Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002398
Original file (20130002398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002398 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  he was an infantryman attached to K Troop, 3rd Squadron, 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment during Desert Storm; and

	b.  he feels he should have been awarded the CIB for his service during combat as an infantryman.

3.  The applicant no additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to 

timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 August 1987.  He was trained in and served in military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he served in Saudi Arabia from 15 December 1990 to 23 April 1991, while assigned for duty with Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 2nd Armored Calvary Regiment.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) does not include the CIB among his list of awards.

4.  On 7 August 1991, the applicant was honorably released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service.  He completed 3 years, 11 months, and
27 days of creditable active service.  The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued at the time does not list the CIB as an authorized award.

5.  There are no orders or other documents in the applicant’s military record to show he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving on active duty.

6.  The applicant's military record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214), dated 22 January 1993, that was issued to add other earned awards to his DD Form 214.  The CIB is not listed on this document.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards.  It states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer personnel who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s claim of entitlement to the CIB and the supporting evidence he submitted were carefully considered.  However, in order to support award of the CIB, there must be evidence not only that the member held an infantry MOS, while assigned to a qualifying infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, but in addition, that the member was present and participated as an infantry Soldier with that unit at a time when it engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.

2.  Absent any evidence showing the applicant satisfied the regulatory criteria necessary for the award of the CIB, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002398



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002398



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017540

    Original file (20070017540.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, counsel presents the following arguments: a. the Board erred in denying the applicant his CMB based on a determination that he was not assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size and that the word “or” is a mutually exclusive criterion that does not require the unit of attachment or assignment to be organic to an infantry unit; b. the medical officer’s statement and evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008114

    Original file (20080008114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) he was assigned to a unit as an infantryman and performed the duties of an infantryman. There are no orders in his official record showing he was awarded the CIB. The evidence in the official record shows the applicant held MOS 94B and performed duties as a cook while in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015714

    Original file (20090015714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record is void of any documents showing he served as a combat medic with a qualifying infantry unit or that he was recommended for or awarded the CMB or CIB by proper authority while serving in SWA. The applicant's contention he qualified for the CMB and CIB based on his combat service in SWA in support of Operation Desert Storm has been carefully considered. The evidence of record shows the applicant held a medical MOS and not an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019270

    Original file (20110019270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. he held military occupational specialties (MOS) 11B (Infantryman) and 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist) during his service in Vietnam from May - August 1968; b. he was assigned to a cavalry unit rifle squad while engaged in active dismounted ground combat many times; c. he was also engaged in combat under enemy fire with his infantry unit; and d. he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) on 18 July 1968 while he was engaged in combat. The applicant's official...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011551

    Original file (20140011551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence of record which shows he served in active ground combat. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056052C070420

    Original file (2001056052C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB; the soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and must actively participate in such ground combat. In addition, although authorized subsequent to his separation, based on his service in Southwest Asia during Operation Desert Storm, the applicant is clearly entitled to both the KLM-SA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030114

    Original file (20100030114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, did not authorize Armor/Air Cavalry officers award of the CIB although they may have served as Aero Medical Rifle Platoon Commander. The commanding officer then assigns appropriate duties. Absent any evidence of record showing that the applicant held and served in an infantry specialty in ground combat with a qualifying infantry unit during his RVN tour, or that he was awarded the CIB by proper...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003429

    Original file (20130003429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided for award of the CIB to infantry personnel who were members of infantry platoons and squads in armored cavalry squadrons and regiments. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he met the criteria for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017106

    Original file (20100017106.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in his records that show he was awarded the CIB. However, there is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was awarded the CIB or that he was assigned to an infantry unit or that he was an active participant in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001922

    Original file (20130001922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides a request for award of the CIB from the Assistant Adjutant, Headquarters, 58th Infantry Brigade (Separate), Maryland Army National Guard, dated 28 April 1980, which states: * the approximate dates were 20 September 1970 to 22 October 1970 * he commanded Battery B, 1st Battalion, 77th Field Artillery Regiment * his unit was in direct support of 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 2nd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division * the commander of the 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment,...