Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001829
Original file (20140001829.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	  9 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001829 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states he was never awarded the AGCM for his honorable service.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was serving in the U.S. Army Reserve when he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 December 1983 for a period of 3 years and training as a Man Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) crewman.  
3.  He completed one-station unit training at Fort Bliss, Texas and was transferred to Germany for his first assignment.  He completed his assignment in Germany and was transferred to Fort Bliss on 22 October 1985.

4.  On 15 December 1986, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the pay grade of E-4 due to the expiration of his term of service and the Christmas Early Release Program.  He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 19 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, and Army Achievement Medal. 

5.  A review of his official records failed to show any derogatory information or disqualification by the commander that would disqualify him for award of the AGCM.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of active Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  A review of the applicant's records show no derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for the first award of the AGCM.  Therefore, it appears that the failure to award him the first award of the AGCM was the result of an administrative error.  

2.  Accordingly, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 
27 December 1983 to 15 December 1986 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

___X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 27 December 1983 to 
15 December 1986 and adding it to his DD Form 214.




      _______ _  X ___   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001829





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001829



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024480

    Original file (20100024480.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the AGCM while stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina; however, it was not included on his DD Form 214. If the commander’s decision remains the same, the commander will forward his or her statement, the individual’s statement, and his or her consideration for permanent filing in the individual’s Official Military Personnel File. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090165C070212

    Original file (2003090165C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 31 July 1980 to 15 July 1983. a. by showing that the individual concerned was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 (SP4) on 1 February 1982, that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021010

    Original file (20090021010.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the GCMDL, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the GCMDL at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024870

    Original file (20110024870.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal (2d award), Joint Meritorious Unit Award, National Defense Service Medal, Afghanistan Campaign Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon (2d award), NATO Medal, and the Combat Action Badge. After carefully examining the applicant's record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018779

    Original file (20130018779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 1 year, 7 months and 5 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Army Commendation Medal. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 15 December 1967 through 19 July 1969. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012483

    Original file (20120012483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed 3 years of active service. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the first award of the AGCM for the period 13 August 1986 through 12 August 1989 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 13 August 1986 through 12 August 1989 and adding it to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000957

    Original file (20150000957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant's service in support of: a. c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 28 July 1986 through 27 July 1989. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 28 July 1986 through 27 July 1989 (Standard Name Line: SPC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007949

    Original file (20130007949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his service in Korea and his award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003943

    Original file (20110003943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was only awarded one award of the Purple Heart and he should have been awarded two awards. He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 11 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006955

    Original file (20130006955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although there are no orders in the available records showing the applicant was awarded the CIB, it is reasonable to believe that he was awarded the CIB because he was an infantryman serving in an infantry unit at the time he was wounded and awarded the Purple Heart and BSM with “V” Device. The applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam that entitles him to four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all...