Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022907
Original file (20110022907.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022907 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the countries of his overseas service.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show time served in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) page 3
* Special Orders (SOs) Number 36 and 55

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 

has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 26 September 1966.  He completed basic and advanced training and was assigned military occupational specialty 76R (Ordnance Supply Specialist).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 shows, in pertinent part, the following:

* Item 31 (Foreign Service) - Hawaii from 28 February 1967 through 13 September 1968
* Item 38 (Record of Assignment)

* 26 January 1967 - Enroute to USARPAC (U.S. Army Pacific Command)
* 28 February 1967 - 89th Ordnance Company (GM (General Maintenance)) (GS (General Support)), APO San Francisco (SF) 96558
* 1 December 1967 - 89th Ordnance Company (GS) (GM), APO SF 96558

4.  Headquarters, 50th Replacement Battalion issued the following:

* SOs Number 36, dated 11 February 1967, amending orders assigning the applicant to the 154th Transportation Company, APO San Francisco, from zip code 96491 to 96248
* SOs Number 36, dated 24 February 1967, assigning the applicant to the Overseas Incoming Detachment under the USARV (U.S. Army Vietnam)

5.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Schofield Barracks, APO SF issued SOs Number 42, dated 28 February 1967, assigning the applicant to the 89th Ordnance Company, APO SF, USARHAW (U.S. Army Hawaii).

6.  He was honorably released from active duty, as an overseas returnee on 21 September 1968, and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  His DD Form 214 credited him with 1 year, 6 months, and 24 days in Item 22 (Foreign and/or Sea Service) and does not show the last overseas theater, USARPAC in his case. 

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), dated 23 January 1967, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at the time stated:

* Item 22c lists the total active duty outside continental limits of the U.S. for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed, i.e. USARPAC 
* Item 30 lists the inclusive dates of service for Vietnam and indicating “yes” or “no” for service in Indochina and Korea; the entry would state for Vietnam service only, “Vietnam – the dates, Indochina-Yes, Korea-no”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served in USARPAC (Hawaii) from 28 February 1967 through 13 September 1968.  Item 22c of his DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 6 months, and 24 days of foreign service.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of Item 22c of his DD Form 214 to also show the entry USARPAC.

2.  There is no evidence in his active duty record and he has failed to provide substantiating evidence to show he served in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to add the entry, Vietnam and inclusive dates, to Item 30 of his DD Form 214.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to Item 22 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the entry, "USARPAC."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends 
denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction to Item 30 of his DD Form 214 by adding the entry, Vietnam and inclusive dates.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022907



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022907



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020430

    Original file (20130020430.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests the applicant's DD Form 214 be corrected to show his combat service. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 635-5, dated 22 May 1972, stated: * Item 22c would list the total active duty outside continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed, i.e., USARPAC * Item 30 would list service in Korea, Vietnam, or Indochina,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004119

    Original file (20140004119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 30 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show foreign service in Vietnam for 13 months instead of service in Thailand from 15 October 1966 to 28 September 1967. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 5 February 2014 * DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004119

    Original file (20140004119 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 30 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show foreign service in Vietnam for 13 months instead of service in Thailand from 15 October 1966 to 28 September 1967. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 5 February 2014 * DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015838

    Original file (20090015838.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Although his inclusive dates of service in Vietnam are not available, his DD Form 214 shows he had 11 months and 28 days of foreign service. Therefore, item 30 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he served in Vietnam from 5 January 1968 to 3 January 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510919C070209

    Original file (9510919C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending on 29 March 1968. The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), at item 31 (Foreign Service) indicates that he served in the U.S. Army, Pacific (USARPAC) from 17 April 1965 through 16 May 1966; that he served in the U.S. Army, Europe (USAREUR), from 22 June 1966 through 5 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013047

    Original file (20080013047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to add all his medals and that his service dates be corrected at the same time. However, based on his service in Vietnam he is entitled to correction of Item 30 to show his inclusive period of service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Items...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016901

    Original file (20130016901.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. With respect to correction of item 22c of the applicant's DD Form 214 ending on 11 July 1973; there is no documentary or other evidence in his service personnel record and he did not provide sufficient evidence to indicate or show that he served in Vietnam on a TDY or another basis or any other foreign service during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019315

    Original file (20130019315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. The evidence of record shows he received one bronze service star. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002103

    Original file (20130002103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Item 24 shows he was authorized one overseas service bar; however, he served in Vietnam for three 6-month periods during this period of service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016980

    Original file (20120016980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His service record contains no permanent change of station orders, TDY orders, or any other official documents that shows he was ordered to or served in Vietnam from September to December 1966. Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contained guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated that item 18f shows the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United...