Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000971
Original file (20110000971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110000971 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).  He also request reimbursement of all premiums that have been collected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recently decided to grant him a permanent disability retirement with a combined disability rating of 50%.  He contends that he was not initially provided a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) or afforded an opportunity to make an SBP election.  He was unaware of the fact that he was enrolled in SBP until he began receiving SBP/Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) Premium Bills/ statements from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).

3.  When he received his first Retiree Account Statement (RAS) it showed he was enrolled in the SBP for full spouse coverage and that he had incurred a debt in excess of $3,000 for retroactive SBP premiums.  As soon as this error was brought to his attention he contacted DFAS for an explanation.  Then he and his spouse completed a DD Form 2656 wherein they elected not to participate in the SBP.  This form was signed by him and his spouse and the form was notarized.  He concludes that they did as they were instructed.  He should not be penalized for what appears to be an error committed by DFAS. 




4.  The applicant provides:

* A self-authored statement
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Approval letter from the DoD PDBR
* Two SBP/RSFPP Premium Bills
* RAS
* DD Form 2656

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 September 1997 and held military occupational specialty 13B (Cannon Crewmember).  On 29 July 2004 he was honorably discharged due to disability with entitlement to severance pay based upon a 10% disability rating.  At the time of discharge he held the rank/grade of corporal/E-4.  In view of the fact that he was not retiring at the time, he was not afforded pre-separation counseling on the SBP.  His records show he married his spouse, J____y, on
23 May 2000.

2.  The Army Review Board Agency Case Tracking System (ACTS) contains a Record of Proceedings which shows he submitted an application to the DoD PDBR on 26 February 2010 requesting reevaluation of his medical condition at the time of discharge. 

3.  On 20 August 2010, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (DASA) Review Boards informed the Commander of the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) that the applicant's DoD PDBR request was approved.  As a result, it was directed that the applicant was to be constructively placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) for 6 months with a 50% disability rating, effective the date of his original medical separation for disability with severance pay, following this 6 month period his separation action would be recharacterized to a permanent disability retirement with a combined disability rating of 50%.  The DASA directed that all Department of the Army records of the applicant be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum (17 December 2010) by:

	a.  Providing a correction to the applicant's separation document (DD Form 214) showing that he was separated by reason of temporary disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.


	b.  Providing orders showing the applicant was retired with a permanent disability effective the day following the 6 month TDRL period.

	c.  Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly.  Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, provide 50% retired pay for the constructive temporary disability retired 6 month period effective the date of the applicant's original medical separation and then payment of permanent disability retired pay at 50% effective the day following the 6 month TDRL period.

	d.  Affording the individual the opportunity to elect SBP and medical TRICARE retiree options.

4.  On 20 August 2010, the DASA (Review Boards) informed the applicant of the aforementioned approval of his request, the corrections that would be made to his service records, and that the DoD PDBR had been forwarded to the USAPDA and DFAS for implementation.  He was also informed that these agencies would provide him an official notification by mail as soon as the above corrections were made and he would be provided information on his retirement benefits.  He was also advised that due to the large number of cases in process, it could be several months before he received notification that the corrections were completed and his pay had been adjusted.

5.  The applicant provides two SBP/RSFF Premium Bills (for November and December 2010) and an RAS (for December 2010) which show DFAS enrolled him in the SBP retroactive to 6 months following his discharge (+/- February 2005) and imposed a debt for SBP premiums for the period of February 2005 to October 2010 in the amount of $3,016.48.

	a.  In November 2010, his debt increased to $3,060.00 based on the addition of a monthly premium charge of $43.52.

	b.  In December 2010, his debt increased to $3,118.42 based on the addition of a monthly premium charge of $43.52 and an interest charge of $14.60.

6.  The applicant provides a DD Form 2656 which shows he and his spouse elected not to participate in the SBP on 3 January 2011.  This form bears the names and signatures of the applicant, his spouse, and a notary public. 

7.  On 28 April 2011, a representative of DFAS confirmed they had no record of receiving an SBP election form from the applicant.



8.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and ACTS are void of:

* the DoD PDBR Record of Proceedings
* TDRL orders
* a revised DD Form 214
* Permanent disability retirement orders
* a DD Form 2656 or any other form of SBP election

9.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  The election must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to spouse coverage, if applicable.

10.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

11.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a 1-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he elected not to participate in the SBP and he should be reimbursed any premiums he has paid.

2.  On 20 August 2010, the DASA (Review Boards) informed the Commander of the USAPDA that the applicant's DoD PDBR request was approved and directed that corrective action be taken accordingly no later than 17 December 2010.  

3.  Both the applicant's OMPF and ACTS are void of the DoD PDBR Record of Proceedings or any evidence showing corrective action was taken in the form of providing him: 

* TDRL orders
* a revised DD Form 214
* Permanent disability retirement orders
* a DD Form 2656 or any other form of SBP election

4.  The available evidence indicates DFAS acted immediately to place the applicant into a retired status and in the absence of an SBP election being made prior to the effective date of retirement SBP coverage automatically defaulted to full spouse coverage retroactive to 6 months following his original discharge date. DFAS then billed the applicant for nearly 6 years of SBP premiums.  When in fact, had he died any time prior to approval of the DoD PDBR Record of Proceedings, his spouse would not have been entitled to SBP because he was not retired.

5.  The evidence of record shows that shortly after discovery of this discrepancy, the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein he and his spouse elected, in the presence of a notary public, not to participate in the SBP. 

6.  In the interest of equity, the applicant's records should be corrected by:

* showing he elected not to participate in the SBP in a timely manner
* remitting and cancelling his SBP premium debt
* reimbursing any premiums already paid by the applicant

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form 2656 electing not to participate in the SBP and that his spouse concurred with his decision, on 28 July 2004, one day prior to the retroactive effective date of his disability retirement;

	b.  showing the DFAS timely received and processed the applicant's DD Form 2656 with the spouse's concurrence; and

	c.  reimbursing the applicant all premiums he has already paid as a result of the above corrections.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000971



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000971



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019951

    Original file (20130019951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged on 16 December 2005 by reason of physical disability with severance pay. He signed the first DD Form 2656 on 18 June 2013 and elected to participate in the SBP for spouse only coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his DD Form 2656 to show he and his spouse signed the form in a timely manner declining to participate in the SBP and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010019

    Original file (20130010019.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided a letter issued by DFAS on 31 March 2010, which indicated they had received the DASA’s directive and informed him that service members who retroactively become entitled to retired pay on a date after 20 September 1972 are automatically given full SBP coverage, unless the member elects to reduce the coverage or declines participation before the correction action (date of entitlement). The evidence of record shows the applicant was retroactively retired on 9 December 2009 with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008601

    Original file (20110008601.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 8 December 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110008601 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, in the interest of fairness and as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show that the applicant elected not to participate in the SBP in a timely manner, that his spouse concurred with the election, and that he is entitled to a refund of any premiums deducted from his retired pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007817

    Original file (20140007817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was advised that the SBP premiums would be deducted from his Military Disability Retired Pay every month. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show his participation in the SBP was terminated effective 23 September 2013. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to by: a. showing his DD Form 2656-2 was received and processed on 23 September 2013; b. terminating his participation in the SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001295

    Original file (20110001295.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a memorandum, dated 7 April 2010, the Chief, Army Retirement Services, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1[Personnel Officer], Washington, D.C., informed DFAS that: a. the applicant had corrected his SBP election from "automatic" [spouse only coverage] to "spouse and children" based on full gross retired pay, retroactive to 2 October 2003; and b. the applicant was responsible for the premiums for the elected coverage. The election must be made before the effective date of retirement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008614

    Original file (20140008614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His request to cancel this debt is ineligible for a waiver. Following the applicant's retirement, he elected spouse SBP coverage. He did not pay SBP premiums and despite his non-payment, his spouse had the benefit of SBP coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008237

    Original file (20140008237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also provided a sworn statement from his spouse concurring with termination of SBP coverage. As a result of the Sabo Agreement, dated 11 August 2011, the applicant's discharge in 2003 was revoked and he was retroactively placed on the TDRL in 2012 with an effective date of 11 December 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant timely completed a DD Form 2656 electing not to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011734

    Original file (20100011734.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, she requests correction of her records to show, at the time she retired, she elected not to participate in the SBP. Although she and her spouse failed to make the election before her retirement, it appears the RSO counselor also failed to inform her or her spouse that the SBP election was required to be signed and dated before the effective date of her retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002298

    Original file (20150002298 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An email from DFAS confirmed the following: * the applicant notified DFAS of his divorce on 14 July 2014 * his premiums were suspended that same day * currently the applicant does not show a beneficiary for SBP * he requested reimbursement of all SBP premium payments dating from his divorce on 7 May 2003; a credit was issued for the past 6 years * the credit was given on 4 September 2014 7. The applicant provides: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013763

    Original file (20130013763.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage at the reduced amount and reimbursement of premiums collected due to being charged premiums for spouse coverage at the full amount. However, he provides an unsigned/archived DD Form 2656 that shows: * he and Ella were married on 24 May 2001 * he elected coverage for spouse * his election was based on a reduced amount of $675.00 6. As a...