Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019270
Original file (20110019270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  10 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019270 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  he held military occupational specialties (MOS) 11B (Infantryman) and 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist) during his service in Vietnam from May - August 1968;

	b.  he was assigned to a cavalry unit rifle squad while engaged in active dismounted ground combat many times; 

   c.  he was also engaged in combat under enemy fire with his infantry unit; and
   
   d.  he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) on 18 July 1968 while he was engaged in combat.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 4 December 1967.  He was trained in and awarded MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 15 May to 3 August 1968, with A Troop, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment and that he performed the duties of a "senior scout observer" in MOS 11D.  Item 35 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the CIB.

4.  Headquarters, 24th Evacuation Hospital, published General Orders 
Number 147 on 19 July 1968.  It announced the applicant's award of the PH for injuries sustained as a result of enemy action.

5.  The applicant's official military personnel file is void of any orders or documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service.

6.  On 3 December 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty by reason of expiration of his term of service in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.  He completed 2 years of total active service.  

7.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not include the CIB among the awards listed.  Item 30 (Remarks) includes an entry which shows the applicant's 4th finger was broken and little finger was lost as a result of being wounded in the RVN on 18 July 1968.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 8-6 contains guidance on the CIB criteria and requires that the member was an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; that he was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit was engaged in active ground combat; and that he was present with his qualifying infantry unit and actively participated in such ground combat.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his record should be corrected to show the CIB.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS.  However, he was assigned to an Armored Cavalry Regiment where he performed duty in a troop unit as a senior scout.  Unfortunately, this service is not recognized as having performed duty with an infantry unit  of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.

3.  In view of the above, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

4.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action related to award of the CIB in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019270





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019270



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017117

    Original file (20110017117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant was awarded or entitled to award of the CIB. Although the evidence of record shows he was assigned to 1st Cavalry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division in MOS 11D, there is no evidence to show he was personally present while the unit was engaged in active ground combat and he actively participated in such ground combat or that he was assigned to an infantry platoon or squad. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011551

    Original file (20140011551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence of record which shows he served in active ground combat. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006538

    Original file (20110006538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fellow Soldier attests: * he served with the applicant in the Army at Fort Hood, TX, and in Vietnam * he and the applicant served in Troop C, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry, 1st Armored Division, at Fort Hood, TX, from approximately January 1967 until their deployment to Vietnam in August 1967 * the applicant functioned and served in the capacity of an armored intelligence specialist in MOS 11D * cavalry troopers assigned to armored cavalry assault vehicles (ACAV's) carried MOS 11B (Light...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017037

    Original file (20070017037.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for a qualifying period from 14 June 1965 through 27 March 1968; and b. adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015622C080407

    Original file (20070015622C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It further found that he held and served in a armor MOS while assigned to Korea and as a result, even had the CIB been authorized for Korea at the time, he was not eligible to receive the award. In his letter, the applicant argues that although his separation document (DD Form 214) showed he held the MOS 11D, he was totally an infantry reconnaissance (Recon) Scout (a foot Soldier) during the 13 months he served on the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) in Korea. The evidence of record confirms the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002569

    Original file (20140002569 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002569

    Original file (20140002569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015606C071029

    Original file (20060015606C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence must show that an applicant held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size, and must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to this infantry unit. While there is evidence the applicant served in the MOS 11C, an infantry MOS, there is no evidence he held an infantry MOS and that he was ever assigned or attached to an infantry unit of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003926

    Original file (20090003926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS). There is no evidence to show what subordinate unit of the 11th ACR the applicant was assigned to. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015714

    Original file (20090015714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record is void of any documents showing he served as a combat medic with a qualifying infantry unit or that he was recommended for or awarded the CMB or CIB by proper authority while serving in SWA. The applicant's contention he qualified for the CMB and CIB based on his combat service in SWA in support of Operation Desert Storm has been carefully considered. The evidence of record shows the applicant held a medical MOS and not an infantry MOS.