Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024480
Original file (20100024480.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	

		BOARD DATE:	  13 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024480 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by showing the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the AGCM while stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina; however, it was not included on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 July 1983 for a period of 3 years and training as an infantryman.  He completed his one-station unit training at Fort Benning, Georgia and was transferred to Germany.

3.  On 2 May 1985, he completed his tour in Germany and was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia where he completed airborne training and was then transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 19 December 1985.  He was honorably discharged on 31 January 1986.

4.  On 1 February 1986, he reenlisted for a period of 6 years, assignment to Europe and a selective reenlistment bonus.

5.  On 6 August 1987, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 due to physical disability with severance pay (20%).  He had served 4 years and 23 days of total active service and he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Army of Occupation Medal, German Armed Forces Marksman Badge (Bronze), and the Expert Infantryman Badge.

6.  A review of his official records fails to show the applicant was awarded the AGCM or that he was disqualified for award of the AGCM by his commander.  Additionally, his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM.

7.  His records do show that in August 1985 he was involved in a motorcycle accident in Fayetteville, North Carolina and his injuries required multiple surgeries.  He was also medically disqualified from airborne duty.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that in instances of disqualification as determined by the unit commander, the commander will prepare a statement of the rationale for his or her decision.  This statement will include the period of disqualification and will be referred to the individual concerned for response.  The 


unit commander will consider the individual’s statement.  If the commander’s decision remains the same, the commander will forward his or her statement, the individual’s statement, and his or her consideration for permanent filing in the individual’s Official Military Personnel File.  The immediate commander’s decision to award the Army Good Conduct Medal will be based on his or her personal knowledge and of the individual’s official records for the periods of service under previous commanders during the period for which the award is to be made.  However, there is no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander has approved the award and the award has been announced in permanent orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant’s records do not contain and the applicant has not provided orders awarding him the AGCM, it is reasonable to presume that he was in fact awarded the AGCM.

2.  This presumption is based on the fact that the applicant served his first enlistment of 3 years, was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, reenlisted for 6 years and his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM.

3.  Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to add the award of the AGCM to his records at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

___x__  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all 


Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the award of the AGCM to his DD Form 214.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024480



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024480



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004510

    Original file (20120004510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he completed airborne training and was awarded the Parachutist Badge and neither are reflected on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected by awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091247C070212

    Original file (2003091247C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the evidence does not clearly establish the date the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, documents contained in his records that are dated as early as 16 August 1969 and all the way through the date of his REFRAD, indicate his rank as that of a sergeant. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 28 November 1967 through 13 August 1970. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001693

    Original file (20140001693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, it should be awarded at this time and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 30 December 1966 through 15 December 1969 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Awarding him the CIB effective 6 November 1967 while serving in the rank of PFC * Awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087463C070212

    Original file (2003087463C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That there are orders in his OMPF awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (Fifth Award), dated 8 April 1999. In a 6 April 1998 memorandum from the commander of HHC, 27th Engineer Battalion at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, the applicant was informed of the commander's intention to disqualify him for award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period October 1994 to October 1997. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed qualifying service of three years for award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017836

    Original file (20100017836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, at the time of his release from active duty (REFRAD) he did not receive all of the decorations he was authorized. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Add...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004503

    Original file (20130004503.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) for the period 12 November 2001 – 11 November 2004. If the commander’s decision remains the same, the commander will forward his or her statement, the individual’s statement, and his or her consideration for permanent filing in the individual’s AMHRR. Inasmuch as the applicant was not afforded his rights under the prevailing regulation, it would serve the interest of justice to award him the AGCM (5th Award) for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001893

    Original file (20090001893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in his service personnel records that show he was awarded the BSM, ARCOM (2nd Award), AAM (2nd Award), AGCM, or the Honduran Military Airborne Badge. Neither the applicant's DD Form 214 nor his DA Form 2-1 show the second award of the ARCOM or the AAM and the applicant's records do not contain any orders for these awards. In the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient basis to correct his DD Form 214 to show his service in Honduras or to award him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001237

    Original file (20080001237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and any other awards to which he is entitled and were not listed on his DD Form 214. However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 21 June 1965 through 12 June 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007488C080407

    Original file (20070007488C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) and Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his 9 December 1968 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. Item 23a of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows he held the MOS 11C and Item 24 shows he earned the following awards: NDSM; VSM; RVNCM; CIB; Parachutist Badge; and ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007830

    Original file (20150007830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that a memorandum disqualifying him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF)). The applicant states his records contain a disqualification memorandum for award of the AGCM which does not show the period of disqualification. His performance folder of his OMPF also contains PO 031-0016, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison Command, Fort Knox, KY, dated 31 January 2011 awarding him the AGCM (2nd...