Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014671
Original file (20110014671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  31 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014671 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his general under honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states he has suffered discrimination throughout his career in obtaining civil service jobs and the loss of education benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).  While he was still in the service he suffered the embarrassment and stigma of a loss of rank and pay, extra duty, restriction to the barracks, and being pulled from his duties as a military police officer.  He believes his marriage was adversely affected and eventually ruined as a result of the impact of these actions against him.

3.  He further states he believes his discharge status was the result of an unfortunate series of events which started when his wife began working at the post officers club.  They were going through a rough period in their marriage and she became friendly with the post commanding general.  It seemed as if his entire chain of command became involved in his marital affairs.  Prior to the dissolution of his marriage he never had any disciplinary actions against him.

4.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* 6 belt certificate in American combat karate 
* Military police school diploma
* Certificate of appreciation, Seneca Army Depot
* 4 certificates of completion
* 3 U.S. Army certificates of achievement
* General Education Development (GED) certificate
* General discharge certificate
* Certificate for civil claims and investigations
* Asset recovery agent
* 2 Shotokan certifications
* Newspaper clippings
* New Mexico Highlands University children's self defense
* Letter of recommendation
* Police athletic league, Puerto Rico
* NRI school of gunsmithing course, units 1 - 5
* Distinguished martial artist of 1999
* 2 Aikido and Aikijujutsu certificates
* VA Disability award letter
* Letter of eligibility, New York state civil service commission
* 2 security guard training certificates
* Résumé
* 2 Forklift safety course certificates
* 4 vocational training certificate

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in Regular Army duty on 19 October 1982.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 95B (Military Police).  The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/E-3.

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was stationed at Fort Belvoir, VA from on or about 11 March 1983 to 28 February 1985, where he was assigned to the 437th Military Police Company.
4.  His records reveal a history of negative counseling by his chain of command for various infractions including: 

* disobeying a lawful order
* careless attitude
* lack of self discipline 
* inappropriately addressing superiors
* being argumentative
* allowing personal problems to impact duty performance
* not being a team player
* failure to provide monetary support to his family

5.  His records show he receive punishment under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on the following three occasions:

* On 11 October 1983, for being absent without leave (AWOL) and failure to obey an order or regulation
* On 9 October 1984, for driving a one-quarter ton (M151A2) vehicle in a reckless manner by traveling at a speed of 52 miles per hour in a posted 40 mile per hour zone.
* On 28 January 1985, for disobeying a lawful order to report 

6.  On 16 January 1984, he received a letter of reprimand from his company commander.  The letter stated he was negligent because he failed to control his vehicle resulting in an accident while in the performance of his duties as a military police officer.

7.  A DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) in his record shows that on 24 October 
1984, at approximately 3:00 am, he was seen climbing out of a female's barracks room window.  His records contain a DA Form 3881 (Rights Warning Procedure/Waiver Certificate), dated 27 October 1984, indicating that his company commander questioned him about his suspected violation of the company's visitation policy.

8.  His records contain 3 dishonored check notifications from the Army and Air Force Exchange Services for:

* 5 October 1984, for 3 checks totaling $150.00
* 11 October 1984, for 1 check totaling $45.00
* 18 October 1984, for 3 checks totaling $120.00


9.  On 17 December 1984, his commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for a pattern of misconduct.  On this same day, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification.

10.  On 18 December 1984, he consulted with legal counsel and he was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation, the possible effects of a general under honorable conditions discharge, and the rights available to him.  He indicated his intent to submit statements in his own behalf.

11.  On 24 January 1985, his company commander completed a DA Form 
4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate) recommending that the applicant not be permitted to reenlist.  The applicant signed the form and indicated that he did not wish to make a statement on his behalf.

12.  On 25 February 1985, the separation authority approved his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of misconduct – pattern of misconduct.

13.  On 28 February 1985, he was discharged accordingly.  His DD Form 214 shows he received a general under honorable conditions discharge by reason of a pattern of misconduct.  He completed 2 years, 4 months, and 10 days of creditable active service.  He was discharged in the rank/grade of private/
E-2.

14.  There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

15.  The applicant has provided several certificates of completion showing that he has attained the level of black belt in karate, completed his GED, and several vocational and training courses.  He has also provided certificates of achievement and appreciation, newspaper clippings and documentation to show he has taught children's self defense courses.

16.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.  However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier’s overall record.

17.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The dissolution of his marriage is unfortunate; however he has not provided convincing and clear cut evidence to show that the problems in his marital relationship caused his misconduct.

2.  His request that his record be corrected to upgrade his general under honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge was carefully considered and determined to be without merit.

3.  His record of indiscipline clearly does not meet the standards of acceptable conduct for Army personnel.  Therefore, he is not entitled to an upgrade of his discharge.

4.  The evidence shows he was properly and equitably discharged in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time.  Further, the applicant's discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  __x______  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _x   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014671



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014671



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201141

    Original file (0201141.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded, indicating that nothing can change the facts or the past. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his general discharge should be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009051

    Original file (20120009051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1992 correctly shows the number of AAMs he is entitled to. With respect to additional awards of the ARCOM, evidence of record shows orders awarded him two awards of the ARCOM and his DD Form 214 shows these awards. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * adding to additional awards of the AAM, ARCOM, and his appreciation and service certificates to his DD Form 214 * adding the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00772

    Original file (MD00-00772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 920908: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (3 specs):Specification 1: Make and utter check #578 to MWR 0150 for the amount of $14.25 and did thereafter dishonorably fail to maintain sufficient funds for payment on 920718. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued940419: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070001C070402

    Original file (2002070001C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that on 17 May 1978, he entered the Regular Army for 3 years and that he continuously served on active duty for 3 years and 2 days, until being honorably separated for the purpose of immediate reenlistment on 18 May 1981. On 2 January 1985, the separation authority approved the separation action and directed that the applicant receive an UOTHC discharge for a pattern of misconduct and the commission of a serious offense under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006445C070208

    Original file (20040006445C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 9 October 1985, in which he requested leave approval to attend classes at General Motors Training Center in Kansas to get up to date information in order to pass certification test in the month of December 1986. On 18 February 1986, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was being recommended for separation under the provisions of paragraph 14-12b (Patterns of Misconduct) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00331

    Original file (MD00-00331.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the discharge was not too harsh taking into account the applicant’s service record and conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00594

    Original file (MD00-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00594 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000411, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 6 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 85 Highest Rank: LCpl Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Proficiency: 4.28 (8) Conduct: 3.9 (8) Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: MUC, NDSM, GCM Days of Unauthorized...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00195

    Original file (ND01-00195.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00195 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001205, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00277

    Original file (MD01-00277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00277 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010103, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide anything to indicate or to show that there exists an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion associated with his discharge at the time of its issuance, and that his rights were...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00080

    Original file (ND00-00080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000803. Sentence: Fined $445, attend Alcohol Driver Education Course (Level I-NADSAP) and complete by 5Aug94. 960221: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.960228: Applicant apprehended by civilian authorities on charges of violation of probation, failure to report and pay court ordered fines...