Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019663
Original file (20090019663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  27 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090019663 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct rank at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

2.  The applicant states his rank at the time of his separation from active duty on 7 July 2006 was sergeant (SGT)/E-5.  This was also his correct rank when he was discharged from the USAR on 19 November 2008; however, his orders show he was a specialist (SPC)/E-4.

	a.  He states he was promoted to SGT shortly after the attack on the World Trade Center and he served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) 1, 3, and 4.

	b.  He states he has frequently been the victim of mistreatment based on his race, ethnicity, and background.

	c.  He adds that a memorandum from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), dated 8 September 2008, advised him that a review of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) maintained in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) revealed that there are no Article 15's on file.  Consequently, there is no basis for the reduced rank shown on his discharge orders.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his resume, three memoranda, and his separation documents.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant had enlisted service in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) from 12 February 1986 through 11 February 1987; USAR from
12 February 1987 through 20 March 1988; NYARNG from 21 March 1988 through 7 November 2002; and the USAR from 8 November 2002 through
19 November 2008.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

2.  A DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of OIF on 27 July 2004.  He served in Kuwait from 7 to 18 September 2004 and in Iraq from 19 September 2004 to 10 May 2006.

	a.  He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 7 July 2006 based on completion of required active service and transferred to his USAR unit.

	b.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) shows the entry "SGT"; item 4b (Pay Grade) shows "E05"; and item 12 (Record of Service), block h (Effective Date of Pay Grade), shows "2001 10 01" (i.e., 1 October 2001).

3.  On 20 June 2008, the applicant submitted an application to this Board requesting removal of two Article 15's from his OMPF.

	a.  He provided a copy of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice]), initiated on 21 October 2007, as an enclosure to his application.  The block for his grade shows "SGT."

		(1)  He was charged with failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty; behaving with disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer; and willfully disobeying a lawful order from a noncommissioned officer.

		(2)  On 17 November 2007, having been afforded the opportunity to consult with counsel, he did not demand trial by court-martial, he requested a closed hearing, he requested a person to speak on his behalf, and he indicated matters in defense, mitigation, and/or extenuation would be presented in person.

		(3)  On 18 November 2007, all matters being considered, the punishment imposed included reduction to E4 and a $500.00 fine.


		(4)  The battalion commander directed the DA Form 2627 be filed in the performance section of the applicant's OMPF.
   
   (5)  The applicant indicated that he did not appeal the Article 15.

	b.  On 8 September 2008, the ABCMR notified the applicant that there were no DA Forms 2627 on file in his OMPF at the time.  The applicant's case was returned without prejudice and without action being taken by the Board.

4.  Headquarters, Civil Affairs and Psyop Command, Fort Bragg, NC, Orders
08-323-00010, dated 18 November 2008, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR effective 19 November 2008.  The Standard Name Line of the orders shows the applicant's rank as "SPC."

5.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, memorandum, dated 4 March 2010, notified the applicant of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (20-Year Letter).  This document shows the applicant's rank as "SPC."

6.  The applicant's Total Army Personnel Data Base (TAPDB) electronic record, accessible via the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Integrated Web Services (IWS) portal shows the applicant's rank as "SPC" and a date of rank of 8 December 2007.

7.  There is no evidence the applicant was promoted to SGT subsequent to
8 December 2007 and prior to the date he was discharged from the USAR on
19 November 2008.

8.  In support of his application, the applicant provides the following documents:

   a.  His resume in which he offers a summary of his citizenship, civilian employment, and military service.  He indicates he served in the rank of SGT.
   
   b.  Headquarters, 173rd Airborne Brigade, Kirkuk, Iraq, memorandum, dated 26 November 2003, subject:  Deployment Awards for OIF, that shows his rank at the time was SGT.
   
   c.  Headquarters, 411th Civil Affairs Battalion, Forward Operating Base Danger [Iraq], memorandum, dated 29 May 2005, subject:  Statement of Service, that shows his rank at the time was SGT.

   d.  Headquarters, 322nd Civil Affairs Brigade, Baghdad, Iraq, memorandum, dated 27 March 2006, subject:  Statement of Service, that shows his rank at the time was SGT.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the rank shown on his discharge orders should be corrected because there is no record of punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, to show he was reduced to SPC.

2.  Records show the applicant was promoted to SGT effective 1 October 2001.

3.  There was no record of a DA Form 2627 (Article 15) in the applicant's OMPF.  

   a.  On 20 June 2008, the applicant provided a copy of a DA Form 2627 to the ABCMR requesting its removal from his OMPF.

   b.  The document shows that the punishment imposed against the applicant by the commander was reduction from SGT to SPC and a $500.00 and that the DA Form 2627 would be filed in the performance section of his OMPF.

   c.  While the DA Form 2627 was not filed in the applicant's OMPF, there is no reason to conclude that the document is invalid.  In fact, the evidence of record supports this conclusion.  Thus, it is concluded that his reduction to SPC on
8 December 2007 was based on the punishment imposed under this Article 15.

4.  There is no evidence, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, to show that he was promoted to SGT subsequent to his reduction to SPC and prior to the date of his discharge from the USAR on 19 November 2008.

5.  The orders that discharged the applicant from the USAR on 19 November 2008 show his rank as SPC.  The applicant's 20-Year Letter and the TAPDB database also show his rank as SPC.

6.  Based on the foregoing and the available evidence, it is concluded that the applicant's rank is correct as shown on his discharge orders and in his military service records.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

7.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  __x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019663



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019663



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029890

    Original file (20100029890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100029890 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 18 November 2008, Headquarters, Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, Fort Bragg, NC, published Orders 08-323-00010 ordering his honorable discharge from the USAR in the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 effective 19 November 2008. Regardless, there is no evidence in his records, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, to show that he was promoted back to SGT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002005

    Original file (20070002005.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of Headquarters, Alpha Detachment, 22nd Personnel Services Battalion, Fort Lewis, Washington, Orders 290-060, dated 17 October 2006, that show the applicant was promoted from SPC to SGT, in MOS 15T2O, effective and with a date of rank of 1 October 2006. The applicant's military service records are absent any reduction document or instrument that would account for a change in rank from SGT to SPC during the period 1 October 2006 through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013061

    Original file (20100013061.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He provides: * two DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) * DA Form 3355-1-R (U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Promotion Point Worksheet) * DA Form 1610 (Request and Authorization for TDY [Temporary Duty] Travel of DOD [Department of Defense] Personnel) * DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave) * assignment orders, dated 11 July 2003 * DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) * three memoranda *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017478

    Original file (20090017478.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states he did just that and was told by the Troop D, 73rd Cavalry, unit 1SG that the unit would look into the matter. The applicant submitted the following in support of his request: a. DA Form 4430 (Department of the Army Report of Result of Trial); b. promotion orders for E-5, dated 20 May 2004, and promotion orders for E-6, dated 18 October 2007; c. DA Form 2627, dated 12 June 2006; d. orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Bronze Star Medal; e. PCS orders to Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002783

    Original file (20120002783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 5 (filing instructions) of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), regarding filing the Article 15 in the performance or the restricted section of his official military personnel file (OMPF) is lined through and replaced with the entry "N/A" (Not Applicable). NJP may be imposed to correct, educate, and reform offenders who the imposing commander determines cannot benefit from less stringent measures; to preserve a Soldier's record of service from unnecessary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003219

    Original file (20070003219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This Tab also includes medical documents completed on 9 and 10 August 2006; the DA Form 2627, dated 14 September 2006; a memorandum, dated 8 September 2006, a DA Form 31, dated 14 September 2006, authorizing convalescent leave from 15 September 2006 to 21 September 2006; a DA Form 4856 (Developmental Counseling Form), dated 25 July 2006, subject: Event Oriented Counseling, signed by the applicant and Major Teresa W_____ on 25 July 2006; 2 DA Forms 268 (Report To Suspend Favorable Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000345

    Original file (20150000345.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states, in effect: * the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) was altered and is not filed in his official military personnel file * Specialist T___ and his command misrepresented facts and forged documents * reduction orders are not filed in his OMPF * delays and oversights demonstrate error and injustice within the administrative process * he is entitled to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001576

    Original file (20090001576.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states that the applicantÂ’s punishment in this case was unjust given his well-documented medical condition. The Director further recommended the applicantÂ’s separation be reconsidered and that he be transferred to the WTU for further care; h. on 25 August 2008, the applicant submitted a request to be retained in the Army and have his three Article 15 punishments set aside (a copy of this request is not available for review with this case); i. on 27 August 2008, the separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004803

    Original file (20140004803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 May 2008 to show she completed her first term of service * discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), dated 23 November 2011, to show she was medically retired vice medically disqualified * records to show she was separated/discharged/retired in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice specialist (SPC)/E-4 2. The applicant provides: * her DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010499

    Original file (20080010499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 2627 [Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)], dated 28 July 2006, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). He was accordingly punished and his Article 15 was directed to be filed in the restricted portion of his OMPF.