Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00594
Original file (MD00-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD00-00594

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000411, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed CIVILIAN COUNSEL as his representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 001102. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Pattern of misconduct (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. The petitioner believes that his service of 3 years, 5 months, and 5 days should reflect the character of a discharge from the Armed Forces.

2. In addition, the petitioner has led an exemplary life since his discharge. In support of this petition, additional documentation will be forwarded.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Character Reference Letters (7)
Letter from Applicant's Attorney

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                870803 - 880727  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 880728               Date of Discharge: 911231

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 05 04
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 6

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 85

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.28 (8)             Conduct: 3.9 (8)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: MUC, NDSM, GCM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 3

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Pattern of misconduct (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

891121:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Financial irresponsibility, writing checks without sufficient funds to pay them. SNM advised to complete the MCI Personal Finance course]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
900731:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [An undiscerning attitude towards personal appearance, selective obedience to orders or regulations and fiduciary obligations] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
901119:  Applicant terminated from government quarters for maintaining a canine pet in direct violation of 2 warnings, maintaining unsanitary conditions in quarters, and unsecured weapons and ammunition scattered around quarters.
910114:  Summary Court-Martial:
 Charge I: violation of UCMJ, Article 90: Willfully disobeyed a lawful command on or about 901128 from BGen J. E. L____ to immediately remove his dog from the Combat Center and to stop maintaining canine pets while living in government quarters aboard the Combat Center.
Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 92: On or about 901128, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by the CG, MCAGCC to stop maintaining canine pets while living in government quarters, failed to obey the same by maintaining canine pets in government quarter.
Findings: to Charge specification and I hereunder, dismissed; to Charge II and specification hereunder, guilty.
Sentence: Forfeiture of $557.00 per month for 1 month, reduction to E-2.
CA (910122) Approved and ordered executed.
910419:  UA from 0500, 910419 to 1400, 910423 (3days).

910501:  Applicant tried at the San Bernardino County Municipal Court for transportation of a controlled substance on 910419. Dismissed with prejudice for USMC to prosecute.

910822:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Did to MWR a certain check, in words and figures, to wit: $100.00, funds for payment of such a check in full upon its presentment for payment.
         Award: Reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
911114:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
911114:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

911114:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was your discreditable involvements with civil and military authorities.

911211:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 911231 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant’s service in the Marine Corps was accurately reflected in his characterization of other than honorable. The applicant received several counseling’s regarding his behavior, had a Summary Court martial and CO’s NJP. The applicant was also charged in the civilian community with transportation of drugs. The applicant had conduct marks of 3.9, which the Board considered below average. The Board voted unanimously that the applicant’s service is accurately characterized as having been served under other than honorable conditions. No relief granted.

In response to the applicant’s issue 2, there is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided ample documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00772

    Original file (MD00-00772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 920908: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (3 specs):Specification 1: Make and utter check #578 to MWR 0150 for the amount of $14.25 and did thereafter dishonorably fail to maintain sufficient funds for payment on 920718. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued940419: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00359

    Original file (MD00-00359.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00359 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000121, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.The following is provided for the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00277

    Original file (MD01-00277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00277 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010103, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide anything to indicate or to show that there exists an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion associated with his discharge at the time of its issuance, and that his rights were...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00399

    Original file (MD00-00399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    931020: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to Minor disciplinary infractions and misconduct due to a Pattern of misconduct.931020: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ, Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.931028: Commanding officer recommended discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01136

    Original file (MD02-01136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Continued involvement with civilian and military authorities, specifically, failure to maintain sufficient funds in checking account and failure to pay owed bills in a timely manner. Counseled concerning deficiencies: malingering, disobeying a lawful order, making false statements. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The Applicant introduced no...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00769

    Original file (MD00-00769.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PVT, USMC Docket No. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant (4pgs) Reference Letters (3) Copies of DD Form 214 (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 870828 - 880726 COG Period of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00482

    Original file (MD01-00482.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CA 950222: Sentence is approved and ordered executed (but execution of that portion of the sentence adjudging forfeiture of $395 pay per month for 1 month is suspended for a period of 6 months, at which time unless sooner vacated, the suspended portion of the sentence will be remitted without further action).950222: To confinement.950318: Returned to full duty.950405: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00508

    Original file (MD04-00508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00508 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040203. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. [On July 23 a warrant for your arrest on two cases of issuance of a worthless check, case numbers issued by the Onslow County Sherifffs Department are #02CR 055017 and #02CR 056426.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00250

    Original file (MD00-00250.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.980120: Applicant informed eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the promotion period Jan/Feb/Mar 98 because of assigned to weight control program.980123: Vacate suspended forfeiture of $205.00 for 2 months and restriction and extra duty for 30 days awarded at CO's NJP dated 21Aug97. After a thorough review of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01029

    Original file (MD02-01029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I’m asking my discharge be upgraded to honorable because I can't get any benefits, and I have a serious medical condition (my back) (severe epidermal fibrosis) I had one surgery in the Marine Corps and I now need another one again. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted...