Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017939
Original file (20130017939.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:  9 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017939 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the medical diagnosis on his Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings be changed from bipolar disorder to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 

2.  The applicant states that:

	a.  He was discharged for bipolar disorder.  He is not bipolar.  He went for treatment five times and three of the five were at PTSD clinics.  The other two were for self-safety checks.  He was sent to a military PTSD clinic in Colorado on two occasions. 

	b.  His Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) was handled thorough Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC) in early 2012.  During that time MAMC was found to have changed many diagnoses from PTSD to bipolar.  He believes that his case was one of them.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was retired due to permanent disability effective 5 July 2011 as a staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.

2.  He served two tours in Iraq and one tour in Afghanistan.  He was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal (5 Awards), and the Army Achievement Medal (2 Awards).

3.  His MEB Proceedings are not available for review.

4.  A PEB was convened on 29 March 2011.  The DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings) shows the applicant was found unfit for continued military service by reason of bipolar disorder and degenerative arthritis listed as chronic back pain.  The board recommended a combined rating of 40% and permanent disability retirement.  The applicant concurred and waived a formal hearing on his case.

5.  In support of his application, he provides copies of his medical records showing:

	a.  He was seen on 8 July 2010 at the Community Mental Health Clinic, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri.  His complaint was that he had a "bad night" and had not slept all night, and had been having suicidal thoughts, with plans of cutting his wrists.  The Assessment shows:

		(1)  Axis I:  Major Depression; Anxiety Not Otherwise Specified (NOS).

		(2)  Axis II:  OCPD (Obsessive–compulsive personality disorder).

		(3)  Axis III:  Review medical record.

		(4)  Axis IV:  social; occupational. 

		(5)  Axis V:  Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF):  75-80.

	b.  He agreed to hospitalization and was seen on 8 July 2010 at the St. Mary's Health Center, Jefferson City, Missouri.  His chief complaint was: "I don't know what's wrong so I don't know how to fix it.  I need some help to figure his out."  The Diagnostic Impression shows:

		(1)  Axis I:  Major depressive disorder, single episode.  Rule out recurrent with anxiety.  Rule out underlying generalized anxiety disorder.  History of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

		(2) Axis II:  Obsessive compulsive traits versus personality traits versus disorder.

		(3)  Axis III:  History of glucose-6-phosphates dehydrogenase deficiency.

		(4)  Axis IV:  Psychological stressors include work, family stressors.

		(5)  Axis V:  Global assessment of functioning:  35.

	c.  He was seen on 25 August 2012 at the Haven Behavioral-Pueblo, St. Mary-Corwin Medical Center.  His chief complaint was "I was hearing voices."  The diagnosis shows:

		(1)  Axis I:  Major depressive disorder with psychotic features PTSD.

		(2)  Axis II:  No diagnosis.

		(3)  Axis III:  Status low back pain.

		(4)  Axis IV:  Problems with primary support system

		(5)  Axis V:  GAF:  20. 

	d.  The Progress Notes from a 4 May 2011 examination at the Columbia, Missouri, VA Medical Center, shows on page 71 that he met the DSM-IV (Psychiatric Disorders. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) criteria for a diagnosis of PTSD.

		(1)  Axis I:  Major depressive disorder with psychotic features, PTSD.

		(2)  Axis II:  None.

		(3)  Axis III:  Chronic pain.

		(4)  Axis IV:  Occupational difficulties.

		(5)  Axis V:  Global Assessment Functioning:  55.

6.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) governs medical fitness standards for enlistment; induction; appointment, including officer procurement programs; retention; and separation, including retirement.  Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the physical evaluation board rates all disabilities using the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities.  Ratings can range from 0 to 100%, rising in increments of 10%.

7.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army acting through the ABCMR.  Paragraph 2-9 states the ABCMR begins consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends the medical diagnosis on his PEB Proceedings should be changed from bipolar disorder to PTSD.  His MEB was handled thorough MAMC in early 2012.  During that time MAMC was found to have changed many diagnoses from PTSD to bipolar.  He believes that his case was one of them.

2.  The applicant has not provided any evidence to substantiate his assertion that the medical diagnosis on his MEB was changed from PTSD to bipolar disorder.  

3.  His medical records show diagnoses of PTSD, but the MEB proceedings are not available for review.  In the absence to evidence to the contrary, the MEB/PEB process must be presumed to have been in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  __x______  __x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003593



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017939



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002462

    Original file (20150002462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (2) Axis II: No diagnosis. e. A review of his military medical records shows there was insufficient evidence to conclude that he met the medical criteria for a PTSD diagnosis and that his PEB should be changed from bipolar II disorder to PTSD. Based on the diagnosis of classical bipolar II disorder and the advisory opinion from OTSG, it appears that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that he met the medical criteria for a PTSD diagnosis that was unfitting during his active military...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01862

    Original file (PD2012 01862.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board also noted that relative contribution to impairment from the CI’s OCD, PTSD, depression, and anxiety disorders diagnosed could not be separated, therefore the Board considered the mental health conditions together in its deliberations. The examiner also noted no suicidal thoughts. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00111

    Original file (PD2009-00111.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Navy Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and determined unfit for continued Naval service. He revealed his anxiety disorder on his commissioning physical but denied any symptoms at the time and the condition was considered resolved. The CI’s condition worsened over time and the VA increased his rating to 50% effective two years after he separated from the Navy.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00611

    Original file (PD2011-00611.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA C&P examination completed on the same day as the mental health C&P noted the CI was very reluctant to answer questions. The Board agreed that the symptoms reported on the MEB examination were consistent with a §4.130 rating of 70% (occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood) considering the CI’s poor interpersonal functioning and strong history of suicidal ideation. The VA examiner noted a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00197

    Original file (PD2013 00197.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active dutySGT/E-5 (68X20 / Mental Health) medically separated for anxiety disorder condition.During a previous deployment to Iraq from September 2004 to September 2005, while on convoy, CI reported that he experienced improvised explosive blasts and saw a gunner shot by a sniper and served on body details. The anxiety disorder condition, characterized as anxiety...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01449

    Original file (PD-2013-01449.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The psychiatric narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI developed mental health (MH) symptoms of anxiety and depression with obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors while deployed. At the MEB psychiatricexaminationon 5 January 2004(approximately 2 months prior to separation), the examiner noted, “While his [the CI] mood has improved and he seems less obsessive, he continues to complain of a general sense of anxiety and depression.” On mental status examination (MSE) the CI was noted to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01338

    Original file (PD-2013-01338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On admission the CI reported worsening depression and anxiety symptoms, auditory hallucinations of people calling her name and anger episodes involving hurting herself, though she denied SI or homicidal ideation (HI). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011 00909

    Original file (PD2011 00909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION :“Disparity of rating – VA rating 70% to US Army rating 10% disability. The examiner reported no panic attacks reported or evident on examination. The PEB adjudged the schizoaffective disorder with elements of bipolar disorder condition unfitting and coded it 9211 (schizoaffective disorder), assigning a 10% disability rating.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022138

    Original file (20120022138.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB recommended the applicant's referral to a physical evaluation board (PEB). The applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show chronic PTSD as a disabling condition that did not meet retention standards effective 5 June 2007, the date of his original disability retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deletion from his MEB/PEB Proceedings of "Anxiety Disorder, NOS, fails...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00529

    Original file (PD2009-00529.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI’s reported minimum weight was 96% of the minimum expected weight based on the minimum normal BMI and remained above 85% of the MLIC desirable weight (133.5 pounds). Other than anorexia nervosa, no other ratable mental conditions were forwarded to the PEB for adjudication by the MEB psychiatry evaluation. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr....