Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020219
Original file (20130020219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE: 31 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130020219 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of combat-related special compensation (CRSC) for injuries/conditions not previously considered qualifying.

2.  The applicant states there is no error in his records; he was instructed to apply to this Board to further appeal the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) denial. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* HRC CRSC denial letter, dated 27 September 2013
* an envelope, postmarked 23 October 2013, addressed to him from HRC 
* U.S. Army Mishap Report Information, dated 15 December 2005
* Emergency Care and Treatment Record, dated 5 March 1991
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Progress Note dated 1 January 2005
* Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 5 February 2003
* letter from a German doctor, dated 22 February 2001 (primarily written in German)
* email notes, subject:  CRSC
* May 2008 edition of the Gulf War Review published by the VA
* his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant retired due to length of service as a sergeant first class/E-7 on 30 June 2003.
2.  The applicant was previously awarded CRSC for various conditions rated 
10 percent each.

3.  He applied for CRSC for right shoulder degenerative joint disease; excision, benign mass, neck scar; hypertension; hypertensive heart disease associated with hypertension; post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and obstructive sleep apnea.  The reason listed for the denial is, "no evidence provided to show combat-related event caused condition."  

4.  The applicant provides copies of:

	a.  his CRSC request and a 27 September 2013 denial letter from HRC,

	b.  a report showing he was involved in a training accident on 5 March 1991.  He was injured in a motor vehicle accident.  The report shows the accident was Desert Storm non-tactical training.

	c.  medical documents showing he was treated on 5 March 1991 for multiple soft tissue injuries to his hand, shoulder, hip, elbow and thigh.

	c.  a 6 January 2005 VA Progress Note showing he received a positive screen for PTSD.

	d.  medical documents showing he was seen at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center on 5 February 2003 for sensitivity to light, and by a German doctor on
22 February 2003, who diagnosed him with depressed mood, hyperalgesica, fibromyalgia, medial shin bone syndrome, and pes planovalgus. 

	e.  email notes relating to the handling of his CRSC request.

5.  The Under Secretary of Defense for Military Personnel Policy provided policy guidance for processing CRSC appeals.  The guidance states there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war for a condition to be considered combat related.

6.  CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat-related disabilities if it weren't for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.

	a.  Payment is made by the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free.

	b.  Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, especially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.

	c.  Qualified disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10-percent disabling.

	d.  Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay because CRSC requires the Military Department to return a portion of the waived retired pay to the military retiree.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's requests for CRSC were denied because the available evidence failed to show his medical conditions were combat related.  He has not provided any additional documentary evidence to indicate otherwise.

2.  The CRSC is specifically for those military retirees who have combat-related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show the disability was incurred while engaged in combat or while performing duties simulating war.

3.  Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship of the applicant's VA-rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is an insufficient basis on which to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000988



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130020219



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017427

    Original file (20140017427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested the ABCMR reconsider his previous request and provided a document entitled Combat Action Badge Information. When a Solder has been awarded a Combat Action Badge, it may help make a determination for CRSC but only if that person is later diagnosed with PTSD as a direct result of the incident for which the award was given. Second, other veterans, those who were awarded CRSC, first had conditions that were rated by VA with a 10% or greater disability rating, and then...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021776

    Original file (20110021776.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 March 1991, the VA awarded him a 10% service-connected disability for his broken leg. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021776 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021776 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015399

    Original file (20130015399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for injuries he received on active duty during training simulating war and using an instrument of war. On 12 August 2005, the Special Actions Branch, CRSC Division, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), considered the applicant's claim for CSRC. The medical record he provided, dated 15 January 2013, offers insufficient evidence to support a claim to CRSC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019671

    Original file (20130019671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command’s (HRC) decision to deny him combat-related special compensation (CRSC) for Degenerative Joint Disease Lumbar Spine. The applicant provides a letter, dated 9 September 2013, from HRC CRSC Branch, wherein he was notified the documentation he submitted still showed no new evidence to link his requested conditions (to include Degenerative Joint Disease Lumbar Spine) to a combat-related event. The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004618

    Original file (20130004618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 16 January 2013, the HRC CRSC Branch informed the applicant that, after reviewing all documentation in support of his claim, they were unable to overturn the previous adjudications because the documentation submitted still shows no new evidence to link his requested conditions to a combat-related event. CRSC, as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, U.S. Code, as amended, states that eligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011899

    Original file (20130011899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the CRSC Office awarded him CRSC for multiple conditions between 2005 and 2009 but later declared him ineligible and discontinued payment * the Notice of CRSC final reconsideration is in error because it did not follow or review or acknowledge the standards of this program * because he is considered unemployable by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), he should be entitled to 100 percent CRSC compensation * he is also determined unemployable by the Social Security...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009832

    Original file (20140009832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record is void of any evidence that shows his injuries were a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Hypertensive Heart Disease, Degenerative Arthritis of the Cervical Spine, Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Syndrome with Thoracolumbar Degenerative Changes with Erectile Dysfunction, Healed Fracture; Left...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014768

    Original file (20120014768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 March 2012, a TDRL PEB convened and found his condition continued since being placed on the TDRL. The military retiree must show the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving. CRSC determinations require evidence of a direct, causal relationship to the military retiree’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004932

    Original file (20110004932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete service and/or VA medical records are not available for review with this case. The troop medic completed an SF 600 for both injuries but documentation did not remain in his permanent record despite follow on medical care for those injuries; d. MFR, dated 4 August 2009, stating he sustained chronic lumbar (low back), thoracic (mid back), cervical (neck), right and left knee, right and left should pain; high frequency hearing loss, and squarmous cell carcinoma of the tongue that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004524

    Original file (20110004524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The letter also advised the applicant that the following conditions were unable to be verified as a combat-related disability: (1) Bilateral Pes Planus with Achilles Tendonitis, (2) Hypertension, (3) Left Shoulder Condition with Scars (no new evidence provided to show combat-related event caused condition, documentation stated injury occurred while lifting heavy water containers), (4) Status Post...