Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022348
Original file (20120022348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  11 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022348 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice specialist (SPC)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states he should have had his E-5 back before he retired.  The company and battalion failed to send the paperwork in for him to receive his E-5. 

3.  The applicant provides a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), and a DA Form 2142 (Pay Inquiry).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having had both active and Reserve service, the applicant's records show he was promoted to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 on 1 August 1990.  He entered active duty as a member of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 March 2000.  He was assigned to the Headquarters Service Company (HSC), 844th Engineer Battalion, Gray, TN. 

3.  The applicant provided and his records contain a DA Form 2627, dated 10 August 2005, wherein it shows he received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ for disobeying a lawful order by wrongfully consuming alcohol on or near Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, on or about 13 July 2005.

4.  The punishment imposed was reduction to SPC/E-4, forfeiture of $978 per month for 2 months, extra duty for 45 days, and restriction for 45 days.  The forfeiture, extra duty, and restriction were suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before 1 December 2005.  He was accordingly reduced to SPC/E-4.

5.  The applicant provided a DA Form 4187, dated 20 June 2006, from his company commander thru the Commander, 844th Engineer Battalion and the Commander, 3397th Garrison Support Command, to the 81st Regional Readiness Command, wherein it states "According to DA Form 2627, Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ, is suspended and automatically remitted if not vacated before 1 December 2005.  Reduction for [The Applicant] to SPC/E-4 has been lifted.  Effective date of promotion to SGT/E-5 is 1 December 2005."  

6.  The applicant also provided a DA Form 2142, dated 20 September 2006, signed by the applicant and his company commander, wherein it states "Per attached DA Form 2627, Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ, Soldier is to be reinstated to his previous rank of E-5 on 1 December 2005 with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 December 2005.  This form does not show it was ever processed or received by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service.

7.  Orders C-10-691676, dated 4 October 2006, issued by the U.S. Army Resources Command (HRC) released him from active duty effective 31 January 2007 and placed him on the Retired List on 1 February 2007 in the rank/grade of SPC/E-4, in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3914.  These orders show his rank as SPC and the effective date of his current grade as 10 August 2005.


8.  He was honorably retired on 31 January 2007 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired).  He was placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 on 1 February 2007.  

9.  Items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued for this period of service contain the entries "SPC" and "E-4," respectively.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3914 states under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, an enlisted member of the Army who has at least 20, but less than 30, years of service computed under section 3925 of this title may, upon his request, be retired. 

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) sets policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the force while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Soldiers for a variety of reasons.  

	a.  Paragraph 12-3 states Soldiers of the Regular Army must be on active duty when they retire.  There is no statutory requirement that Army National Guard or U.S. Army Reserve Soldiers be on active duty when they retire.  Retirement normally will be in the regular or reserve grade the Soldier holds on the date of retirement (Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3963).

	b.  For the purpose of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3963, the highest grade held satisfactorily pertains to Reserve enlisted members reduced in grade not as a result of the member’s misconduct.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3963 (Highest grade held satisfactorily: Reserve enlisted members reduced in grade not as a result of the member's misconduct) states in:

	a.  A Reserve enlisted member of the Army described in subsection (b) who is retired under section 3914 of this title shall be retired in the highest enlisted grade in which the member served on active duty satisfactorily as determined by the Secretary of the Army.

	b.  This section applies to a Reserve enlisted member who (1) at the time of retirement is serving on active duty in a grade lower than the highest enlisted grade held by the member while on active; and (2) was previously administratively reduced in grade not as a result of the member's own misconduct, as determined by the Secretary of the Army.

	c.  This section applies with respect to Reserve enlisted members who are retired under section 3914 of this title after 30 September 1996.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of confirms that on 10 August 2005, as a result of NJP imposed under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ, the applicant was reduced from SGT to SPC.  Although his immediate commander may have misread the DA Form 2627 and submitted a request for his rank to be reinstated to SGT, his DA Form 2627 clearly shows that only the portion of the NJP that pertained to forfeiture, extra duty, and restriction was suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before 1 December 2005.  Therefore, his rank was not reinstated to SGT as there was no basis to do so.

2.  The DD Form 214 he was issued on 31 January 2007 correctly reflects his rank/grade as SPC/E-4; the rank/grade he held at the time of his release from active duty.  

3.  On 1 February 2007, he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of SPC.  By law, a Soldier is placed on Retired List in the highest grade satisfactorily held. As he was reduced from SGT to SPC as a result of NJP, he did not satisfactorily serve as a SGT/E-5.  He was correctly placed on the Retired List in the rank of SPC.

4.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 



are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022348





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022348



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010831

    Original file (20110010831.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Having had prior active enlisted service from 2 August 1965 to 1 August 1968 and 13 January 1970 to 18 May 1974 (he was discharged as a specialist five (SP5)/E5), the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Massachusetts ARNG (MAARNG) on 8 March 1979 for 3 years in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5. Title 10, USC, section 3963 (Highest grade held satisfactorily: Reserve enlisted member reduced in grade not as a result of the member's misconduct) states a Reserve enlisted member of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011375

    Original file (20070011375.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 June 1996, the applicant requested active duty retirement with an effective date of 31 January 1997. Chapter 12 sets policies and procedures for voluntary retirement of Soldiers because of length of service and governs the retirement of Soldiers (Active Army, Army National Guard, and United States Army Reserve) who are retiring in their enlisted status. The applicant's retired pay is based on his retired grade of rank of SGT/E-5 as shown in Orders 161-2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068810C070402

    Original file (2002068810C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 12-3b(1) contains the general provisions of law governing retirement and it states in pertinent part, that ARNG soldiers serving on active duty at the time of their retirement, in a grade lower than their highest active duty enlisted grade, who were administratively reduced, not as a result of their own misconduct, will retire in the highest grade in which they satisfactorily served on active duty in accordance with Title 10 of the United States Code, section 3963 (10 USC 3963). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019663

    Original file (20090019663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct rank at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). There is no evidence, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, to show that he was promoted to SGT subsequent to his reduction to SPC and prior to the date of his discharge from the USAR on 19 November 2008. Based on the foregoing and the available evidence, it is concluded that the applicant's rank is correct as shown on his discharge orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025066

    Original file (20110025066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 June 1995 * promotion orders to SFC/E-7 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SFC/E-7 on 1 October 1992 and she served in this rank until 30 June 1995. Since there is no evidence of record which shows her service in the rank of SFC was not satisfactory, and in accordance with the governing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013481

    Original file (20100013481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 September 2007, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, published Orders P09-791175 retiring the applicant and placing him on the Retired List in his retired rank/grade of SGT/E-5 effective 23 July 2007, the date he turned age 60, in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731. In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 12 April 1971 and held that grade until his honorable discharge on 25 March 1974. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006244

    Original file (20120006244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. He recently received correspondence from the recorder of the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) informing him that it appears he should have been placed on the Retired List in the grade of E-7 and he should apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for review of his case. 10 USC, section 3964 (Higher grade after 30 years of service: warrant officers and enlisted members), provides that each retired member of the Army covered by subsection (b) who is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011335

    Original file (20140011335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Retired Orders Number C-05-494313 and amendment * DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service-for Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes) * Marriage certificate * Enlisted Record Brief * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 31 January 1999, 31 October 1994, 12 September 1990, and 30 March 1993 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * Orders 02-182-00032, reduction to SFC/E-7 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002803

    Original file (20080002803.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002803 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in a modified application, that his records be corrected to show his retired rank and grade as Sergeant First Class (SFC), E-7, with all due retired pay. Since the evidence of record shows that the applicant was administratively reduced to SSG, E-6, not as a result of his own misconduct, it appears that he met the criteria outlined in Title 10,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084644C070212

    Original file (2003084644C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document confirms that when he was honorably REFRAD on 11 September 1984, he held the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6, and that he had satisfactorily served in that rank and pay grade for the entire 6 year and 2 month period of active duty service documented by this separation document. In this case, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 and satisfactorily served on active duty in that grade from 12 July 1978 to 11 September 1984. That all of the...