Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020567
Original file (20110020567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  15 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110020567 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records by removing from his official military personnel file (OMPF) the following two orders for the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM):

* Permanent Orders 049-061, 82nd Paratrooper Support Detachment, dated 18 February 2005
* Orders Number 082-005, 3rd Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment, dated     23 March 2006

2.  The applicant states Permanent Orders 140-14, 82nd Paratrooper Support Detachment, dated 20 May 2005 correctly awarded him the AGCM.  Therefore, the above two orders that are filed in his OMPF should be removed.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* Permanent Orders 049-061, 82nd Paratrooper Support Detachment, dated 18 February 2005
* Permanent Orders 140-14, 82nd Paratrooper Support Detachment, dated 20 May 2005
* Orders Number 082-005, 3rd Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment, dated 
23 March 2006




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  At the time the applicant submitted this application he was serving as a 
1st lieutenant, pay grade O-2, U.S. Army Reserve.

3.  Records show the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 April 2002.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 96B (Intelligence Analyst).

4.  A review of the applicant's OMPF revealed the following orders:

* Permanent Orders 049-061, 82nd Paratrooper Support Detachment, dated 18 February 2005, 1st Award of the AGCM - 23 April 2002 to 
22 April 2005
* Permanent Orders 140-14, 82nd Paratrooper Support Detachment, dated 20 May 2005, 1st Award of the AGCM - 23 April 2002 to 22 April 2205
* Orders Number 082-005, 3rd Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment, dated     23 March 2006, 2nd Award AGCM - 22 April 2002 to 21 April 2005

5.  On 22 April 2006, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  He had completed 4 years of creditable active service.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) provides that all personnel information recorded under the authority of this regulation is the property of the U.S. Government.

	a.  Once recorded, it will not be removed except as provided by law or this regulation.

	b.  Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file. The document will not be removed from or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by one or more of the following:

* Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)
* Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB)
* Army Appeal Boards
* Chief, Appeals and Corrections Branch, Human Resources Command (HRC)
* OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed
* Commander, HRC, as an approved policy change to this regulation
* Chief, Appeals Branch, National Guard Personnel Center

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by removing the following AGCM orders from his OMPF:

* Permanent Orders 049-061, 82nd Paratrooper Support Detachment, dated 18 February 2005
* Orders Number 082-005, 3rd Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment, dated     23 March 2006

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows that there are three different orders currently filed in the applicant's OMPF awarding him the AGCM for essentially the same period of service.  Accordingly, it would be appropriate to revoke and remove the two orders identified in paragraph 1 above.  Furthermore, the revocation orders should not be filed in the applicant's OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X __  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by revoking the following orders:

* Permanent Orders 049-061, 82nd Paratrooper Support Detachment, dated 18 February 2005
* Orders Number 082-005, 3rd Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment, dated     23 March 2006

2.  Furthermore, the revocation orders are not to be filed in the applicant's OMPF.




      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020567



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020567



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000030

    Original file (20150000030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His OMPF contains the following orders that awarded him the AGCM, listed chronologically by order date: * Headquarters, NTC and Fort Irwin Permanent Orders 90-46, dated 26 August 1993 (AGCM 1st Award, for the period 11 July 1990 to 10 July 1993) * Headquarters, NTC and Fort Irwin Permanent Orders 31-60, dated 4 April 1994 (AGCM 1st Award, for the period 11 July 1990 to 10 July 1993) * Detachment A, 90th Personnel Service Battalion (PSB) Permanent Orders 131-12, dated 4 November 1996 (AGCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009232C070206

    Original file (20050009232C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant’s request to have a memorandum, dated 19 November 1996 pertaining to denial of award to the AGCM removed from his records was carefully considered. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Department of the Army, 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry, Fort Drum, New York, memorandum dated 19 November 1996 and titled Denial of Good Conduct Medal, be removed from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001402

    Original file (20090001402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his official military personnel file (OMPF) on the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) be corrected by removing erroneous or duplicate orders concerning his third award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. This regulation also provides that once filed such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011537

    Original file (20140011537.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following orders be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF): a. BRAVO Detachment, 556th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 84-317, dated 24 March 2000, for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) for the period 29 January 1997 through 28 January 2000; and b. A review of the applicant's performance section of her OMPF in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed copies of the 24 March 2000 and 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004532

    Original file (20150004532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations. The applicant contends his request for removal of the AGCM disqualification documents that are filed in his OMPF should be reconsidered because he was not notified of or given the opportunity to respond to the commander's proposed disqualification action and he subsequently received the AGCM for the cited period of service. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008277C070206

    Original file (20050008277C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his OMPF has 5 different orders for his AGCM (4th Award) and he requests that 4 of the awards be removed from his OMPF. These orders awarded the applicant the AGCM (4th Award) for the period 29 January 1997 to 28 January 2000. Orders awarding the applicant the AGCM (1st through 3rd Award) are correct for those time periods in which the applicant served.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002193

    Original file (20090002193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 March 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090002193 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that Bravo Detachment, 18th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 045-104, dated 14 February 2001, awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period 29 March 1997 to 28 March 2000, be removed from his OMPF. The applicant’s first qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal should have been from 29 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002530

    Original file (20150002530 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a third Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) and each duty military occupational specialty (DMOS) in which he served. A DA Form 2166-8 (NCO Evaluation Report (NCOER) shows he was assigned for duty with Battery C, 1st Battalion 21st Field Artillery Regiment, 42nd Military Police Brigade during the period 1 August 2007 to 31 July 2008. Inasmuch as his OMPF does not show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009520

    Original file (20080009520.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant performed as an infantryman while serving in Iraq with A Company, 3rd Brigade, 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment while performing combat operations. However, there is no evidence to show his unit was engaged in active ground combat or that he was awarded the Combat infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting "SERVICE IN OPERATION ENDURING...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023180

    Original file (20100023180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states PO 26-886, dated 26 January 2001, is the appropriate order for the AGCM (2nd Award) that covers the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000. A review of his record shows the following awards are filed in the performance section of his OMPF: a. AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1994 to 5 October 1997 per PO 029-00014 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, on 29 January 1998; b. AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000 per PO...