Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007526
Original file (20130007526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	 

		BOARD DATE:	  30 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130007526 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized."  

2.  She states she completed active duty training (ADT) at Fort Sam Houston, TX, in 1993 and returned to her Connecticut Army National Guard (CTARNG) unit.  Her DD Form 214 shows the entry "uncharacterized" in item 24.  This is her only DD Form 214 since the Army National Guard (ARNG) and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) use different forms for discharges.  She feels a correction is warranted so she can pursue job opportunities that require an "honorable discharge."  

3.  She provides:

* DD Form 214
* ARNG Retirement Points History Statement
* SIDPERS (Standard Installation and Division Personnel Reporting System) STPA (Select, Train, Promote, Assign) Data Sheet
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service))
* orders
* letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 19 December 1992, the applicant enlisted in the CTARNG for a period of 6 years.  

3.  On 4 August 1993, she entered initial ADT (IADT).  On 17 December 1993, after completing IADT, which included training for military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist), she was released from active duty returned to her CTARNG unit.  

4.  Her DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 23 (Type of Separation) – "RELEASE FROM ACTIVE DUTY TRAINING"
* item 24 – "UNCHARACTERIZED"
* item 25 (Separation Authority) – "MEPS SELF-TERMINATING ORDER 249-1  DTD 921219 COURSE 91B"
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – "COMPLETION OF PERIOD OF ADT"

5.  An NGB Form 22, as amended by the NGB Form 22A she provides, shows she received a general discharge from the CTARNG on 10 January 2000.  She was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) to complete her service obligation.  Effective 1 December 2001, she was honorably discharged from the USAR.

6.  She provides, in part, a letter from the VA, dated 19 February 2013, stating it was furnished to establish her veteran's preference for civil service employment.  The letter states VA records certified she "separated under honorable conditions from active duty military service."
7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  

	a.  Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) states the service of ARNG Soldiers in an entry-level status upon completion of IADT will be uncharacterized  even though they have completed their IADT successfully.

	b.  For ARNG and USAR Soldiers, entry-level status begins upon enlistment in the ARNG or USAR.  For Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, entry-level status terminates 180 days after beginning training.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was released from active duty and returned to her CTARNG unit less than 180 days after she began IADT.  Because she was still in an entry-level status when she was released from active duty, the governing regulation required that her service be uncharacterized.  This is reflected in the appropriate item on her DD Form 214.  

2.  The VA has certified she "separated under honorable conditions from active duty military service."  This is not an indication of an error on her DD Form 214 with regard to the characterization of her service.  The VA makes determinations based on statutory authority and regulations separate from those governing Army procedures.  

3.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service.  It merely means that the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.  The applicant may want to so inform any potential employers.

4.  In the absence of evidence showing an error or injustice in this case, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007526





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007526



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011516

    Original file (20080011516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “uncharacterized” to “honorable” and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from "NA" to "RE-1." Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019524

    Original file (20100019524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The Army National Guard (ARNG) corrected her rank to show she was discharged in the rank of SPC/E-4. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending AR-PERSCOM Orders D-11-152965, dated 15 November 2001 to show her rank as SPC/E-4 and correcting any other USAR discharge documents that were issued accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028718

    Original file (20100028718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable," "under honorable conditions," or "general" rather than "uncharacterized." It specifies that "Soldiers of the ARNG and the USAR ordered to active duty for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from active duty, revert to control of the appropriate Reserve Component" and that the "service of Soldiers specified in this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502

    Original file (20060011502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014915

    Original file (20100014915.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documentary evidence in support of her application: a. a DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 November 1993; b. two DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 22 October 1993 and 2 September 1994; c. an award memorandum, dated 13 July 1996; d. Orders D-09-048434 issued by U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) on 5 September 2000; e. seven sets of active duty for training (ADT), annual training (AT), or active duty special work (ADSW) orders; f....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014447

    Original file (20090014447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She adds that her medical evaluation board (MEBD) recommended her discharge in accordance with Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations) as listed on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which is for medical reasons, and that the orders she received from the Army and National Guard Regulations are also for medical reasons. The evidence of record shows the applicant was ordered to active duty in an AGR status on 3 October 2006. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000026

    Original file (20120000026.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 December 1993 and 8 May 2000, as follows: * Item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) * Item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaigns Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal 2. The applicant provides: * 1993 and 2000 DD Forms 214 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000866

    Original file (20140000866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he entered military service on 20 May 1970 and he completed 6 years of total military service. Thus, the evidence of record shows the applicant's NGB Form 22 correctly shows the date of enlistment (20 May 1970), the date he was discharged (11 November 1973), and both his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007531

    Original file (20100007531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. The applicant's records show that she enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 16 March 1989 for a period of 8 years. Upon completion of her training, the applicant was released from active duty for training (ADT) on 22 February 1990 to her Minnesota ARNG (MNARNG) unit to complete her military service obligation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030310

    Original file (20100030310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests the characterization of her husband's active service for initial active duty for training (IADT), completed on 17 September 1992, be changed to honorable. Because the FSM was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from active duty, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. Therefore, the Board determined that...