Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003429
Original file (20130003429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    24 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003429 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states, while in Vietnam, he held an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and he was engaged in combat.

3.  The applicant indicated he submitted his Service Personnel Records (201 File) in support of his application.  However, no supporting documentation was received with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

 

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 September 1968 and he was awarded MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) upon completion of initial entry training.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 16 August 1969 to 15 August 1970.  Item 
38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served with Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry and with B Troop, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry while in Vietnam.

4.  The CIB is not included in the list of awards in item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20.

5.  His military records are void of orders or any other documents that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

6.  He was honorably released from active duty on 27 August 1971.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided for award of the CIB to infantry personnel who were members of infantry platoons and squads in armored cavalry squadrons and regiments.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should be awarded the CIB has been carefully considered.

2.  The evidence shows he was awarded an infantry MOS.  However, it does not sufficiently show he engaged in active ground combat.  Additionally, there is no evidence showing served with an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size or that he was a member of an infantry platoon while assigned to the 1st Cavalry.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he met the criteria for award of the CIB.

3.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003429



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003429



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030114

    Original file (20100030114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, did not authorize Armor/Air Cavalry officers award of the CIB although they may have served as Aero Medical Rifle Platoon Commander. The commanding officer then assigns appropriate duties. Absent any evidence of record showing that the applicant held and served in an infantry specialty in ground combat with a qualifying infantry unit during his RVN tour, or that he was awarded the CIB by proper...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000475

    Original file (20150000475.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Appendix V provided guidance for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and stated that a rifle squad or cavalry platoon satisfied the infantry type unit of regimental size or smaller requirement for award of the CIB. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was assigned as an infantryman with an infantry company.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002588

    Original file (20140002588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows he served in duty specialty 1981 (rotary wing aviation unit commander) in Vietnam while assigned to: * Troop D, 3d Squadron, 5th Cavalry Regiment, from 9 May 1970 to 31 January 1971 * Troop C, 3d Squadron, 17th Cavalry Regiment, from 1 February 1971 to 27 April 1971 4. However, the governing regulation for award of the CIB clearly establishes that the CIB may be awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017540

    Original file (20070017540.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, counsel presents the following arguments: a. the Board erred in denying the applicant his CMB based on a determination that he was not assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size and that the word “or” is a mutually exclusive criterion that does not require the unit of attachment or assignment to be organic to an infantry unit; b. the medical officer’s statement and evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006538

    Original file (20110006538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fellow Soldier attests: * he served with the applicant in the Army at Fort Hood, TX, and in Vietnam * he and the applicant served in Troop C, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry, 1st Armored Division, at Fort Hood, TX, from approximately January 1967 until their deployment to Vietnam in August 1967 * the applicant functioned and served in the capacity of an armored intelligence specialist in MOS 11D * cavalry troopers assigned to armored cavalry assault vehicles (ACAV's) carried MOS 11B (Light...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010721

    Original file (20090010721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records do not show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, but he served in MOS 11D with the 3rd Squadron, 5th Cavalry Regiment during his tour in Vietnam and orders awarded him the Army Commendation Medal with "V" (for Valor) Device for heroism on 29 March 1969. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show the award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015281

    Original file (20140015281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the CIB and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence also shows he participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge; and c. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008561

    Original file (20100008561.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further provided a copy of a letter, dated 22 February 2010 wherein a former member of Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, Medical Platoon, 1st Squadron, 1st Armored Cavalry Regiment, stated he served as a 91C and all members of the medical platoon were awarded the Combat Medical Badge for providing support in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Medical Badge is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017117

    Original file (20110017117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant was awarded or entitled to award of the CIB. Although the evidence of record shows he was assigned to 1st Cavalry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division in MOS 11D, there is no evidence to show he was personally present while the unit was engaged in active ground combat and he actively participated in such ground combat or that he was assigned to an infantry platoon or squad. ...