| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Roger W. Able | Member | |
| Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be advanced to the rank and pay grade of staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6) on the Retired List.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he served on active duty and in a Reserve status with the United States Army Reserve (USAR) and the Army National Guard (ARNG). He claims that he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 in 1975, while serving in the Missouri ARNG and voluntarily accepted an administrative reduction to the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5) in June 1985, in order to accept an active duty position in an Army Guard/Reserve (AGR) status. He contends that since this reduction was not due to misconduct and he has now reached the 30 year service requirement for advancement on the Retired List, he would like to be advanced to the highest grade he held on the Retired List. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214), his administrative reduction orders from SSG/E-6 to SGT/E-5, a letter of commendation, orders awarding him the Missouri National Guard Commendation Ribbon, and a copy of a leave and earnings statement (LES) confirming that he was paid as a SSG/E-6 for a period of active duty service in November 1975.
4. The applicant’s military records show that on 31 March 1997, while serving on active duty in an AGR status, he was honorably release from active duty (REFRAD). At the time of his REFRAD, he had completed a total of 20 years and 26 days of active military service. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his separation confirms that he was separated for the purpose of retirement, under the provisions of chapter 12, Army Regulation 635-200, and that he held the rank and pay grade of SGT/E-5 on the date of his REFRAD.
5. The applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) confirms that he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 on 24 June 1971. Orders Number 10-1, dated 16 June 1980, issued by Headquarters, 175th Military Police Battalion, Missouri ARNG, authorized the applicant’s voluntary administrative reduction from SSG/E-6 to SGT/E-5, in order to allow him to accept an active duty AGR position.
6. Orders Number 020-002, dated 20 January 1997, issued by Headquarters, Missouri ARNG, Office of the Adjutant General, authorized the applicant’s REFRAD for the purpose of retirement on 31 March 1997, and his placement on the Retired List the following day. It also authorized his placement on the Retired List in the retired rank and pay grade of SGT/E-5.
7. National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200, establishes the standards, policies and procedures for the management of ARNG enlisted soldiers and specifically the policy for enlisted promotion, appointment, and reduction. Paragraph 6-35(d), in effect, at the time provides that a soldier may volunteer for reduction to any lower rank in order to obtain a benefit or for personal preference.
8. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 12 sets policies and procedures for voluntary retirement because of length of service. Paragraph 12-3b(1) contains the general provisions of law governing retirement and it states in pertinent part, that ARNG soldiers serving on active duty at the time of their retirement, in a grade lower than their highest active duty enlisted grade, who were administratively reduced, not as a result of their own misconduct, will retire in the highest grade in which they satisfactorily served on active duty in accordance with Title 10 of the United States Code, section 3963 (10 USC 3963).
9. 10 USC 3963 (Highest grade held satisfactorily, Reserve enlisted members reduced in grade not as a result of the member's misconduct) contains the legal authority for placing a Reserve enlisted member of the Army or a member of the National Guard on full-time National Guard duty, who is retired under section 3914 this title after 30 September 1996, on the Retired List in the highest enlisted grade in which the member served on active duty satisfactorily.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he should be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade he held on active duty and finds this claim has merit.
2. By regulation, ARNG soldiers who retire from active duty are entitled to be placed on the Retired List in the highest grade in which they satisfactorily served on active duty. In this case, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 and satisfactorily served on active duty in that grade prior to being administratively reduced to SGT/E-5.
3. In addition, the record verifies that the applicant’s reduction to SGT/E-5 was a voluntary administrative action and was not the result of any misconduct on his part. Therefore, the Board concludes that the applicant should have been placed on the Retired List in the highest grade in which he satisfactorily served on active duty, SSG/E-6, effective 1 April 1997, the date he was placed on the Retired List. Further, it concludes that it would be appropriate to correct this error at this time and to provide him any back pay and allowances due as a result.
4. Although the Board has no authority to correct State ARNG records, governed under Title 32, the Board is of the opinion that so far as the Department of the Army is concerned, it would be in the best interest of justice to correct the ARNG records of the individual concerned as recommended below
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the authorized retired grade of the individual concerned was SSG/E-6 and that he was placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade on 1 April 1997; and by providing him any back pay and allowances due as result of this correction.
BOARD VOTE:
__FNE__ __RWA__ __RTD___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Fred N. Eichorn___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002068810 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/11 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 129.0400 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084644C070212
This document confirms that when he was honorably REFRAD on 11 September 1984, he held the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6, and that he had satisfactorily served in that rank and pay grade for the entire 6 year and 2 month period of active duty service documented by this separation document. In this case, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 and satisfactorily served on active duty in that grade from 12 July 1978 to 11 September 1984. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010831
Having had prior active enlisted service from 2 August 1965 to 1 August 1968 and 13 January 1970 to 18 May 1974 (he was discharged as a specialist five (SP5)/E5), the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Massachusetts ARNG (MAARNG) on 8 March 1979 for 3 years in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5. Title 10, USC, section 3963 (Highest grade held satisfactorily: Reserve enlisted member reduced in grade not as a result of the member's misconduct) states a Reserve enlisted member of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016267
In arriving at the highest grade satisfactorily held, if the Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve on or after 25 February 1975, the retired grade will be that which an enlisted Soldier held while on active duty or in an active Reserve status for at least 185 days or 6 calendar months. The evidence of record shows the KSARNG issued orders promoting the applicant to SFC/E-7 on 4 June 1998. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard and the Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082908C070215
The applicant submitted an application to the Army Grade Determination Board (AGRDB) requesting advancement on the Retired list to the pay grade of E-7. This law authorizes Reserve enlisted members of the Army to be placed on the Retired List in the highest enlisted grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily. The laws and regulations in effect at that time provided for his placement on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade he held on the date of his REFRAD, and for his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058741C070421
The applicant’s military record shows that he was a member of the Army National Guard (ARNG) of Puerto Rico and that he served on active duty in an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) status from 4 August 1981 through 31 March 1999, at which time he was REFRAD for the purpose of retirement. Paragraph 12-3b(1) contains the general provisions of law governing retirement and it states in pertinent part, that ARNG soldiers serving on active duty at the time of their retirement, in a grade lower than...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011375
On 6 June 1996, the applicant requested active duty retirement with an effective date of 31 January 1997. Chapter 12 sets policies and procedures for voluntary retirement of Soldiers because of length of service and governs the retirement of Soldiers (Active Army, Army National Guard, and United States Army Reserve) who are retiring in their enlisted status. The applicant's retired pay is based on his retired grade of rank of SGT/E-5 as shown in Orders 161-2.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078787C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of this action, the commander listed several incidents of the applicant’s misconduct. As an exception, ARNG soldiers serving on active duty at the time of their retirement, in a grade lower than their highest enlisted active duty grade, who were administratively reduced not as a result of their own misconduct, will retire in the highest enlisted grade in which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083773C070212
The applicant’s military records show that he was released from active duty (REFRAD), for the purpose of voluntary early retirement under the provisions of chapter 12, Army Regulation 635-200, on 30 September 1997. By law and regulation, ARNG soldiers serving on active duty at the time of retirement, in a grade lower than their highest active duty enlisted grade, who were administratively reduced in grade not as a result of their own misconduct, will retire at the highest enlisted grade in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009028
The applicant provides "Member 1" copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that was issued at the time of his retirement on 31 October 1998; orders, dated 21 March 1988, which promoted him to SFC/E-7 effective 20 April 1988; orders, dated 5 June 1990, which reduced him from SFC/E-7 to SSG/E-6 effective 8 July 1990 in order to accept an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position in the Florida Army National Guard; a self-authored letter, dated 27 May 2008,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065521C070421
Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), prescribes the policy and procedures for granting retired pay benefits at age 60, for the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Paragraph 2-11 of this regulation covers computation of retired pay and paragraph 2-11c requires that each retirement applicant’s record will be screened to determine the highest grade held during his or her military service. Therefore, the Board recommends that the applicant's...