Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011551
Original file (20140011551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140011551 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states:

* he should have been issued the CIB for his service in Vietnam
* he was assigned to Troop A, 10th Cavalry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, as a scout observer
* he was told his CIB was coming, but he never received it

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 March 1970 for 2 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11D (armor reconnaissance specialist).

3.  His DA Form 20 shows he served in MOS 11D while assigned to Troop A, 1st Squadron, 10th Cavalry, 4th Infantry Division, from 11 August 1970 to 28 July 1971 in Vietnam.

4.  On 20 December 1971, he was honorably released from active duty.

5.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the CIB as an authorized award.

6.  There are no orders for the CIB in the applicant's available records.

7.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show the CIB as an authorized award.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; he must be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the governing regulation for award of the CIB clearly establishes that the CIB may be awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry specialty.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.

2.  The evidence shows the applicant held and served in an infantry MOS while assigned to Troop A, 1st Squadron, 10th Cavalry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, during his assignment in Vietnam.  However, there is no evidence of record which shows he served in active ground combat.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011551



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140011551



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001354

    Original file (20140001354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that during the Vietnam Conflict, only enlisted Soldiers who held and served in an infantry unit in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H were eligible for award of the CIB. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded the CIB. Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, the available evidence is insufficient to support the applicant's request for correction of his records to show award of CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005317

    Original file (20130005317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007538

    Original file (20100007538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the original proceedings, the Board determined that while the applicant did hold a qualifying MOS and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, the available evidence was insufficient to establish that the applicant had served in active ground combat. The author states that he received the Combat Infantryman Badge and believes the applicant should also receive this badge because he did everything that was asked of him. The applicant contends that his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002569

    Original file (20140002569 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002569

    Original file (20140002569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017117

    Original file (20110017117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant was awarded or entitled to award of the CIB. Although the evidence of record shows he was assigned to 1st Cavalry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division in MOS 11D, there is no evidence to show he was personally present while the unit was engaged in active ground combat and he actively participated in such ground combat or that he was assigned to an infantry platoon or squad. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021167

    Original file (20130021167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). On 26 June 1970, the applicant was assigned to C Troop, 3rd Cavalry Reconnaissance Squadron, 4th Cavalry Regiment, 25th Infantry Division for duty as an automotive repair parts specialist. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was not awarded an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010226

    Original file (20120010226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The evidence of record confirms the applicant held an infantry MOS and he was assigned as an 11C ammunition bearer in a cavalry unit during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017110

    Original file (20090017110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant states he was awarded the CIB and he believes the evidence is in his Military Personnel Records Jacket. _________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017540

    Original file (20070017540.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, counsel presents the following arguments: a. the Board erred in denying the applicant his CMB based on a determination that he was not assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size and that the word “or” is a mutually exclusive criterion that does not require the unit of attachment or assignment to be organic to an infantry unit; b. the medical officer’s statement and evidence that...