Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010040
Original file (20110010040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	17 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110010040 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, placement on the Retired List in the rank of first lieutenant (1LT), pay grade 0-2.  

2.  He states the highest rank he held was that of 1LT.

3.  He provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending on 1 August 1988
* Understanding of Appointment as a Commissioned Officer, dated 2 November 1994
* Promotion orders for 1LT, dated 9 November 1994
* Reenlistment Eligibility Data Display (REDD) Report, dated
6 November 2007
* Appeal of Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) memorandum, dated 16 October 2009
* DA Form 7562 (Physical Disability Evaluation System) Commander’s Performance and Functional Statement, dated 16 October 2009
* Medical Clearance from Case Management and Warrior in Transition Status memorandum, dated 17 December 2009





CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military record shows he enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program on 9 May 1986.  He enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 17 July 1986. He was promoted to pay grade E-3 on 1 October 1987.  

2.  He was honorably released from active duty in pay grade E-3 on 1 August 1988 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC)).  He was issued a DD Form 214 crediting him with 2 years and 15 days of net active service.  Item 25 (Narrative Reason for Separation) shows the entry "To Enter ROTC."

3.  He provided a copy of an Understanding of Appointment as a Commissioned Officer in the USAR with concurrent call to active duty which he signed and dated on 2 November 1994.

4.  He further provided a copy of orders, dated 9 November 1994, promoting him to the rank of 1LT, Infantry, with a date of rank (DOR) and effective date of 1 December 1994.

5.  He also provided a copy of a REDD Report, dated 6 November 2007, in which it was reported that he began service in the USAR on 2 November 1994 and was separated on 28 February 1995 in the rank of 1LT.

6.  A review of his official military personnel file located on the Integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (IPERMS) and Army Human Resources Command, Soldier Management System, failed to reveal an Oath of Office and USAR Appointment Memorandum.  There is also no evidence he was promoted to 1LT and separated from active duty and the USAR in the rank of 1LT during his periods of military service.

7.  He enlisted in the South Carolina Army National Guard (SCARNG), in pay grade E-3, on 19 December 2007.  In Section VI (Remarks) of his DD Form 1966-4 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States), he listed that he had served in the RA from July 1986 to August 1988 in an enlisted status.

8.  He was promoted to the rank of specialist (SPC), pay grade E-4, on 26 November 2008.  He was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and entered active duty on 13 December 2008.

9.  A memorandum, dated 16 October 2009, shows the applicant appealed MEB results pointing out the following inaccuracies.  The Narrative Summary incorrectly listed him as having 2 years of Army active duty service from 1986 to 1988, a break in service, and then joining the SCARNG in December 2007.  In fact he received an ROTC commission as a 1LT in 1994 and was discharged from the Army, after attaining the rank of 1LT, on 28 February 1995.

10.  On 2 November 2009, an informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) convened and considered the applicant's disabilities of generalized anxiety disorder and chronic neck and low back pain.  The PEB found the applicant's physical impairment prevented reasonable performance of duties required by grade and MOS.  The PEB recommended the applicant's placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) because his condition was not sufficiently stable for final adjudication.

11.  On 5 November 2009, the applicant concurred with the PEB and waived his right to a formal hearing.  The findings and recommendation of the PEB were approved on the same date.

12.  On 20 January 2010, he was honorably retired under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24b(2), due to a disability, temporary and placed on    the TDRL in the rank of SPC/pay grade E-4.  He was credited with completing     1 year, 1 month, and 8 days of net active service this period and 2 years,            4 months, and 24 days of prior active service.  He was also honorably separated from the SCARNG in the rank of SPC, pay grade E-4 on the same date.  

13.  His Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 7 November 2011, shows he served in an enlisted USAR status from 18 July 1988 through 17 July 1995.   

14.  On 28 July 2011, the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) 
returned his petition without action because the Board did not have jurisdiction under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3964.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the RA on 17 July 1986.  He was honorably released from active duty in pay grade E-3 on 1 August 1988.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was transferred to the USAR to enter ROTC.  

2.  He provided documentation that shows he was commissioned in the USAR with concurrent call to active duty on 2 November 1994.  He also provided a copy of orders promoting him to the rank of 1LT with a DOR and effective date of
1 December 1994.  He stated in his appeal to the MEB that he was discharged from the Army on 28 February 1995 in the rank of 1LT.

3.  The documentation he provided was carefully considered; however, there is no evidence of record confirming he was appointed in the USAR as a 2LT, entered on active duty, and was promoted to 1LT in 1994.  At the time of his enlistment in the SCARNG on 19 December 2007, he only listed on his DD Form 1966/4 his enlisted service in the RA from 7 July 1986 to August 1988.

4.  The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the SCARNG in pay grade E-3 on 19 December 2007.  He was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 26 November 2008.  He entered on active duty on 13 December 2008.  On 20 January 2010, he was honorably retired in pay grade E-4 due to a temporary disability.

5.  There is also no evidence and he provided insufficient evidence to show he served satisfactorily and had sufficient time in the rank of 1LT for advancement on the retired list in that grade.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  __x______  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010040



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010040



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015411

    Original file (20100015411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documentary evidence: * self-authored promotion date comparison sheet, dated 21 May 2010 * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records), dated 9 June 1988 * DA Form 268 (Report for Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions), dated 17 February 1988 * memorandum, dated 5 February 1988, subject: Involuntary Separation Action * memorandum for record, dated 10 June 1988, concerning an appeal of his Officer Evaluation Report (OER) * Orders 6-3,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103180C070208

    Original file (2004103180C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Laverne V. Berry | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that the date of rank (DOR) of his appointment to second lieutenant (2LT) be adjusted from 26 May 1982 to 8 May 1982. The applicant provides in support of his application a copy of his Reserve commissioned officer Oath of Office dated 8 May 1982; a copy of his memorandum appointing him as a Reserve commissioned officer of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017487

    Original file (20080017487.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states the record shows the applicant was considered and selected for promotion to CPT by the 1997 RCSB and was given a date of rank of 3 October 1998 as a TPU officer. Therefore, as recommended by HRC promotion officials, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to refer the applicant's record to an SSB for consideration for promotion to CPT under the criteria of the 1994 (if otherwise eligible, given his 1 November 1994 REFRAD date) and 1995 promotion boards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012513

    Original file (20090012513.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A copy of his November 2006 LES that shows his grade as a cadet/E-5, his pay date as 22 May 2003, and his years of service as 3. c. A copy of his DA Form 1506 that shows his active and inactive USAR service as well as his active duty service. The evidence of record shows that the applicant initially enlisted in the USAR on 2 November 2001 and was discharged on 6 August 2002. The applicant subsequently executed an Army Senior ROTC non-scholarship cadet contract on 1 August 2004, to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008877

    Original file (20140008877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During his initial enlistment he was commissioned as a reserve officer in May 1986 and later entered on active duty in June 1987 without a break in service. For advancement to a commissioned officer grade, the Soldier must have served satisfactorily on active duty in this grade for not less than 6 months. Warrant officers and enlisted members of the Army are entitled, when their active service plus their service on the retired list totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021420

    Original file (20120021420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The grade or rank in which he is serving on the date when his name is placed on the temporary disability retired list or, if his name was not carried on that list, on the date when he is retired. As required by law, the servicing military personnel office promoted him to SSG/E-6 on the date of retirement and placed him on the Retired list in the higher grade SSG/E-6. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011801

    Original file (20080011801.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) during the period of 3 November 2002 through 3 January 2007, that he was granted retirement points for that period, and that he was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant (1LT) on 24 January 2003. He also states that he has again been appointed in the MNARNG in the rank of 2LT on 3 January 2007 and desires his date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007116

    Original file (20140007116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, they recently issued a corrected appointment memorandum awarding him 7 years, 4 months, and 1 day time in grade (TIG) upon his appointment as a chaplain 1LT. e. besides the error with the applicant's appointment rank, the applicant was wrongly not considered for promotion to CPT, MAJ, and LTC at the appropriate times and with the appropriate year groups. d. If before the SSB process is completed he is removed from the Reserve active status list: (1) Correct his records by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021470

    Original file (20100021470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), and 4b (Pay Grade) be corrected to show he retired in the highest grade held. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (Grade on retirement of members of the Armed Forces for physical disability) states unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an armed force who is retired for physical disability under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009965

    Original file (20070009965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5, effective 18 May 1981, and served in that grade for over 5 years. A review of the applicant's military service record and Summary of Retirement Points shows that he did not serve in the grade of E-5 satisfactorily because of his reduction...