Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018555
Original file (20130018555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130018555 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an honorable character of service.

2.  The applicant states her discharge certificate states honorable.  She wants Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) home loan benefits.

3.  The applicant provides copies of her 1993 DD Form 214 and May 1999 Honorable Discharge Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  In May 1991, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and entered Active Duty for Training (ADT) on 18 July 1991.
3.  She completed training, and she was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76P1O as a materiel control and accounting specialist.

4.  On 12 November 1993, she was released from ADT with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 4-2.  She was transferred to her USAR unit.  She served on active duty for 3 months and 25 days.

5.  On 11 May 1999, she was separated from the USAR with an honorable discharge.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Chapter 3 (Character of Service/Description of Service), paragraph 3-7a, provides, in part, the honorable characterization may be awarded to a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry-level status separation (uncharacterized) (emphasis  Added) is warranted.

	b.  Paragraph 4–2. Discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment and other periods of active duty or ADT state the service of Soldiers specified in this paragraph who are in entry-level status will be uncharacterized, even though they have completed their IADT successfully.

	c.  Section II (Terms) of the glossary states that entry-level status for Reserve Soldiers begins upon enlistment in the USAR and, for Soldiers ordered to ADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Records show the applicant commenced ADT on 18 July 1991 and she was released from ADT on 12 November 1991.  She had completed 3 months and 25 days of active service.  She was in an entry-level status when released from ADT.

2.  The regulatory guidance states an entry-level status Soldier's separation will be "uncharacterized."

3.  Records show the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, based on completion of required active service was administratively correct and in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time.  In addition, the character of service entered in item 24 of his DD Form 214 was proper and correct.

4.  An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier's military service.  It merely means the Soldier has not served on active duty long enough for his or her character of service to be rated.  In addition, the Board does not change a characterization of service solely for the purpose of allowing the period of service to be recognized as creditable service by other government agencies.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018555





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018555



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000170

    Original file (20120000170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. She completed 5 months and 9 days of active service and her service was uncharacterized. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022785

    Original file (20120022785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicant’s military records show she enlisted in the USAR on 15 April 1991 and she entered active duty for training (ADT) on 29 May 1991. Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his or her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or ADT, or where required under specific...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009947

    Original file (20110009947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of her DD Forms 214, her discharge orders from the USAR, and her request for release from the USAR. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. Therefore, the applicant's first DD Form 214 was properly prepared to reflect her ADT service as being uncharacterized and the applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with her application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007420

    Original file (20130007420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * USAR discharge orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. However, Headquarters, 5th U.S. Army, Orders 140-11, dated 24 July 1991, show she was discharged from the USAR effective 24 July 1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct), with an uncharacterized (entry-level status) separation. The available evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020333

    Original file (20130020333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 May 1991 to show "honorable" or "general, under honorable conditions" instead of "uncharacterized." Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 was a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. Though evidence shows she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003927

    Original file (20110003927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his first discharge from active duty in 1990, he was told that they couldn’t put honorable on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) because he had served less than 180 days. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. Notwithstanding the DD Form 214 of another individual submitted by the applicant, the evidence shows the applicant, as a member of the USAR, was in an entry level status during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000278

    Original file (20110000278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her date of discharge as 23 September 1993, her characterization of service as honorable, and her rank as specialist, pay grade E-4. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant enlisted in the USAR and was ordered to ADT in July 1990. Therefore, her rank as recorded on her DD Form 214 appears to be correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030310

    Original file (20100030310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests the characterization of her husband's active service for initial active duty for training (IADT), completed on 17 September 1992, be changed to honorable. Because the FSM was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from active duty, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. Therefore, the Board determined that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011516

    Original file (20080011516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “uncharacterized” to “honorable” and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from "NA" to "RE-1." Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010624

    Original file (20080010624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 12b (Separation Date this Period) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows she was separated from active duty on 4 January 1991. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.