IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 24 July 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130020430
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in Vietnam.
2. The applicant states the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) stated that he did not serve in combat and the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) stated that they have no record of him serving in combat. He is submitting copies of letters he wrote to his wife from Vietnam proving he was in country/combat.
3. The applicant provides no additional evidence.
COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:
1. Counsel requests the applicant's DD Form 214 be corrected to show his combat service.
2. Counsel states that according to the NPRC they were unable to locate any information to verify the applicant's military service.
3. Counsel provides twenty mailing envelopes for letters written by the applicant and his then girlfriend, the applicant's DD Form 214, and a letter from the NPRC.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 16 million service members records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed his records were destroyed in that fire. However, there was sufficient documentation submitted by the applicant's counsel for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.
3. Counsel provides:
a. The applicant's DD Form 214 which shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) on 17 December 1965. He served as an ammunition storage specialist. He was honorably released from active duty on 12 August 1968, at the expiration of his term of service, and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). He was credited with completing 1 year, 11 months, and 25 days of net active service. His DD Form 214 lists in:
* Item 22 (Foreign and/or Sea Service) - 1 year (USARPAC (U.S. Army Pacific))
* Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and two overseas service bars
* Item 30 (Remarks) does not show any dates of service for Vietnam
b. Twenty mailing envelopes, dated between 21 February 1966 through 2 October 1967, which show the applicant wrote letters to and received them from his girlfriend while he was stationed at Fort Benning, GA; Redstone Arsenal, AL; Fort Lewis, WA; and APO San Francisco (Vietnam).
c. A letter, dated 28 October 2013, wherein the NPRC advised the applicant that they had conducted extensive searches of every record source and alternate records sources; however, they had been unable to locate any information that would help them verify his military service.
4. On 10 July 2014, a staff member of the Board contacted the applicant's counsel and requested verification of the applicant's arrival/departure dates to/from Vietnam for the applicant. Counsel stated she would submit those dates to the Board on or before 15 July 2014. Counsel had not responded to the request by 17 July 2014.
5. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214. It stated the DD Form 214 would be prepared for all personal at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. The regulation stated:
* Item 22c - would list all periods of foreign service completed during the period of the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed, i.e., "USARPAC"
* There were no provisions for listing the country in which the last period of overseas service was performed and/or identifying the country as a combat zone in item 30 of the form
6. Army Regulation 635-5, dated 22 May 1972, stated:
* Item 22c would list the total active duty outside continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed, i.e., USARPAC
* Item 30 would list service in Korea, Vietnam, or Indochina, i.e., "Indochina-No, Vietnam-No, Korea-Yes"
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states:
a. The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States serving in Vietnam and contiguous waters or airspace there over, after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.
b. The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal is awarded by the Government of the Republic of Vietnam to members of the United States Armed Forces who have served in Vietnam for a period of 6 months.
c. Individuals are awarded specific awards for being engaged in actual combat, or duty that is equally as hazardous as combat duty, during the operation with armed opposition, i.e., the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The available evidence shows the applicant was inducted into the AUS on 17 December 1965. He was honorably released from active duty on 11 December 1967. He was issued a DD Form 214 showing he served in USARPAC for a period of one year.
2. The applicant served in Vietnam as evidenced by his awards of the Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, two overseas service bars, and the entry in item 22c (foreign service) of his DD Form 214. However, his exact dates of arrival to and departure from Vietnam are unknown. In the absence of the exact dates, it is not possible to make a correction to his DD Form 214 at this time.
3. However, based on the May 1972 regulatory guidance, Item 30c would show service in Vietnam. Therefore, as a matter of equity, the entry, "Indochina-No, Korea-No, Vietnam-Yes" should be added to item 30 of his DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:
____x___ ___x____ ____x___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
adding to item 30 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the entry "Indochina-No, Korea-No, Vietnam-Yes."
_____________x____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130020430
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130020430
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018789
The evidence of record shows the applicant was ordered to active duty from the USAR and entered active duty on 13 August 1966. Item 17c of the DD Form 214 shows he entered on active duty on 13 August 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 17c of his DD Form 214 the entry 13 August 1968 and replacing it with the entry 13 August 1966 * adding to item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012919
It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Korea Defense Service Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea from 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense for 30 consecutive or for 60 nonconsecutive days. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007739
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. c. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal * adding to this DD Form 214 the: * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002103
c. Item 24 shows he was authorized one overseas service bar; however, he served in Vietnam for three 6-month periods during this period of service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003891
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period 26 January 1970 through 19 January 1973 to show he served in Vietnam. Army Regulation 635-5, dated 23 January 1967, (and subsequent changes or amendments) in effect at the time of the applicant's separation in July 1969 stated: * In item 22c, for enlisted personnel show the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016229
Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 does not show any service in Vietnam. Paragraph 1-31c(11) states an award for previous marksmanship weapons qualification is revoked automatically whenever an individual, upon completion of firing a record course for which the previous award was made, has not attained the same qualification. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017975
It specified that item 22c of the DD Form 214 would contain the total amount of active duty served outside the continental limits of the United States during the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed (e.g., USARPAC). Based on his service in Korea, he is authorized the Korea Defense Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006754
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 25 November 1970 through 24 November 1971, a period of 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 22c of the applicant's DD Form 214 the entry "0 8 1" and replacing it with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018284
His DD Form 214 shows in: a. item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), he completed 1 year and 22 days of foreign service but does not contain the name of the major overseas theater or command, in his case, U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC); b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) c. item 30 (Remarks), no entry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019315
While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. The evidence of record shows he received one bronze service star. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...