Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001766
Original file (20120001766.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  7 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001766 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the rank on his discharge orders be corrected.  

2.  The applicant states he served successfully for 8 years and his rank was incorrectly listed as specialist/E-4 on his discharge orders.  He claims this error was probably the result of his not reenlisting at the time.  

3.  The applicant provides discharge orders, a leave and earnings statement (LES) for 29 June 1988, and a military identification card (ID) in support of his request. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant's record on the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) contains a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Documents Armed Forces of the United States) that documents the applicant's 29 June 1988 enlistment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  It lists his pay grade as E-4.  It also contains a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 24 May 1994 which also lists his rank and grade as SPC/E-4.  There are no other documents filed in this record.  

3.  The Total Army Personnel Data Base (TAPDB) cover sheet for the applicant lists his grade as SPC/E-4 and his date of rank (DOR) as 3 February 1991.  An ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 
27 February 2012, for the applicant lists his grade as SPC/E-4.  There are no other documents for the applicant filed in iPERMS.

4.  The applicant provides Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) Orders 96-262-062, dated 18 September 1996, which directed the applicant's honorable discharge from the USAR.  These orders list his rank as SPC in the standard name line (SNL).  

5.  He also provides an LES, dated 29 June 1988 that lists his pay grade as E-5 and the front side of a military ID card that also lists his rank/grade as sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5).  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to correct the rank/grade on his discharge orders has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.  

2.  Although the applicant provides an LES dated in 1988 and the front side of an ID card that is undated that list his rank/grade as SGT/E-5, all the available documents on iPERMS for the applicant list his rank/grade as SPC/E-4, and his DOR as 3 February 1991.  As a result, absent any evidence of record to corroborate the applicant's claim or that confirm he held the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 on the date of his discharge from the USAR, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief. 



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ___X_____  __X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _X   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001766



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001766



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015368

    Original file (20140015368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a new issue, he requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 for his Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Advanced Camp service in 1988 and that this DD Form 214 show his pay grade as E-5. Regarding the correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991 to show his pay grade as E-5, the evidence of record, as well as that provided by the applicant, does not support the granting of this request. c. As further evidence he no longer held the pay grade of E-5 after disenrollment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002827

    Original file (20130002827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 to show his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and his date of rank (DOR) as 9 July 1979. However, Orders Number 079-01, issued by the CAARNG, on 19 March 2000 show he was reduced from SGT to SPC with a DOR of 9 July 1979 due to inefficiency in accordance with National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), paragraph 11-60. The applicant indicated he was reduced from the rank of SGT to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010040

    Original file (20110010040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending on 1 August 1988 * Understanding of Appointment as a Commissioned Officer, dated 2 November 1994 * Promotion orders for 1LT, dated 9 November 1994 * Reenlistment Eligibility Data Display (REDD) Report, dated 6 November 2007 * Appeal of Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) memorandum, dated 16 October 2009 * DA Form 7562 (Physical Disability Evaluation System) Commander’s Performance and Functional Statement,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009965

    Original file (20070009965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5, effective 18 May 1981, and served in that grade for over 5 years. A review of the applicant's military service record and Summary of Retirement Points shows that he did not serve in the grade of E-5 satisfactorily because of his reduction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004051

    Original file (20120004051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Beyond his service in the RA where he was honorably REFRAD after completing over 4 years of active service to attend school, there is no indication he performed any further period of active service of 90 continuous days or more that would have resulted in the issuance of a subsequent DD Form 214. His record further shows that as a USAR Soldier, he was ordered to active duty to attend AT for a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019663

    Original file (20090019663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct rank at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). There is no evidence, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, to show that he was promoted to SGT subsequent to his reduction to SPC and prior to the date of his discharge from the USAR on 19 November 2008. Based on the foregoing and the available evidence, it is concluded that the applicant's rank is correct as shown on his discharge orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018300

    Original file (20130018300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. His Statement of Service (date of preparation illegible) shows his pay grade was E-4 on 1 February 1990. It states for items 4a and 4b, enter the active duty grade of rank and pay grade at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027965

    Original file (20100027965.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his rank and pay grade on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 14 November 2008 be corrected to show sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5. This regulation states that the Soldier's active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation would be entered in item 4a and item 4b of the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003939

    Original file (20140003939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) by: a. revoking the DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 24 February 2012, which erroneously advanced him from the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 to the rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 and removing it from his AMHRR; b. amending the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code for Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 4 April 2012, to show he held the rank/grade of private first class...