Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005396
Original file (20130005396.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  7 November 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005396 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award).

2.  The applicant states she was awarded a second Army Achievement Medal by permanent orders (PO), dated 13 September 1990.  This award is not shown on the DD Form 214 she was issued.  She was awarded this award and worked hard to achieve it.

3.  The applicant provides copies of PO 256-001 and her DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  However, there were sufficient documents submitted by the applicant for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant was commissioned in the Regular Army on 17 October 1986.  She completed training and she was awarded area of concentration 14A (air defense artillery).  She was promoted to first lieutenant on 16 October 1992.

4.  Headquarters, 6th Battalion, 52nd Air Defense Artillery, PO 256-001, dated 13 September 1990, awarded her the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service from 15 January 1988 through 15 September 1990.  These same orders awarded another Soldier the Army Achievement Medal with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, indicating the second award.

5.  She was honorably released from active duty on 15 September 1990.  She was credited with 3 years, 10 months, and 29 days of net active duty service with no lost time.  Her DD Form 214 shows award of the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award).

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.

	a.  The Army Achievement Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

	b.  The Army Service Ribbon is awarded upon successful completion of initial entry training.  

	c.  The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995; and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs preparation of the DD Form 214.  It specifies to include all awards and decorations for all periods of service.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  PO awarded the applicant the Army Achievement Medal on 13 September 1990.  This award is not listed on her DD Form 214.  Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show this award.

2.  She completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Service Ribbon and National Defense Service Medal.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct her DD Form 214 to show these awards.

3.  With respect to adding the Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) to her DD Form 214, she provided orders awarding her the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service from 15 January 1988 through 15 September 1990.  These orders do not indicate any oak leaf clusters associated with this award.  She provided no orders showing she was awarded a second Army Achievement Medal.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to add award of the Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) to her DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards to the applicant's DD Form 214:

* Army Achievement Medal
* Army Service Ribbon
* National Defense Service Medal


2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction of her DD Form 214 to show the Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award).




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005396



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005396



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020787

    Original file (20140020787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the: * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * Humanitarian Service Medal 2. The evidence of record shows she served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following to her DD Form 214: * Armed Forces Expeditionary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011730

    Original file (20110011730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides the following documents: a. a DA Form 4980-18 (Army Achievement Medal Certificate), dated 17 July 1989, that shows Lieutenant Colonel James L. H----, Commander, 1st Battalion, 41st Infantry, awarded the applicant the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious achievement from 30 March through 9 May 1989; and b. a DA Form 4980-14 (Army Commendation Medal Certificate), dated 19 June 1990, that shows Colonel Stanley F. C----, Commander, 41st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019071

    Original file (20110019071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 6 October 2006 to show the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (6th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (4th Award) * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) 2. Her record contains two orders and she provided two additional orders showing she was awarded a total of four ARCOMs. Her record also contains...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002695

    Original file (20130002695.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 and the orders that awarded her the Army Achievement Medal show she served in Somalia from 15 May 1993 to 18 September 1993 in support of Operation Restore Hope. Additionally, the evidence of record shows her DD Form 214 omitted her service in Turkey and Somalia from item 18 of her DD Form 214; therefore she is entitled to correction of her DD form 214 to add this service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020651

    Original file (20120020651.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, periods of active duty that do not meet the eligibility requirement for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal may be used for award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal. A recent change states enlisted Soldiers ordered to active duty for 365 days or more will be awarded the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal if they complete 2 of the 3 years of qualifying service requirement, retroactive to 11 September 2001. b. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003066

    Original file (20140003066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states no record of his service in Saudi Arabia is listed on his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002232

    Original file (20150002232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Her DD Form 214 for this period of service shows award of the ARCOM (5th Award). Based on the evidence of record in this case and the evidence the applicant provides, she is entitled to the ARCOM (5th Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022767

    Original file (20110022767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 did not list a marksmanship qualification badge. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 October 2011 to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 October 2011 the: * Meritorious Service Medal (2nd Award) * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008742

    Original file (20080008742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080008742 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. By regulation, the deployed service of an active duty Soldier should be documented with an entry in Item 18 of the DD Form 214. In this case, the entry "SERVICE IN KUWAIT FROM 20050101-20050430" should be added to Item 18 of the applicant's DD Form 214 to document her service in Kuwait in support of OIF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008102

    Original file (20150008102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the removal of Permanent Orders (PO) 324-001, dated 19 November 2012, and PO 324-001, dated 26 November 2012, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). His record contains: * PO 355-07, dated 21 December 2006, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * PO 363-003, dated 16 January 2010, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) 3. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...