Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007411
Original file (20140007411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140007411 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment of combat-related special compensation (CRSC).

2.  The applicant states:

* he has been denied CRSC three times
* his injuries are all combat-related
* he recently had his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) corrected to show his actual dates of combat time
* he is submitting medical documentation showing he has depression which is directly related to his post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
* his leave and earnings statements (LES's) show he received imminent danger pay
* his records clearly show he served in combat and his disabilities are service connected

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)
* letters from doctors, his ex-wife, and first sergeant
* LES's
* CRSC denial letters
* 61 pages recounting his personal combat experiences

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 August 1979.  He served as a chemical operations specialist in Southwest Asia from 12 December 1990 to 5 May 1991.  On 31 August 1999, he retired in the rank of staff sergeant.

3.  There are no medical documents in the available records.

4.  He provided a letter from a psychologist at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 20 May 2009, which states he is receiving mental health services for PTSD.  He contends the applicant is disabled by the symptoms of PTSD and the PTSD is clearly service connected.

5.  He provided a letter from his first sergeant during the time in question, dated 2 July 2009, which states the applicant served in the Gulf War, he had changed after his deployment, and he displayed early signs and symptoms of PTSD.

6.  He provided a letter from his ex-wife, a psychologist, dated 25 July 2009, which states that prior to the applicant's deployment he was a loving and caring husband and father.  After returning from Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm it was immediately obvious that something had changed in him.  He had nightmares, was cranky, and unhappy.  He had obvious signs of depression.  The applicant filed for divorce; this was not something she wanted.

7.  On 3 August 2010, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command CRSC Branch reviewed his claim for CRSC and was unable to verify the following conditions as combat-related disabilities:

* bronchial asthma – 10 percent
* multiple joint pain involving right hip, shoulders, knees, and lumbosacral spine – 10 percent
* dyspepsia – 10 percent
* hypothyroidism – 10 percent
* myofascial pain – 10 percent
* major depressive disorder – 50 percent
* plantar fasciitis, left foot –0 percent
* residuals scar, right leg –10 percent
* scars, right heel – 10 percent
* tinnitus – 10 percent

8.  On 10 December 2010, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command CRSC Branch reviewed his claim for CRSC and verified his medical condition (fibromyalgia – 10 percent) as combat-related, but was unable to verify the following conditions as combat-related disabilities:

* asthma –10 percent
* dyspepsia –10 percent
* hypothyroidism –10 percent
* myofascial pain –10 percent
* major depressive disorder – 50 percent
* allergic rhinitis – 0 percent
* residual scar, right leg –10 percent
* plantar fasciitis, left foot – 0 percent
* scars, right heel –10 percent
* residual scar, right forearm – 0 percent
* tinnitus – 10 percent

9.  On 14 February 2011, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command CRSC Branch reviewed his claim for CRSC and was unable to find justification to reverse the previous decisions.  The CRSC Branch verified his medical condition (fibromyalgia – 10 percent) as combat-related, but was unable to verify the following conditions as combat-related disabilities:

* asthma –10 percent
* gastritis –10 percent
* hypothyroidism –10 percent
* limited motion of the jaw – 10 percent
* major depressive disorder – 50 percent
* residuals of right foot injury –10 percent
* residuals of left foot injury – 0 percent
* scars – 10 percent
* tinnitus – 10 percent

10.  He provided a letter from a psychologist, dated 9 April 2014, which states the applicant is being treated for depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms.  He recommended approval of the applicant's request for CRSC.

11.  CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, states eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation – or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at age 60 – and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10-percent disabling.  CRSC benefits are equal to the amount of VA disability compensation offset from retired pay based on those disabilities determined to be combat-related.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant disagrees with the CSRC determination that his disabilities were not combat-related.

2.  CRSC is specifically for those military retirees who have combat-related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant CRSC to a military retiree.  The military retiree must show the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specialty hazardous duties.

3.  The applicant submitted evidence showing his disabilities were service related.  However, he has not submitted any evidence showing these conditions are combat-related.  The fact that he was in a combat theater of operations is insufficient, in and of itself, to warrant approval of CRSC.

4.  CRSC determinations require evidence of a direct, causal relationship to the military retiree's VA-rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.

5.  Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant's VA-rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007411



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140007411



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019571

    Original file (20130019571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The artillery rounds were over 100 pounds each and had to be carried on the shoulder during firing missions. During firing, he was exposed to loud noises and he inhaled smoke that hurt the lungs and caused severe coughing because of the fumes. Without conclusive evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship of the applicant's conditions of bronchial asthma, right and left elbow strain, right and left carpel tunnel syndrome, thoracolumbar spine strain with spondylosis, and right and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003477

    Original file (20140003477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120022745 on 25 July 2013. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship of the applicant's VA-rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is an insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140009802

    Original file (AR20140009802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CRSC criteria are specifically for those military retirees who have combat related disabilities. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. The applicant has submitted evidence to show that his PTSD is service related.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020219

    Original file (20130020219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides copies of: a. his CRSC request and a 27 September 2013 denial letter from HRC, b. a report showing he was involved in a training accident on 5 March 1991. The applicant's requests for CRSC were denied because the available evidence failed to show his medical conditions were combat related.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003651C070206

    Original file (20050003651C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Linda M. Baker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the partial denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application and excerpts from his military and VA medical records. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004524

    Original file (20110004524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The letter also advised the applicant that the following conditions were unable to be verified as a combat-related disability: (1) Bilateral Pes Planus with Achilles Tendonitis, (2) Hypertension, (3) Left Shoulder Condition with Scars (no new evidence provided to show combat-related event caused condition, documentation stated injury occurred while lifting heavy water containers), (4) Status Post...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018589

    Original file (20120018589.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision * Progress Notes * three letters from the CRSC Branch * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 November 2011, the HRC CRSC Branch informed the applicant that they were unable to overturn the previous adjudications because the documents he submitted still showed no new evidence to link his requested conditions to a combat-related event and he was advised to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022745

    Original file (20120022745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120022745 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). CRSC benefits are equal to the amount of VA disability compensation offset from retired pay based on those disabilities determined to be combat-related.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018103

    Original file (20110018103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    CRSC, as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, U.S. Code, as amended, states that eligible members are retired veterans with combat-related injuries who meet all of the following criteria: * Active, Reserve or National Guard with 20 years of creditable service, or permanent medical retiree, or Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) retiree * receiving military retired pay * have 10% or greater VA rated injury * military retired pay is reduced by VA disability payments (VA Waiver) * an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023800

    Original file (20110023800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was noted the applicant had previously requested CRSC for each of these conditions, but no new evidence was provided to show a combat-related event caused any of the conditions. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or...