Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018920
Original file (20100018920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  9 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018920 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests termination of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage and reimbursement of all paid premiums.

2.  He states he and his wife completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) indicating his desire not to participate in the SBP and signed the form in front of a notary public during his pre-retirement out-processing.  On the date of his final out-processing he attempted to submit the DD Form 2656 to the personnel office.  He was told that since he was declining SBP participation with his wife's notarized consent, he did not need to submit the form.  As a result, he kept the form and completed out-processing.

3.  He contends that upon receipt of his first retirement check, he noticed a deduction for SBP spouse coverage.  He contacted the out-processing office and was informed that there was nothing that they could do to resolve the matter.  He was advised that he could either submit an application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) or wait 2 years and then request to terminate SBP.

4.  He provides the following documents:

* retirement orders
* notarized DD Form 2656
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 August 1987 and served continuously through a series of reenlistments until he ultimately retired on 31 May 2010 in the rank/pay grade of master sergeant/E-8 with 22 years, 9 months, and 25 days of creditable active duty service.  He married his spouse J____ on 26 December 2007.

2.  On 30 March 2010, he completed a DD Form 2656.  He placed an "X" in item 26g of section IX (SBP Election) indicating he had eligible dependents under the plan and elected not to participate in the SBP.  He authenticated this form by placing his signature in the appropriate place.  His spouse J____ authenticated this form by placing her signature in the appropriate block on the same date and a notary public also authenticated this form by placing her signature and date in the appropriate blocks and embossing the form with her seal.

3.  Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of the DD Form 2656 instructs the applicant that "SBP spouse concurrence is required when a member is married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage.  The date of the spouse's signature in item 32b MUST NOT be before the date of the member's signature in item 30b."

4.  His Retiree Account Statement shows he currently has SBP spouse coverage based on the full amount.

5.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS) has no record of the applicant either accepting or declining SBP coverage.

6.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  The election must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to spouse coverage, if applicable.

7.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

8.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a 1-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse's concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement on 31 May 2010, the applicant and his wife elected to decline participation in the SBP with a notarized DD Form 2656, dated 30 March 2010.

2.  It appears his DD Form 2656 was not accepted during out-processing and forwarded to DFAS for processing and inclusion in his military pay records.  Accordingly, DFAS automatically initiated premium deductions for SBP spouse coverage in the full amount.

3.  Retirees normally have a 1-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse's concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.

4.  However, it appears the applicant was not properly counseled.  It is clear his intent was not to participate in the SBP as evidenced by the fact that he completed and authenticated the SBP form electing not to participate in SBP and his spouse concurred.  Although he and his spouse made the election before his retirement, it appears the Retirement Services Office counselor also failed to inform DFAS of his decision to decline participation.

5.  In the interest of equity and justice, his records should be corrected to show he elected not to participate in the SBP with his spouse's concurrence prior to the date of his retirement.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form 2656 on 30 March 2010 (2 months prior to the date he retired) electing not to participate in SBP and his spouse concurred with his decision on 30 March 2010 and it was properly notarized;

	b.  showing DFAS timely received and processed the appropriate form; and

	c.  reimbursing the applicant premiums that were already paid and canceling any debt as a result of this correction.



      _____________X____________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018920



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018920



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021185

    Original file (20110021185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 2 March 2011 * SBP Spouse Election Concurrence Statement, dated 8 March 2011 * Retiree Account Statement, dated 29 September 2011 * letter of explanation/correction request, dated 14 October 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. By law, his spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date he made this election but prior to the date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007522

    Original file (20100007522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends the DD Form 2656 that he completed on 27 October 2009 where he declined SBP spouse coverage should be honored and the SBP premiums refunded because both he and his spouse were present when he signed the document in the presence of an Army SBP counselor and notary public, respectively. The evidence of record confirms that on 27 October 2009, in his application for retired pay, the applicant declined to participate in SBP. The evidence shows that, for some period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012267

    Original file (20110012267.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement on 31 December 2010, the applicant and his wife elected to decline participation in the SBP with a duly witnessed and notarized DD Form 2656, dated 21 December 2010. In the interest of equity and justice, his records should be corrected to show he elected not to participate in the SBP with his spouse's concurrence prior to the date of his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012530

    Original file (20110012530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * SBP Spouse Election Concurrence Statement * Retiree Account Statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's Retiree Account Statement, dated 9 March 2011 (effective 1 April 2011), shows an SBP deduction for spouse coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form 2656,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018041

    Original file (20080018041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ABCMR analyst of record telephonically contacted the DFAS Retired Pay Office on 23 January 2009, which confirmed that the DD Form 2656, dated 10 July 2008 was not authenticated by the spouse on or after the date the applicant made his election. In a notarized statement, dated 27 January 2009, the applicant's spouse indicated that she had previously agreed with her husband's decision to not participate in the SBP and that she previously signed the one form provided by the Fort Drum, NY,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016366

    Original file (20100016366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that subsequent to receiving her 20-year letter, the applicant elected Option A wherein she declined enrollment at that time and deferred her SBP election to age 60. The evidence of record shows she retired on 6 May 2010, at age 60. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form 2656 on 30 March 2010 electing not to participate in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008254

    Original file (20080008254.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he and his spouse elected not to participate in the SBP; however, when they completed the DD Form 2656 (Date for Payment of Retired Personnel), she erroneously entered the date "20061214" instead of "20071214," resulting in a "default" spouse coverage based on the full amount. The applicant’s DD Form 2656, dated 14 December 2007, shows he elected “Not to participate in the SBP" and placed an "x" in Item 26g (I Elect Not to Participate in the SBP). As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001340

    Original file (20090001340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) to show his spouse concurred with his election made on 27 October 2008, not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), by showing that date in block 32b (Date Signed). As for the applicant's request for an expedited refund of the costs of the SBP already deducted from his retired pay account, the ABCMR only corrects military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007159

    Original file (20130007159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section IV (Coverage), she elected Option A - I decline to make an election until age 60; c. Section VIII (Member Signature), the applicant and a witness signed the document on 11 April 2013; d. Section IX (Spouse Concurrence): (1) item 20 (Spouse), "I hereby consent in my spouse's RCSBP election as indicated. However, it appears the applicant's spouse was not notified of the applicant's election to decline SBP because there is no evidence of record that shows a spouse concurrence letter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012463

    Original file (20080012463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 May 2008, the RSO sent the applicant’s spouse a letter informing her that the applicant had elected not to participate in the SBP. The letter stated "Your spouse, CSM R________ G. A______ has requested retirement from the military service to be effective July 1, 2008. Evidence of record shows that the applicant retired on 1 July 2008.