Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013074
Original file (20110013074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110013074 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB).

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  He served with the 1st Medical Company in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in direct support of infantry units from 2 September 1967 to 28 October 1968.
   
   b.  He details his unit's history and the hazardous duties he performed as a medic indicating he was subject to frequent rocket, mortar fire, and sapper attacks.
   
   c.  He recently learned a Soldier with whom he served and who died in Vietnam was awarded the CMB.  He performed the same duties in Vietnam as this Soldier.
   
3.  The applicant provides a:

* Self-authored statement
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 27 March 1967.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist).  He was honorably separated in the rank/grade of specialist four/E-4 on 30 October 1968 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).

3.  The applicant’s records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 2 September 1967 to 28 October 1968.  He was assigned to the 1st Medical Company and performed duties as an ambulance orderly/driver.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded: 

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* Two Overseas Service Bars

5.  There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the CMB.

6.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20.


7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the CMB is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat.  Battle participation credit is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy and the Soldier must have been personally present and under fire during such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the CMB.

2.  The applicant's medical MOS and service in the Republic of Vietnam are not in question.

3.  However, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size which engaged in active ground combat.  In the absence of evidence that the applicant was personally present while the infantry unit was in contact with the enemy there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the CMB in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 





are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013074



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110013074



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016548

    Original file (20110016548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). Combat service only does not support award of the CMB. Absent evidence showing the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB by proper authority while serving in the RVN, or that confirms his presence and participation with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the CMB has not been satisfied in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005343

    Original file (20110005343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. it is very disturbing to know his service to his country, in a place that can only be described as "hell on earth," was not correctly documented thereby causing his entitlements to be questioned; b. he has an official photograph showing that he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); he was wearing the CMB and the rank of specialist five (SP5) which is contrary to the Board's Record of Proceedings (ROP) which indicates the highest rank he attained was private...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017540

    Original file (20070017540.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, counsel presents the following arguments: a. the Board erred in denying the applicant his CMB based on a determination that he was not assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size and that the word “or” is a mutually exclusive criterion that does not require the unit of attachment or assignment to be organic to an infantry unit; b. the medical officer’s statement and evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059318C070421

    Original file (2001059318C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he earned the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. Although there is no evidence to show that the applicant served as a combat medical aidman with this unit and was personally present when the unit was under hostile fire and actively engaged in ground combat, the Board does find sufficient supporting evidence to show his last duty assignment was HHC, 2 nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008898

    Original file (20130008898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that shows he was awarded the CMB. However, it did provide detailed guidance for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, which was awarded to infantry personnel based on essentially the same criteria for award of the CMB to medical aid personnel assigned to infantry units.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003524

    Original file (20130003524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). The evidence shows he was awarded a medical MOS and he served in combat with an artillery unit. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009311

    Original file (20090009311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's medical MOS and his service in the RVN are not in question. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007981C070208

    Original file (20040007981C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. The evidence of record does show that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the MUC, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4 bronze service stars with his VSM. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007034

    Original file (20130007034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The governing regulation for award of the CMB states the CMB may be awarded to medical department personnel who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Unfortunately, the applicant has not provided any corroborating evidence showing he participated in ground combat with his infantry unit. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to...