Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023280
Original file (20110023280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  5 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023280 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal from participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states:

* he doesn't want SBP coverage
* he was drugged up and had a noncommissioned officer (NCO) telling him to sign "stuff"
* his wife was giving birth to his children and he did not know what was going on

3.  The applicant provides:

* Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) letter, dated 23 September 2011
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel)
* Congressional response, dated 27 September 2011
* November 2011 SBP/Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) premium bill

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After having prior service in the U.S. Marine Corps and Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 March 2008.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 14T (Patriot Launching Station Enhanced Operator/Maintainer).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was sergeant/E-5.

2.  On 18 February 2011, the applicant was honorably retired by reason of temporary disability.  On 19 February 2011, the applicant's name was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List.  He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 18 days of active service and had 4 years, 3 months, and 24 days of prior active service.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 2656 shows:

	a.  Item 25 (Dependent Children) lists the date of birth for his children as 20 December 2008 and 27 January 2011.

	b.  Section IX (SBP Election), item 25 (Beneficiary Category(ies)) is marked "b.  I elect coverage for spouse and child(ren)."

	c.  Section IX, item 27 (Level of Coverage) is marked "a.  I elect coverage based on full gross pay."

	d.  Section XI (Certification), item 30 (Member), states, in part, "Also, I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within 1 year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay.  However, if I exercise my option to terminate the SBP, future participation is barred."

	e.  The applicant acknowledged these elections by affixing his signature in section XI and his signature was witnessed by the SBP counselor.  Both signatures are dated 9 February 2011.

4.  The applicant provides an SBP/RSFPP premium bill for November 2011 which shows:

* he owed $670.75 for the previous month (October 2011)
* he had a 6-percent interest charge of $3.27 for his remaining balance
* his current monthly charge was $89.65
* his total cost owed to DFAS for November 2011 was $763.67 and was due by 28 November 2011

5.  The applicant also provides a copy of a letter from DFAS to his State Congressional representative, dated 23 November 2011, regarding his SBP election.  DFAS advised the representative that the applicant was not eligible to terminate his SBP coverage at the time and may request to discontinue his SBP participation beginning the 25th month (March 2013) of his retirement or petition the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.  His representative relayed the message from DFAS to the applicant in a letter, dated 27 September 2011.

6.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a 1-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse's concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to discontinue participation in the SBP was carefully considered.

2.  While the applicant states an NCO was telling him to sign "stuff," his wife was giving birth to their children, and he did not know what was going on, he has not submitted sufficient evidence to support his contentions.

3.  His DD Form 2656 shows he acknowledged he had been counseled on termination of his SBP participation.  Both his signature and the SBP counselor's signature show the form was signed well after the birth of his children.

4.  The applicant has not exhausted his other administrative remedy to correct the alleged error by waiting until the 25th month (March 2013) of his retirement to cancel his participation in the SBP with his spouse's written concurrence.  Further, the applicant failed to provide his wife's concurrence to cancel his participation in the SBP.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023280



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023280



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011348

    Original file (20110011348 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant elected spouse and children SBP coverage at a reduced base amount at the time of his retirement from military service. SBP premiums are deducted from a member’s retired pay. Therefore, based on the lack of SBP counseling received at the time of retirement, the applicant's record should be corrected in the interest of equity and justice, to show he declined participation, with his wife's concurrence, in the SBP which would also result in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000267

    Original file (20120000267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    State of Delaware, Marriage License and Certificate of Marriage, that shows the applicant and Dannette Michelle B---- were married on 20 October 2001; b. DD Form 2656-2 (SBP Termination Request) that shows: * the applicant requested to discontinue participation in the SBP * his spouse acknowledged her understanding of the disadvantages of the decision and provided her concurrence * the applicant, his spouse, and a witness signed the form on 29 December 2011 c. notarized statement by Dannette...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003410

    Original file (20130003410.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The available evidence shows that, approximately 4 months after the effective date of his placement on the TDRL, the applicant attempted to elect not to participate in the SBP. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show he made a timely election not to participate in the SBP prior to his retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008928

    Original file (20070008928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 October 2007, DFAS informed this agency by email that the applicant used the wrong DD Form 2656 and signed it on 15 April 2007 after having been placed on the TDRL. The applicant alleges that she does not remember electing SBP; however, the evidence shows that she completed an SBP Election Certificate, DD Form 2656-5 (the incorrect form for a member being medically retired), on 15 April 2005, after placement on the TDRL. The applicant reviewed her Retiree Account Statement (SBP/RSFPP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013449

    Original file (20120013449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant, L.M.J., the widow and second wife of a deceased retired former service member (FSM), requests reimbursement of Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums that were paid and any necessary corrections that are required to the FSM's records. The response stated: a. the FSM elected to participate in the SBP on 1 October 1973 and elected spouse and child coverage; b. SBP premiums were deducted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007142

    Original file (20130007142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 February 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130007142 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 31 January 2011, the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) reviewed the applicant's record and recommended that he be permanently retired with a total combined disability rating of 40 percent. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provided less than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002751

    Original file (20150002751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was medically retired from the Army on 26 December 2013. The portion of a VA rating decision he provided that increased his PTSD rating to 100% specifically stated the medical evidence showed he was competent to manage his financial affairs.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000971

    Original file (20110000971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he received his first Retiree Account Statement (RAS) it showed he was enrolled in the SBP for full spouse coverage and that he had incurred a debt in excess of $3,000 for retroactive SBP premiums. Both the applicant's OMPF and ACTS are void of the DoD PDBR Record of Proceedings or any evidence showing corrective action was taken in the form of providing him: * TDRL orders * a revised DD Form 214 * Permanent disability retirement orders * a DD Form 2656 or any other form of SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018920

    Original file (20100018920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of the DD Form 2656 instructs the applicant that "SBP spouse concurrence is required when a member is married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement on 31 May 2010, the applicant and his wife elected to decline participation in the SBP with a notarized DD Form 2656, dated 30 March 2010. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018353

    Original file (20140018353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section XI (Certification) item 30 (Member) states, "Also, I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within 1-year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. He provided a DD Form 2656-2 requesting termination of his SBP coverage. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein he elected to participate in the SBP for spouse/children based on the full amount in the presence of an RSO counselor.