Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001094
Original file (20140001094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  11 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001094 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 17 December 1993 to show her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized.

2.  The applicant states:

* she met the requirements for an honorable discharge
* she completed her contract/term of service
* she wants her DD Form 214 corrected for employment purposes to obtain/qualify for veterans' preference as a civilian Federal employee

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 for the period ending 17 December 1993
* U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 27 May 1993 for a period of 8 years.  She was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) on 27 August 1993.  On 17 December 1993, she was released from IADT to the control of her USAR unit by reason of completion of required active service.

3.  Item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 17 December 1993 shows the entry "UNCHARACTERIZED."

4.  She provided orders, dated 29 May 2001, that show she was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 29 May 2001.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, provided for the discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment and other periods of active duty or IADT.  The service of Army National Guard and USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT to which ordered and who are in an entry-level status will be uncharacterized, even though they have completed their IADT successfully.  A separation would be described as an entry-level separation if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status.  Entry-level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active service.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  A DD Form 214 will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from the Active Army.  Personnel included are members of the Army National Guard and USAR separated after completing IADT which resulted in the award of a military occupational specialty, even though the active duty was less than 90 days.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the applicant was ordered to IADT in 1993 for a period of 3 months and 21 days (111 days).  Since she was in an entry-level status when she was released from active duty in 1993, her service was uncharacterized which is properly reflected in item 24 of her DD Form 214 for this period.
2.  An uncharacterized period of service is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier's military service.  It merely means the Soldier has not served on active duty long enough for his or her character of service to be rated.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  _X_______  _X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001094



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001094



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007526

    Original file (20130007526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." The letter states VA records certified she "separated under honorable conditions from active duty military service." Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) states the service of ARNG Soldiers in an entry-level status upon completion of IADT will be uncharacterized even though they...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011625

    Original file (20130011625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 shows her: * type for separation - release from active duty training * characterization of service - uncharacterized * narrative reason for separation - completion of required active service. c. Paragraph 3–9 (Uncharacterized Separations) states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if separation processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry-level status, except when: (1) characterization under other than honorable conditions is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018555

    Original file (20130018555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an honorable character of service. In May 1991, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and entered Active Duty for Training (ADT) on 18 July 1991. Discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment and other periods of active duty or ADT state the service of Soldiers specified in this paragraph who are in entry-level status will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010567

    Original file (20130010567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that her service was honorable. That regulation also defines entry level status for USAR Soldiers as 180 days after beginning training. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry “Uncharacterized” from item 24 of her DD Form 214 and adding the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008847

    Original file (20130008847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her uncharacterized discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be changed to honorable or a general discharge. A memorandum, dated 7 September 1995, shows the applicant was notified of her pending USAR discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5. There is no evidence that indicates she was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed their military term of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012672

    Original file (20140012672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records to show her character of service as honorable instead of entry level status. Although the evidence of record shows she subsequently completed the requested courses and received the requested promotion, awards, and character of service, her records are void of and she failed to provide any evidence showing she served 90 days or more of continuous...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017150

    Original file (20100017150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was released from IADT under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service with an uncharacterized character of service. It states the purpose of the separation document is to provide the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020911

    Original file (20110020911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was promoted as follows: * PV1- 23 December 1988 * PV2- 22 August 1989 * PFC - no entry * SPC - 16 February 1990 7. With regard to the rank/grade of E-1 recorded on the applicants DD Form 214; she enlisted in the USAR as a PV1 on 23 December 1988 and was promoted to PV2 on 22 August 1989. Additionally, the characterization of service for USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT and are in entry level status is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001539

    Original file (20120001539.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged in the rank/grade of PV1/E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 5, by reason of physical disability that was EPTS. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, describes the different types of characterization of service. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011605

    Original file (20130011605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated the service of Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and USAR Soldiers who successfully completed a period of initial active duty for training (IADT) who were in an entry-level status would be uncharacterized, even though they completed their IADT successfully. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she completed a total of 8 months and 22 days of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...