Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003651C070206
Original file (20050003651C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           26 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20050003651


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James E. Vick                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Conrad V. Meyer               |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Linda M. Baker                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation
(CRSC).

2.  The applicant states that he didn’t have sinus problems or asthma prior
to his service in the Persian Gulf.  He participated in the Department of
Defense Gulf War Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Program and was
diagnosed with sinus problems and asthma, which were said to be “as a
result of my involvement in the Gulf War.”

3.  He states that his shoulder disability was caused by his loading cases
of ammunition and explosives on a helicopter after completing a combat
mission during Operation Enduring Freedom.

4.  He states that his tinnitus was caused by his exposure to the noise of
the airfield while in Afghanistan during Operation Enduring Freedom.

5.  The applicant provides the partial denial of his request to reconsider
his CRSC application and excerpts from his military and VA medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section
1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, states that eligible
members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay
computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at
age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed
conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that
simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities
must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling.  For
periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members
had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart
and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled
as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training
exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  CRSC
benefits are equal to the amount of VA disability compensation offset from
retired pay based on those disabilities determined to be combat-related.




2.  On 17 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA)
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch determined that the
applicant’s Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was combat related and
awarded him 50 percent CRSC.  However, the USAPDA CRSC Branch denied his
request for CRSC for nasal swelling, asthma, degenerative arthritis, and
tinnitus.

3.  In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained
from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military
Personnel Policy.  The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order
for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of
the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation
of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have
combat related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of
operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to
grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the
disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties
simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous
duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

2.  The applicant has stated that he incurred his nasal condition and
asthma as a result of him being in the Persian Gulf.  This is not in and of
itself sufficient to approve these two conditions for CRSC.  He has stated
that he injured his shoulder while loading ammunition after completing a
combat mission.  That scenario would appear to show that the applicant was
performing his normal duties and was not actually in combat at the time of
injury.  Therefore, the shoulder injury would not be considered combat
related.  As for the applicant’s tinnitus, absent any evidence of noise
trauma, what caused the condition is speculation.  Since this does not
establish a direct, causal relationship to war, there is no basis for
approving this condition for CRSC.

3.  It is noted that the applicant has already been approved for 50 percent
CRSC.  This denial simply means he will not receive any additional CRSC
benefits.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___jev __  ___cvm _  ____lmb_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





            ________James E. Vick________
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050003651                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051026                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |








-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019571

    Original file (20130019571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The artillery rounds were over 100 pounds each and had to be carried on the shoulder during firing missions. During firing, he was exposed to loud noises and he inhaled smoke that hurt the lungs and caused severe coughing because of the fumes. Without conclusive evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship of the applicant's conditions of bronchial asthma, right and left elbow strain, right and left carpel tunnel syndrome, thoracolumbar spine strain with spondylosis, and right and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006389C070206

    Original file (20050006389C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his nine Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for degenerative arthritis be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Even if the applicant had submitted documentation showing that he was injured in the Gulf War, he would still have to show that the injury was combat related and that it caused his nine VA rated disabilities for degenerative arthritis. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001445C070205

    Original file (20060001445C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Gerald J. Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, military medical records showing that he was given physical profile limitations because of hearing loss, and VA rating decisions. Tinnitus is the medical term for "hearing" noises in your ears when there is no outside source of the sounds.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018153

    Original file (20130018153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to be granted Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for his condition of tinnitus. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a (CRSC), provides that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. The applicant failed to show through the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007804C070206

    Original file (20050007804C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Allen L. Raub | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In effect, the applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for hearing loss and tinnitus be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The OUSD advisory opinions indicate that CRSC is generally intended for military retirees who can show that their disabilities were caused by a specific incident which has been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013338

    Original file (20070013338.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009512C070206

    Original file (20050009512C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002731C070206

    Original file (20050002731C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Leonard G. Hassell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As stated above, the CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat related disabilities. Without evidence of a specific event which caused the applicant’s tinnitus, there is no basis for approving this condition for CRSC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002742C070206

    Original file (20050002742C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Laverne V. Berry | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006358C070206

    Original file (20050006358C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Thus, one Gulf War veteran presenting with difficult-to-diagnose symptoms could be diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome, which cannot be service-connected under this law because it is a diagnosis. While the applicant has five disabilities which have been classified as Gulf War incurred, there is no evidence or indication that those...