IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 25 July 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120022745
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests to be granted combat-related special compensation (CRSC).
2. The applicant states, in effect:
* he should be granted CRSC for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after being in combat in the Gulf War
* this condition was established as directly related to his military service
* the CRSC office has all documents to show he was in and a part of the Gulf War combat zone
* he was disapproved for CRSC benefits for PTSD, sleep loss, tinnitus, and hearing problems
3. The applicant provides:
* CRSC denial letter, dated 2 October 2012
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) documentation and medical records
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 July 1977. He served as a signal support systems specialist in Southwest Asia from 18 August 1990 to
21 March 1991. On 30 September 1997, he retired in the rank of sergeant first class.
3. There are no medical documents in the available records.
4. On 13 December 2004, the VA granted him service-connected disability compensation for:
* PTSD (disability rating increased from 30% to 50%)
* patellofemoral syndrome, left knee with degenerative joint disease (DJD) (disability rating increased from 0% to 10%)
* tinnitus (10%)
* right knee tendonitis and degenerative joint disease (10%)
* left ear hearing loss (0%)
5. On 21 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency CRSC Division disapproved his request for reconsideration for CRSC. He was advised his next recourse was to apply to this Board.
6. On 14 July 2011, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command CRSC Branch reviewed his claim for CRSC and was unable to verify the following conditions as combat-related disabilities:
* right knee tendonitis and DJD
* patellofemoral syndrome, left knee with DJD
* lumbosacral strain
* PTSD
* frostbite residuals, left lower extremity
* frostbite residuals, right lower extremity
* tinnitus
7. A letter, dated 2 October 2012, from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command CRSC Branch states:
* after reviewing all documentation in support of his claim, that office is unable to overturn the previous adjudications(s)
* the documentation submitted still shows no new evidence to link his requested conditions to a combat-related event
* this disapproval is final
8. He provides VA documentation which states the following conditions were service-connected, Gulf War incurred:
* PTSD
* lumbosacral strain
* right knee tendonitis and DJD
* tinnitus
9. CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, states that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at age 60 and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10-percent disabling. CRSC benefits are equal to the amount of VA disability compensation offset from retired pay based on those disabilities determined to be combat-related.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant disagrees with the CSRC determination that his disabilities were not combat-related.
2. CRSC is specifically for those military retirees who have combat-related disabilities. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant CRSC to a military retiree. The military retiree must show the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specialty hazardous duties.
3. The applicant has submitted evidence to show that his PTSD, lumbosacral strain, right knee tendonitis and DJD, and tinnitus were service related. However, he has not submitted any evidence which would show that these conditions are combat-related. The fact that he was in a theater of operations is insufficient, in and of itself, to warrant approval of CRSC.
4. CRSC determinations require evidence of a direct, causal relationship to the military retirees VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.
5. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicants VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x___ ____x___ ____x ___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________ _ x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120022745
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120022745
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003477
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120022745 on 25 July 2013. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship of the applicant's VA-rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is an insufficient...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018798
The 2 August 2011 HRC CRSC decision also indicates the certifying officer was unable to verify the following conditions as combat-related disabilities: VASRD* DESCRIPTION % JUSTIFICATION/COMMENTS 5252 Degenerative Joint Disease, Right Hip 10% Final disapproval Previously requested : No new evidence to show combat-related event caused condition 5242 Lumbosacral Strain with Radic-ulopathy of Lower Extremities 10% Final disapproval Previously requested : No new evidence to show...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018589
The applicant provides: * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision * Progress Notes * three letters from the CRSC Branch * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 November 2011, the HRC CRSC Branch informed the applicant that they were unable to overturn the previous adjudications because the documents he submitted still showed no new evidence to link his requested conditions to a combat-related event and he was advised to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019571
The artillery rounds were over 100 pounds each and had to be carried on the shoulder during firing missions. During firing, he was exposed to loud noises and he inhaled smoke that hurt the lungs and caused severe coughing because of the fumes. Without conclusive evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship of the applicant's conditions of bronchial asthma, right and left elbow strain, right and left carpel tunnel syndrome, thoracolumbar spine strain with spondylosis, and right and...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03881
In support of her request, she provided documentation associated with her CRSC application. She requested reconsideration after the VA granted her PTSD and Depression as a service connected disability. No additional documentation was provided to support a combat-related event as the direct cause for PTSD and Depression.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003118
It defines a combat-related disability as a disability that is compensable under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and that is attributable to an injury for which the member was awarded the Purple Heart; or was incurred (as determined under the criteria prescribed by the Secretary of Defense): (1) as a direct result of armed conflict; (2) while engaged in hazardous service; (3) in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war; or (4) through an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016725
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He indicates he can swear under oath that the patches are a direct result of combat or combat related training. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Degenerative Arthritis of the Spine, Left Spine, Eczema, and Tendon Inflammation Left Shoulder, unfortunately there is no evidence in the available record that shows these conditions were sustained as a direct result of armed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014768
On 19 March 2012, a TDRL PEB convened and found his condition continued since being placed on the TDRL. The military retiree must show the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving. CRSC determinations require evidence of a direct, causal relationship to the military retirees VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012595
c. The CRSC Office was unable to verify the below conditions as combat-related disabilities: * Hemorrhoids; this condition does not meet the criteria for CRSC * Knee condition, left knee; there is no evidence to connect disability to parachute or airborne operations * Lumbosacral or cervical strain of left spine; the documentation does not show accident or incident to connect disability to a combat-related event; the VA rating states his back pain is due to kidney infection * Scars of scalp;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002041C070206
The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for his right knee and lower back be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. Since there is no...