Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018300
Original file (20130018300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  22 July 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130018300 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  the DD Form 214 he received after his service during Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm is the only DD Form 214 he has for his military service and it only shows the E-4 pay grade he got after rejoining the Reserves during the Gulf War.  It does not show pay grade E-5 he earned during his Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP) and duty resulting from completing Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) advanced camp at Fort Lewis, WA, in 1988, where he returned to his unit as an SMP cadet and he achieved the pay grade of E-5.  

	b.  he has attached Leave and Earnings Statements (LES) from both periods that reflect his pay grade of E-5.

	c.  as a member of the 263rd Supply and Service (S&S) Company in El Paso, TX, he was a cadet E-5 until entering the control group in which he later came out and accepted a lower grade with the 340th S&S Company.  He served during the Gulf War as a sergeant/E-5.  



3.  The applicant provides:

* LESs
* DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 March 1987 in pay grade E-3/private first class.

3.  His records contain a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 13 February 1990, which shows he was advanced to SPC/E-4 effective 1 February 1990.

4.  He was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm on 27 September 1990.  He served in Southwest Asia from 30 October 1990 to 21 April 1991.  On 19 May 1991, he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of SPC/E-4.

5.  Item 4a of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991 shows the entry "SPC."  Item 4b shows the entry "E4."

6.  There are no promotion orders in the available records which show he was promoted to SGT/E-5 prior to his REFRAD.

7.  His Statement of Service (date of preparation illegible) shows his pay grade was E-4 on 1 February 1990.  It does not show he was promote to SGT/E-5.

8.  His discharge orders show he was honorably discharged from the USAR on 28 March 1995 in the rank of SPC. 


9.  In support of his claim, he provides LESs which show his pay grade as E-5 for the following periods: 

* 1-30 November 1987
* 1-30 November 1990
* 1-19 May 1991

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states for items 4a and 4b, enter the active duty grade of rank and pay grade at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he earned pay grade E-5 in 1988.  However, the evidence of record shows he held the rank/pay grade of SPC/E-4 at the time of his REFRAD on 19 May 1991.  

2.  There is no evidence of record that shows he was promoted to SGT/E-5 prior to his REFRAD on 19 May 1991.  His USAR discharge orders show he was honorably discharged in 1995 in the rank of SPC/E-4. 

3.  In the absence of orders promoting him to SGT/E-5, the LESs provided by the applicant (which are contradicted by the Statement of Service) are not sufficient as a basis for amending items 4a and 4b of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991.  It appears he may have been an E-5 only when participating in the SMP with the 263rd S&S Company and reverted to his non-SMP rank and grade upon his deployment with the 340th S&S Company.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ____X____  __X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______X__________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018300





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018300



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015368

    Original file (20140015368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a new issue, he requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 for his Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Advanced Camp service in 1988 and that this DD Form 214 show his pay grade as E-5. Regarding the correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1991 to show his pay grade as E-5, the evidence of record, as well as that provided by the applicant, does not support the granting of this request. c. As further evidence he no longer held the pay grade of E-5 after disenrollment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004225

    Original file (20090004225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 14 August 1990 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his proper rank and pay grade and to add earned awards. Chapter 2 contains DD Form 214 preparation instructions and the instructions in effect at the time of the applicant's separation stated that the PQR and all documents on file in the OMPF would be used as the source for DD Form 214 entries. Notwithstanding the pencil entry in item 18 of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007904

    Original file (20090007904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was originally enlisted in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) in the rank of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 during high school, that he enrolled in the Senior ROTC in the Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP) with the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), that he transferred to the Indiana Army National Guard, and that he completed the Senior ROTC Advanced Camp in the summer of 1990. There are no orders for the ARCAM in the available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000546

    Original file (20100000546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no documents in the available records that show the applicant was promoted to the rank of SPC/E-4. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to PFC/E-3 in September 1990.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011193

    Original file (20140011193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served in the rank and pay grade of SPC/ E-4 and he was awarded the AAM; however, they were not recorded on his DD Form 214 when he separated from active duty. In review, the applicant’s records do not have evidence of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and his first term of enlisted service was honorable. Accordingly, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period of 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017163C070206

    Original file (20050017163C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) on his DD Form 214 shows his rank as “SPC” and item 4b (Pay Grade) shows his pay grade as “E4.” His date of rank is shown as 19 January 1993. There is no evidence of record which shows he was reduced to SPC, E-4 prior to his release from active duty on 29 March 2005. However, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 March 2005 shows he was released from active duty in the rank of SPC, E-4 with a date of rank of 19 January 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003309

    Original file (20150003309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 July 1992, VAARNG published Orders 146-57 discharging him from the ARNG and assigning him to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) effective 31 July 1992 by reason of being an unsatisfactory participant, in accordance with chapter 8 of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management). This regulation states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when he or she accrues nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills during a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020155

    Original file (20090020155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his rank at the time of his separation from active duty on 2 March 1992 was specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4. The applicant contends that the rank of PFC (E-3) and RE Code of "RE-3C" shown on his DD Form 214 should be corrected because he held the rank of SPC (E-4) at the time of his voluntary separation under the 1990 Early Transition Program and he should not be penalized with the RE code that he was issued. There is no evidence that the applicant was reduced in rank...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017300

    Original file (20090017300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 13 May 1991 to show the rank of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant was properly released from active duty on 13 May 1991 in the rank and grade of SPC/E-4. On 13 May 1991, she was released from active duty and issued a DD Form 214 showing her rank and pay grade as SPC/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002005

    Original file (20070002005.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of Headquarters, Alpha Detachment, 22nd Personnel Services Battalion, Fort Lewis, Washington, Orders 290-060, dated 17 October 2006, that show the applicant was promoted from SPC to SGT, in MOS 15T2O, effective and with a date of rank of 1 October 2006. The applicant's military service records are absent any reduction document or instrument that would account for a change in rank from SGT to SPC during the period 1 October 2006 through...