Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012850
Original file (20130012850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  20 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012850 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the narrative reason for separation on her 
DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 9 September 1994 be changed to hardship instead of parenthood.

2.  She states she got out of the Army because she and her spouse were both being deployed to Haiti.  She adds that at the time, their premature daughter was scheduled to have surgery.  She was also going to live with her parents in CA while she and her spouse were deployed.  She states she needed a few days to get her daughter situated, but after confronting her "supervisor" she was given an ultimatum to choose her daughter or the military.  She adds she also sought advice from the Chaplain who informed her that it would be a hardship for her to be in Haiti without knowing the status of her daughter.

3.  She provides her self-authored statement and her DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having prior U.S. Army Reserve Service, on 30 June 1993, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.

3.  A memorandum, undated, contained in the applicant's military personnel file, shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge due to the premature birth of her daughter.  In her memorandum she explained that she and her spouse were both in the military and it was difficult for them to try and run their daughter back and forth to the hospital.  She said because she was in the Army, she had dropped her child off in CA which was very hard for her to do.  She also said that she did not think she would be able to devote her attention or give her full effort to the Army because her daughter was her primary concern.

4.  Her DD Form 214 shows she was honorably discharged on 9 September 1994 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 6-3b(1) parenthood.  Item 26 (Separation Code) shows she was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of "MDG." She was credited with completing 1 year, 2 months, and 10 days of active service this period.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 6 provides for the separation because of dependency or hardship:

   a.  Paragraph 6-3b states that hardship exists when in circumstances not involving death or disability of a member of the Soldier’s (or spouse’s) immediate family, separation from the Service will materially affect the care or support of the family by alleviating undue and genuine hardship.
   
   b.  Paragraph 6-3b(1) Parenthood of married Soldiers states a married Soldier who becomes a parent by birth, adoption or marriage (stepparent), and whose child (or children) under 18 years of age reside within the household, may apply for separation under hardship.  The Soldier must submit evidence that the roles of parent and Soldier are incompatible and that they cannot fulfill their military obligation without neglecting the child or children.  



6.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states that the SPD code MDG is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(1), by reason of parenthood.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated due to hardship, but the specific reason for the hardship was parenthood.  Further, she was assigned an SPD code of MDG which is consistent with the reason for separation.  Therefore, her DD Form 214 is correct as constituted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012850





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012850



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008044

    Original file (20090008044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from sole parent to hardship. It appears that at the time of the applicant's separation, separation code MDG was entered item 26 to assist the Army with statistical data on Soldiers separating from the service by reason of sole parenthood. However, this separation code and narrative reason prohibits the applicant from receiving the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064596C070421

    Original file (2001064596C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That item 26 (Separation Code) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to show Separation Program Designator (SPD) code “LDG” or “JDG” instead of “MDG.” Evidence of record shows the applicant voluntarily requested a hardship discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(1), by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089016C070403

    Original file (2003089016C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 11 May 1994, the applicant submitted a request for a chapter 6, hardship discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that she was released from active duty on 3 June 1994 under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(2) and her service was characterized as honorable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008405

    Original file (20080008405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 December 1990, the applicant requested separation from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 6-3b of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of hardship/parenthood. The "MDG" Separation code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 6-3 of Army Regulation 635-200, Parenthood. The evidence of record shows that the applicant requested separation from the Army by reason of parenthood.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061176C070421

    Original file (2001061176C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001599

    Original file (AR20080001599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2007, the intermediate commander recommended separation from the service under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 6, Paragraph 6-3b(2) for Sole Parent, with an honorable discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104930

    Original file (AR2004104930.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 6, paragraph 6-3b(1), AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of honorable. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 6, Paragraph 6-3b(1), AR 635-200, by reason parenthood with a characterization of service of honorable. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002941

    Original file (20130002941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to change the narrative reason for her separation from "Pregnancy Discharge - Overseas Separation" to "Hardship." The complete facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's separation were not available to the Board; however, the applicant's record contains Orders 118-6, issued by the 369th Personnel Service Company, dated 8 June 1988, which show she received an approved overseas separation and an approved chapter 8 (Separation of Enlisted Women for Pregnancy)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002223

    Original file (20130002223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the narrative reason for separation on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Hardship." On 3 February 1993, the applicant requested separation from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 6-3b(1) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of hardship discharge. On 15 February 1993, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation for hardship for being a sole parent in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011372

    Original file (20130011372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel. The SPD code MDF is the correct code for Soldiers voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8, by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and SPD code MDB is the correct code for Soldier's voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows the applicant became pregnant and underwent pregnancy counseling as required by the applicable regulation.