Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003410
Original file (20130003410.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  15 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003410 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests to be removed from the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  He states he did not receive his orders until 30-45 days after he had been retired.  A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) was completed, and he chose not to participate in the SBP.  His wife agreed, as shown by her notarized signature provided on 10 July 2012.  He didn't get good advice at the time of his retirement; therefore, he didn't know anything about the SBP.  He didn't even know a DD Form 2656 had to be completed.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 2656, orders, and an SBP/RSFPP (Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan) Premium Bill.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Kentucky Army National Guard (KYARNG) on 21 October 2001.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 19K (M1 Armor Crewman).  His record shows he was mobilized in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom from 30 November 2006 to 11 October 2007, and he served in Iraq from 23 December 2006 to 25 September 2007.  

2.  On 17 February 2009, a psychologist stated the applicant was not fit for duty due to symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI).  The psychologist indicated a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) was to be scheduled.  
3.  On 25 July 2011, an MEB found the applicant had four diagnoses that failed to meet retention standards and were medically unacceptable:  

* PTSD
* major depressive disorder
* chronic low back pain secondary to sacroilitis
* recurrent postconcussive headaches with frequent incapacitating attacks

The MEB referred him to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), and, on 12 August 2011, the applicant concurred with the MEB's approved findings and recommendations.  

4.  The applicant's record does not contain PEB proceedings.  However, the record does include U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Orders 
D-030-02, dated 30 January 2012, the placing him on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) effective 5 March 2012, with a 90 percent disability rating.  

5.  On 1 March 2012, Boone National Guard Center, Frankfort, KY, issued Orders 061-865 honorably discharging the applicant from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army effective 4 March 2012.  

6.  His record is void of documentation showing what counseling he received prior to his placement on the TDRL.

7.  He provides a DD Form 2656 showing:

* he elected not to participate in the SBP
* his signature, a witness signature, and his spouse's notarized signature, all dated 10 July 2012
* the witness signature is that of an SBP counselor at Fort Knox, KY

8.  He provides an SBP/RSFPP Premium Bill, dated 28 March 2013, showing he owed $784.54 in SBP premiums.

9.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse coverage (or child only coverage, if applicable).  

10.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provided less than maximum spouse coverage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows that, approximately 4 months after the effective date of his placement on the TDRL, the applicant attempted to elect not to participate in the SBP.  His spouse concurred with the election.  

2.  The DD Form 2656 he provides supports his statement that he didn't get good advice at the time of his retirement.  The SBP counselor who signed the form as a witness should have known that, because the applicant had retired approximately 4 months before the form was completed, his coverage had already defaulted to full spouse coverage.  The SBP/RSFPP Premium Bill he provides indicates this is what happened. 

3.  It appears the applicant may have been deprived of the opportunity to make a timely election not to participate in the SBP.  In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his record to show he made a timely election not to participate in the SBP prior to his retirement.  

4.  As a result of the proposed correction, any debt he has incurred due to the default election for full spouse coverage should be cancelled.

BOARD VOTE:

___X__  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he made a timely election not to participate in the SBP and cancelling 


any debt he has incurred as a result of a default election for full spouse coverage.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003410





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003410



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008928

    Original file (20070008928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 October 2007, DFAS informed this agency by email that the applicant used the wrong DD Form 2656 and signed it on 15 April 2007 after having been placed on the TDRL. The applicant alleges that she does not remember electing SBP; however, the evidence shows that she completed an SBP Election Certificate, DD Form 2656-5 (the incorrect form for a member being medically retired), on 15 April 2005, after placement on the TDRL. The applicant reviewed her Retiree Account Statement (SBP/RSFPP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000971

    Original file (20110000971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he received his first Retiree Account Statement (RAS) it showed he was enrolled in the SBP for full spouse coverage and that he had incurred a debt in excess of $3,000 for retroactive SBP premiums. Both the applicant's OMPF and ACTS are void of the DoD PDBR Record of Proceedings or any evidence showing corrective action was taken in the form of providing him: * TDRL orders * a revised DD Form 214 * Permanent disability retirement orders * a DD Form 2656 or any other form of SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012794

    Original file (20080012794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080012794 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 10 December 2007, the applicant's case was considered by an informal PEB. There is no specific form to be used when requesting cancellation of SBP and the applicant has applied to this Board for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007142

    Original file (20130007142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 February 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130007142 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 31 January 2011, the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) reviewed the applicant's record and recommended that he be permanently retired with a total combined disability rating of 40 percent. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provided less than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007817

    Original file (20140007817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was advised that the SBP premiums would be deducted from his Military Disability Retired Pay every month. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show his participation in the SBP was terminated effective 23 September 2013. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to by: a. showing his DD Form 2656-2 was received and processed on 23 September 2013; b. terminating his participation in the SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016683

    Original file (20130016683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant initially elected spouse only SBP coverage, was retired on 26 January 2011, and was placed on the TDRL on 27 January 2011. Here, it appears the applicant began having a panic attack due to his medical condition and felt pressured to agree to participate in the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 electing not to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029388

    Original file (20100029388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The spouse's signature MUST be notarized] of the DD Form 2656 is neither signed by his spouse to indicate her concurrence or non-concurrence with his election nor by a witness and/or retirement services officer. The evidence of record shows he retired on 13 July 2009 by reason of temporary disability. By law, his spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date he made this election but prior to the date of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002692

    Original file (20090002692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant elected not to participate in spousal SBP coverage on 25 March 2008. It would, therefore, be just and equitable to show that the applicant elected not to participate in the SBP on 25 March 2008 with her spouse’s concurrence on 26 March 2008, and to correct her applicable records to show her DD Form 2656 was accepted and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004305

    Original file (20120004305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100028330 on 23 June 2011. He applied to the Board to terminate his SBP coverage. Beginning 1 October 2008, a member who is at least 70 years of age and has made a minimum of 360 months of premium payments is eligible to have their monthly premiums stopped.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010019

    Original file (20130010019.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided a letter issued by DFAS on 31 March 2010, which indicated they had received the DASA’s directive and informed him that service members who retroactively become entitled to retired pay on a date after 20 September 1972 are automatically given full SBP coverage, unless the member elects to reduce the coverage or declines participation before the correction action (date of entitlement). The evidence of record shows the applicant was retroactively retired on 9 December 2009 with an...