Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017658
Original file (20110017658.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017658 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add military occupational specialty (MOS) 67R2OY1 (AH-64 Attack Helicopter Repairer-Transition) and the associated training course.

2.  The applicant states this was not important to him before, but it is now.  He is unemployed and this will help him get a job.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Army/American Council of Education Registry transcript which shows completion of the course.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After approximately 2 years of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-3 on 26 September 1997.

3.  After training, he served in as a Bradley fighting vehicle systems mechanic until August 2000 when he attended a 16-week course in AH-64A attack helicopter repair.  He completed the course on 12 December 2000 and was awarded MOS 67R1O.

4.  In December 2002, he was promoted to sergeant (E-5) and awarded MOS 67R2O Y1, both effective on 1 October 2002.

5.  On 30 October 2003, he was honorably discharged due to the completion of his required service.  Neither MOS 67R nor the training course is listed on his DD Form 214.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 requires in:

	a.  item 11 (Primary specialty), the listing of the MOS number, title, and time held (in months and years) of all specialties held for 1 year or more; and

	b.  item 14 (Military Education), the listing of all courses by title, number of weeks in duration, and year completed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed the 16-week attack helicopter repair course and was awarded MOS 67R on 12 December 2000.  He held this MOS until his discharge on 30 November 2003, a period of 2 years and 11 months and 19 days (rounded to 3 years).

2.  These details should be shown in addition to the current entries in item 11 and item 14 of his DD Form 214.




BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his 30 November 2003 DD Form 214:

	a.  in item 11, "67R2OY1 – AH-64 Attack Helicopter Repairer-Transition – 3 years"; and

	b.  in item 14 "AH 64A Attack Helicopter Repairer Course, 16 weeks, 2000."



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017658



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017658



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010614

    Original file (20140010614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) contain: a. Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) showing he served in MOS – * 63T, Track Vehicle Mechanic from 1 November 1998 to 10 September 2000; a period of 1 year, and 10 months * 15 R, Attack Helicopter Repairer from 11 September 2000 to 9 July 2008; a period of 7 years, and 10 months * 88 H, Cargo Specialist from 10 July 2008 to 19 December 2012; a period of 4 years, and 6 months b. DA Form(s) 1059 (Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011869

    Original file (20130011869.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * Certificate of completion of MOS 68J (Aircraft Fire Control Repairer) * Certificate of completion of MOS 68X (AH-64 Aircraft/Armament/Missile System Repairer Course) * DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), completion of the AH-64D Armament/Electrical/Aviation Systems Repairer Course * Certificate of completion of MOS 68Y (AH-64D Armament/Electrical/ Aviation Systems Repairer Course) * Joint Services Transcripts CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009053

    Original file (20140009053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) – 45K (Armament Repairer) and years and months he served in that specialty * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 2. He is therefore entitled to correction of item 11 of his DD Form 214 to show he served in MOS 45K...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050013063

    Original file (20050013063.doc) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010839

    Original file (20100010839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 21 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100010839 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant was released from active duty after completing his required active service and from the USAR as a result of his immediate enlistment in the TXARNG, neither by reason of physical disability. There is no evidence which shows he was unfit to perform his military duties upon his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024790

    Original file (20100024790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 6 February 2000, be corrected and that his subsequent DD Form 214 be corrected accordingly. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was awarded MOS 67R on 20 January 1994 and he held this MOS until he was REFRAD on 6 February 2000, which was 6 years and 1 month. Accordingly the DD Form 214 should be corrected.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001580

    Original file (20110001580.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the: * Valorous Unit Award (VUA) * Combat Service Identification Badge (CSIB) 2. Department of the Army General Order Number 1, dated 31 March 1996, awarded the 1st Battalion, 101st Aviation the VUA for service on 24 February 1991. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004308C070205

    Original file (20060004308C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 23 June 1994 through 22 June 1997. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 23 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086179C070212

    Original file (2003086179C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with an ending date of 31 March 1989 to show: Therefore, there is insufficient evidence upon which to correct his records to show he held MOS 11C for 23 years and 7 months. That so much of the application as it relates to correction of his DD Form 214, with an ending date of 31 March 1989, to show he held PMOS 67V for 16 years; MOS 67Y for 6 years and 3 months; MOS 67N for 17 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018219

    Original file (20080018219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the word "Disability" from item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The evidence of record shows the applicant suffered from a medical condition - chronic left ankle pain - that rendered her unable to satisfactorily perform the duties of her grade and military occupational specialty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s narrative reason for separation was assigned based...