Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019506
Original file (20120019506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 June 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019506 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the narrative reason for separation be changed to hardship.

2.  The applicant states she was discharged due to complication of pregnancy and her constant placement on bed rest.  She was told that her discharge was considered a hardship discharge but her DD Form 214 ( Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not show this.

3.  The applicant provides copies of her DD Form 214 and her Ready Reserve discharge order. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Army as a Chapel Activities Specialist from 18 June 1984 through 13 June 1985, a period of 11 months and 26 days.

3.  The applicant's available service medical records do not contain any documentation of any complications from her pregnancy.

4.  The applicant requested and was granted separation due to pregnancy.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she was honorably relieved from active duty and transferred the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 8 with a narrative reason for separation of pregnancy.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  It provides at:

	a.  Chapter 6, for discharge or release because of genuine dependency or hardship.  Hardship is defined as when in circumstances not involving death or disability of a member of the Soldier's (or spouse's) immediate family, separation from the Service will materially affect the care or support of the family by alleviating undue and genuine hardship. 

		(1) Parenthood of married Soldiers.  A married Soldier who becomes a parent by birth, adoption, or marriage (stepparent) and whose child (or children) is less than 18 years of age and resides within the household, may apply for separation under hardship.  The Soldier must submit evidence that the roles of parent and Soldier are incompatible and that the Soldier cannot fulfill his/her military obligation without neglecting the child or children. 

		(2) Sole parents.  Soldiers who are sole parents and whose children are under 18 years of age and reside within the household, may apply for separation under hardship.  A "sole parent" is defined as a parent who is single by reason of never having been married, or who is divorced or legally separated and has been awarded child custody by judicial decree or court order, or who is a widow/widower. 

	b.  Chapter 8 establishes policy and procedures and provides authority for separation of enlisted women because of pregnancy.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While problems arising from parenthood may create a hardship warranting separation; pregnancy in and of itself is not a reason for a hardship separation.  Separation for pregnancy is a voluntary act on the part of a pregnant woman and covered by different regulatory provisions from hardship separations. 

2.  By her own admission, the applicant was released from active duty due to her pregnancy.  

3.  The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any evidence that her separation should have been under chapter 6 as a hardship separation. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019506





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019506



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011372

    Original file (20130011372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel. The SPD code MDF is the correct code for Soldiers voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8, by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and SPD code MDB is the correct code for Soldier's voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows the applicant became pregnant and underwent pregnancy counseling as required by the applicable regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089016C070403

    Original file (2003089016C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 11 May 1994, the applicant submitted a request for a chapter 6, hardship discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that she was released from active duty on 3 June 1994 under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(2) and her service was characterized as honorable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009141

    Original file (20090009141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 July 2008, the applicant requested separation under the provisions of paragraph 8-1 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. The "MDF" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (voluntary) under chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and the SPD "MDB" is the correct code for Soldier's separating (voluntary) under chapter 6 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows that the applicant became...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002941

    Original file (20130002941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to change the narrative reason for her separation from "Pregnancy Discharge - Overseas Separation" to "Hardship." The complete facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's separation were not available to the Board; however, the applicant's record contains Orders 118-6, issued by the 369th Personnel Service Company, dated 8 June 1988, which show she received an approved overseas separation and an approved chapter 8 (Separation of Enlisted Women for Pregnancy)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013889

    Original file (20140013889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 November 1990, the applicant requested separation from the U.S. Army under paragraph 5-8, Army Regulation 635-200. On 14 December 1990, consistent with the recommendations of the applicant's chain of command, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8, for the inability to perform prescribed duties due to parenthood with an honorable characterization of service. Every case is individually decided based upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016987

    Original file (20100016987.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 May 1983, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy and directed her service be characterized as honorable. Her DD Form 214 confirms she was discharged under the provisions of chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 with a narrative reason of separation as "pregnancy" and a separation code of "MDF." Furthermore, there is no evidence the applicant voluntarily requested separation for hardship.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006511

    Original file (20080006511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 February 1997, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge, under the provisions of chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of parenthood, inability to provide an adequate Family Care Plan and directed the applicant be furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate. Paragraph 5-8 of Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, governed separation because of parenthood. Under this provision for hardship discharge, parenthood of married service members and sole...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012850

    Original file (20130012850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum, undated, contained in the applicant's military personnel file, shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge due to the premature birth of her daughter. It states that the SPD code MDG is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(1), by reason of parenthood. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated due to hardship, but the specific reason for the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001599

    Original file (AR20080001599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2007, the intermediate commander recommended separation from the service under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 6, Paragraph 6-3b(2) for Sole Parent, with an honorable discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008044

    Original file (20090008044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from sole parent to hardship. It appears that at the time of the applicant's separation, separation code MDG was entered item 26 to assist the Army with statistical data on Soldiers separating from the service by reason of sole parenthood. However, this separation code and narrative reason prohibits the applicant from receiving the...