Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021010
Original file (20090021010.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021010 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL).

2.  The applicant states that he served on active duty from 1986 to 1989 with no disciplinary action being taken against him; however, he was never awarded the GCMDL and he has attempted to have it corrected in the past.  He goes on to state that he has served 23 years in the Coast Guard and he desires his records to be correct when he retires.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 January 1986 for a period of 3 years, assignment to Europe and training as a medical specialist.  He completed his basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and his advanced individual training at Fort Sam Houston, Texas before being transferred to Germany on 11 June 1986.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 February 1988.

3.  He completed his tour in Germany on 1 June 1988 and was transferred to Fort Bliss, Texas, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12 July 1989, due to his expiration of term of service (ETS).  He had served 3 years and 6 months of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon, his marksmanship badges, and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

4.  A review of the applicant’s official records fails to reveal any derogatory information or information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the GCMDL.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 13 January 1986 through 12 January 1989.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the GCMDL, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.  

2.  It is reasonable to presume that the applicant not receiving the GCMDL was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the GCMDL at this time.



BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 13 January 1986 through 12 January 1989, while serving in the rank of specialist four.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021010





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021010



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012483

    Original file (20120012483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed 3 years of active service. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the first award of the AGCM for the period 13 August 1986 through 12 August 1989 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 13 August 1986 through 12 August 1989 and adding it to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013427

    Original file (20080013427.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 8 September 1975 through 7 September 1978. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the KDSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011206

    Original file (20060011206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011206 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (First Oak Leaf...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000970C070206

    Original file (20050000970C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 4 November 1965 through 25 October 1967. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the GCMDL at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000970C070206

    Original file (20050000970C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 4 November 1965 through 25 October 1967. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the GCMDL at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001829

    Original file (20140001829.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The applicant states he was never awarded the AGCM for his honorable service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 27 December 1983 to 15 December 1986 and adding it to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001563C070206

    Original file (20050001563C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 OCTOBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001563 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He departed Vietnam on 19 August 1969 and was transferred to Fort Campbell, where he remained until 17 November 1969, when he was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas. His records also show that he received “Excellent”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001563C070206

    Original file (20050001563C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded on 13 March 1969 and was awarded the Purple Heart for that wound. He departed Vietnam on 19 August 1969 and was transferred to Fort Campbell, where he remained until 17 November 1969, when he was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas. His records also show that he received “Excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no derogatory information contained in those records that would serve to disqualify him for award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079456C070215

    Original file (2002079456C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Reentry (RE) Code be changed to a more favorable code and that his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) be added to his report of separation (DD Form 214).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004510

    Original file (20120004510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he completed airborne training and was awarded the Parachutist Badge and neither are reflected on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected by awarding the...