retention and separation, including retirement) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) does not list compression fractures in the vertebrae/thoracic area as an unfitting medical condition or physical defect which may render a Soldier unfit for further medical service.
11. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides for disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his or her office, rank, grade, or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.
12. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service or a disability rating of at least 30 percent. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rating of less than 30 percent.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant requests the addition of three compression fractures in the vertebrae/thoracic area as an unfitting condition and an increase in his disability rating.
2. Although "minimal T8, T9, and T10 compression fractures" were noted on his radiology report during the VA Compensation and Pension physical examination prior to his discharge date, it is a medically acceptable condition and is not considered "unfit."
3. His MEB did not list three compression fractures in the vertebrae/thoracic area as a medical condition/defect and he agreed that the MEB accurately listed all of his current medical conditions. There is no evidence to show he was given a physical profile for compression fractures. He provided no evidence to show this condition rendered him unfit to perform his military duties. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence with which to add this medical condition as an unfitting condition.
4. The evidence shows the PEB found him physically unfit due to cervical degenerative disease and limitation of right ankle motion. He concurred with the PEB findings and recommendation on 10 June 2011.
5. There is insufficient evidence to show his unfitting conditions were improperly rated by the PEB in 2011. Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to increase his disability rating.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ___x_____ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____________x____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140011765
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140011765
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | pd-2012-00915
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20020709 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200915 BOARD DATE: 20121206 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E‐4 (92R/Parachute Rigger), medically separated for chronic mid and lower back pain with degenerative disc disease thoracic and lumbar spines. Any conditions or contention not requested...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00723
The CI was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. Post-Separation) All Effective Date 20020412 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Thoracic Back Pain w/ Scheuermann's Kyphosis 5285-5299 5295 10% Scheuermanns Disease of The Thoracic Spine 5285-5291 10%* 20020304 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. Chronic Thoracic Back Pain with Scheuermann's Kyphosis Condition.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010120
In his case, the best evidence is Doctor D___s 6 November 2007 physical examination report, which notes the required symptoms for 10 percent ratings for his neck and back. The applicant states that Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 3-2(a)(5), states, In the absence of such proof by the preponderance of the evidence, reasonable doubt should be resolved in favor of the Soldier. In his case, even assuming that all four medical reports were valid and based on actual examinations, the PEB...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058583C070421
APPLICANT STATES : That she had a compression fracture from an injury that she received in Kuwait. An 8 June 2001 VA medical record shows that she was receiving a 60 percent disability rating for neck and back pain, that the applicant stated that her problem had been progressively getting worse. Physical evaluation boards are established to evaluate all cases of physical disability equitability for the soldier and the Army.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00820
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20031115 NAME: XX CASE NUMBER: PD1200820 BOARD DATE: 20130206 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCpl/E-3 (6113/CH-53E Helicopter Mechanic) medically separated for T-10, T-11, T-12 compression fractures with a spinal angulation of 40 degrees. The MEB forwarded “Right Clavicular Fracture,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00627
Pre-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Mid Thoracic Pain w/Compression Fracture with Schmorls Nodes 5299-5295 10% T6 Compression Fracture w/Insomnia 5285-5291 20% 20020709 Right Hip Pain (trochanteric bursitis) Not Unfitting Right Hip Greater Trochantitis 5252 0%* 20020709 Somatic Dysfunction of Cervico-thoracic and rib areas Not Unfitting No VA Entry No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x 3 20020709 Rating: 10% Rating: 20% Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01679
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20040129VA* -based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, Status Post Compression Fractures… 523510%Fracture of the Thoracic Spine5299-523510%STROther x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 4...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00547
ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Thoracic Back Pain523710%Thoracic, Lumbar and Left Sacroiliac Joint Strain523710%20081106↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓Cervical Strain523710%20081106Major Depression943440%20081027Tinnitus626010%20081027Residuals of Traumatic Brain Injury/Chronic Headaches804510%200810300% x 1/Not Service-Connected x 320081106 Combined: 10%Combined: 60% ANALYSIS SUMMARY : In opening, the Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00018
Right Knee Pain Condition . The MEB physical exam documented two ROMs. In the matter of the right knee condition and the back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01299
(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The service ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB rated the residuals of T12 compression fracture with increased thoracic kyphosis 10%...