Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002223
Original file (20130002223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  5 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002223 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the narrative reason for separation on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Hardship." 

2.  The applicant states her narrative reason for separation should be changed from "sole parent" to "hardship" so that she may be eligible for healthcare benefits.

3.  The applicant provides her DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 April 1992.  She completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 88M (Motor Transport Operator).  

3.  On 3 February 1993, the applicant requested separation from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 6-3b(1) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of hardship discharge.  

4.  On 3 February 1993, the applicant’s commander recommended approval of the applicant’s request.  

5.  On 15 February 1993, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation for hardship for being a sole parent in accordance with chapter 6-3b of Army Regulation 635-200 and directed her term of service be characterized as honorable.  Accordingly, the applicant was honorably released from active duty on 3 March 1993 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete her remaining service obligation.  The DD Form 
214 she was issued at the time confirms she completed 11 months and 1 day of active military service.  Item 25 (Separation Authority) shows the entry "AR 
635-200, para 6-3b(2)."  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) shows the entry “Sole parent."

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 6 of Army Regulation 635-200 governs separation because of dependency or hardship.  Paragraph 6-3b(2) provides that Soldiers who are sole parents, and whose child or children under 18 years of age reside within the household, may apply for separation under hardship.  A "sole parent" is defined as a parent who is single by reason of never having been married, or is divorced or legally separated and has been awarded child custody by judicial decree or court order, or is a widow/widower.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The ABCMR does not grant requests to change properly-assigned narrative reasons for separation solely for the purpose of making an applicant eligible for benefits.  Every case is individually decided based upon its merits when an applicant requests a change in his or her discharge.  

2.  The applicant contends that her narrative reason for separation should be changed from sole parent to hardship.  After reviewing the applicant's request for separation it was determined that the separation authority approved her voluntary request for hardship discharge and directed that she be issued an honorable discharge.  Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 6-3b(2), Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of "sole parent."   A sole parenthood separation is a valid subcategory of a hardship separation.

3.  Records clearly show the applicant voluntarily requested discharge from the Army due to being a sole parent.  All requirements of law and regulation were met, and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002223



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002223



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089016C070403

    Original file (2003089016C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 11 May 1994, the applicant submitted a request for a chapter 6, hardship discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that she was released from active duty on 3 June 1994 under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(2) and her service was characterized as honorable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011372

    Original file (20130011372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel. The SPD code MDF is the correct code for Soldiers voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8, by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and SPD code MDB is the correct code for Soldier's voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows the applicant became pregnant and underwent pregnancy counseling as required by the applicable regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009141

    Original file (20090009141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 July 2008, the applicant requested separation under the provisions of paragraph 8-1 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. The "MDF" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (voluntary) under chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and the SPD "MDB" is the correct code for Soldier's separating (voluntary) under chapter 6 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows that the applicant became...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001599

    Original file (AR20080001599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2007, the intermediate commander recommended separation from the service under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 6, Paragraph 6-3b(2) for Sole Parent, with an honorable discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008044

    Original file (20090008044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from sole parent to hardship. It appears that at the time of the applicant's separation, separation code MDG was entered item 26 to assist the Army with statistical data on Soldiers separating from the service by reason of sole parenthood. However, this separation code and narrative reason prohibits the applicant from receiving the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016987

    Original file (20100016987.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 May 1983, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy and directed her service be characterized as honorable. Her DD Form 214 confirms she was discharged under the provisions of chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 with a narrative reason of separation as "pregnancy" and a separation code of "MDF." Furthermore, there is no evidence the applicant voluntarily requested separation for hardship.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012850

    Original file (20130012850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum, undated, contained in the applicant's military personnel file, shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge due to the premature birth of her daughter. It states that the SPD code MDG is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(1), by reason of parenthood. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated due to hardship, but the specific reason for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019506

    Original file (20120019506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested and was granted separation due to pregnancy. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she was honorably relieved from active duty and transferred the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 8 with a narrative reason for separation of pregnancy. The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any evidence that her separation should have been under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000048367

    Original file (2000048367.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Per her request, the applicant was separated by reason of “Parenthood.” The Board found no errors in the applicant’s DD 214 and determined that the DD 214 properly reflects the reason and authority for discharge. AR Number: 2000048367 INDEX NUMBERS: A0155 Date of Review: 001101 A0100 Character of Service: HD A9500 Date of Discharge: 940603 Authority: AR 6335-200 C6 Reason: A1500 Results of Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006511

    Original file (20080006511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 February 1997, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge, under the provisions of chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of parenthood, inability to provide an adequate Family Care Plan and directed the applicant be furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate. Paragraph 5-8 of Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, governed separation because of parenthood. Under this provision for hardship discharge, parenthood of married service members and sole...