Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002803
Original file (20080002803.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        9 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080002803 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in a modified application, that his records be corrected to show his retired rank and grade as Sergeant First Class (SFC), E-7, with all due retired pay.

2.  The applicant states that he should have been retired in the rank and grade of SFC, E-7.  He had previously been administratively reduced because no E-7 slots were available.

3.  The applicant provides an email from the Army Review Boards Agency legal section.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 January 1977.  He was promoted to SFC, E-7, on 14 December 1987.  He was honorably discharged on 29 April 1988 under the Fiscal Year 1988 Early Transition Program.

3.  On 27 January 1989, the applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard in the rank and grade of Staff Sergeant (SSG), E-6.

4.  On 18 July 1989, the applicant entered active duty in an Active Guard Reserve status.

5.  On 31 March 1998, the applicant was released from active duty in the rank and grade of SSG, E-6, after completing sufficient service for retirement under the provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, section 3914.  He was placed on the retired list in the rank and grade of SSG, E-6, on the following day.

6.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 3963(a), states a Reserve enlisted member of the Army described in subsection (b) who is retired under section 3914 of this Title shall be retired in the highest enlisted grade in which the member served on active duty satisfactorily (or, in the case of a member of the National Guard, in which the member served on full-time National Guard duty satisfactorily), as determined by the Secretary of the Army.  Subsection 3963(b) states this section applies to a Reserve enlisted member who (1) at the time of retirement is serving on active duty (or, in the case of a member of the National Guard, on full-time National Guard duty) in a grade lower than the highest enlisted grade held by the member while on active duty (or full-time National Guard duty); and (b) was previously administratively reduced in grade not as a result of the member’s own misconduct, as determined by the Secretary of the Army.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant had been promoted to SFC, E-7, on 14 December 1987, while he was in the Regular Army.  He was an SFC, E-7, when he was discharged from the Regular Army on 29 April 1988.

2.  The applicant was administratively reduced to the rank and grade of SSG,    E-6, when he enlisted in the Army National Guard on 27 January 1989.  He was placed on the retired list as an SSG, E-6, on 1 April 1998 after he retired from active duty under the provisions of Title 10, section 3914.

3.  Since the evidence of record shows that the applicant was administratively reduced to SSG, E-6, not as a result of his own misconduct, it appears that he 

met the criteria outlined in Title 10, U. S. Code, section 3963(a) to have been placed on the retired list in the rank and grade of SFC, E-7, on 1 April 1998.  His records should be corrected to reflect this.

BOARD VOTE:

___xx___  ___xx___  ____xx__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.  showing he was placed on the retired list on 1 April 1998 in the rank and grade of Sergeant First Class, E-7; and

     b.  paying to him all retired pay due as a result of the above correction.




      _______ xxxx_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002803





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002803



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010831

    Original file (20110010831.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Having had prior active enlisted service from 2 August 1965 to 1 August 1968 and 13 January 1970 to 18 May 1974 (he was discharged as a specialist five (SP5)/E5), the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Massachusetts ARNG (MAARNG) on 8 March 1979 for 3 years in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5. Title 10, USC, section 3963 (Highest grade held satisfactorily: Reserve enlisted member reduced in grade not as a result of the member's misconduct) states a Reserve enlisted member of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000943C070205

    Original file (20060000943C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel stated the applicant was retired under Title 10, U. S. Code, section 3914 after completing over 20 years of active duty. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 12-3b(1) states that retirement normally will be in the regular or reserve grade the Soldier holds on the date of retirement. Subsection 3963(b) states this section applies to a Reserve enlisted member who (1) at the time of retirement is serving on active duty (or, in the case...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006244

    Original file (20120006244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. He recently received correspondence from the recorder of the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) informing him that it appears he should have been placed on the Retired List in the grade of E-7 and he should apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for review of his case. 10 USC, section 3964 (Higher grade after 30 years of service: warrant officers and enlisted members), provides that each retired member of the Army covered by subsection (b) who is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016267

    Original file (20110016267.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In arriving at the highest grade satisfactorily held, if the Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve on or after 25 February 1975, the retired grade will be that which an enlisted Soldier held while on active duty or in an active Reserve status for at least 185 days or 6 calendar months. The evidence of record shows the KSARNG issued orders promoting the applicant to SFC/E-7 on 4 June 1998. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard and the Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011335

    Original file (20140011335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Retired Orders Number C-05-494313 and amendment * DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service-for Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes) * Marriage certificate * Enlisted Record Brief * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 31 January 1999, 31 October 1994, 12 September 1990, and 30 March 1993 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * Orders 02-182-00032, reduction to SFC/E-7 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007397

    Original file (20080007397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), in effect at the time, chapter 4, provided guidance regarding the promotion of Soldiers serving in an AGR status. The fact that an error was made on the U. S. Total Army Personnel Command, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, memorandum, dated 21 January 1992, citing the authority for his removal from the 1991 SFC Promotion List as Army Regulation 140-158, paragraph 4-19f(4), instead of paragraph...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009028

    Original file (20080009028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides "Member – 1" copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that was issued at the time of his retirement on 31 October 1998; orders, dated 21 March 1988, which promoted him to SFC/E-7 effective 20 April 1988; orders, dated 5 June 1990, which reduced him from SFC/E-7 to SSG/E-6 effective 8 July 1990 in order to accept an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position in the Florida Army National Guard; a self-authored letter, dated 27 May 2008,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025066

    Original file (20110025066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 June 1995 * promotion orders to SFC/E-7 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SFC/E-7 on 1 October 1992 and she served in this rank until 30 June 1995. Since there is no evidence of record which shows her service in the rank of SFC was not satisfactory, and in accordance with the governing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017731

    Original file (20090017731.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant contends that the FSM's pay grade in both the DEERS and DFAS databases is incorrect and should be corrected to show he retired in pay grade E-7 so that she may receive her Army benefits and correct SBP annuity. The DFAS database shows the FSM retired in pay grade E-7 on 3 September 1994, the date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019129

    Original file (20090019129.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * self-authored statement * promotion orders to E-7 * request for administrative reduction * reduction orders to E-6 * three orders for Full-Time National Guard Duty (FTNGD) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 August 2007 * Army National Guard Retirement Points History Statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He previously held the grade of E-7 from 24...