Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009311
Original file (20090009311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009311 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). 

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he should have been awarded the CMB because he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B as a senior medical corpsman and he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RNV) from June 1967 to May 1968.

3.  The applicant submitted a self-authored statement and a copy of a letter to the "Veterans Administration and those concerned with PTSD [Post Traumatic Stress Disorder]" in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and he entered active service on 17 August 1966.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded MOS 91B (Medical Corpsman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in Item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he served in the RVN in MOS 91B with the principal duty as a senior medical aidman assigned to the 616th Medical Company (Clearing) from 7 June 1967 to 30 April 1968.  He further served with the 563rd Medical Company, 67th Medical Group from 1 May to 26 May 1968 in the same MOS and principal duty.

4.  On 27 May 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing a total of 1 year, 9 months, and 11 days of active military service.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the CMB. 

5.  There are no orders in the available records which show the applicant was awarded the CMB.

6.  The applicant submitted a self-authored statement outlining his experiences and qualifications in the military in support of his application.

7.  The applicant submitted a copy of a letter to the VA and those concerned with PTSD outlining his experiences while working on wounded Soldiers in the operating room while in the RVN.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Medical Badge is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat.  Battle participation credit is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy and the Soldier must have been personally present and under fire during such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contention that he should have been awarded the CMB because he held MOS 91B and that he served in the Republic of Vietnam was carefully considered.
2.  The applicant's medical MOS and his service in the RVN are not in question.  Additionally, the applicant's sincerity with regard to his participation and/or 
performance of his duties as a medic in a combat zone in the RVN is also not in question.

3.  However, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit any substantiating evidence that shows he was assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size which engaged in active ground combat.  In the absence of such evidence, the applicant does not meet the eligibility requirement for the CMB.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____ ___  ___ ____  ____ ____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  _______  _________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  __X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009311



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011732

    Original file (20120011732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). Battle/combat service alone does not support award of the CMB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016548

    Original file (20110016548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). Combat service only does not support award of the CMB. Absent evidence showing the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB by proper authority while serving in the RVN, or that confirms his presence and participation with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the CMB has not been satisfied in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004699

    Original file (20090004699.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 September 1968 through 29 September 1971, and to add it to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015502

    Original file (20090015502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). As a result, the NPRC letter is not sufficient as a basis for entitlement to a military award or for correction of military records to show a military award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007981C070208

    Original file (20040007981C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. The evidence of record does show that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the MUC, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4 bronze service stars with his VSM. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006635

    Original file (20110006635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110006635 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and four bronze service stars to be worn with his Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________X________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010726

    Original file (20130010726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The governing regulation for award of the CMB states the CMB may be awarded to medical department personnel who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Unfortunately, the applicant has not provided any corroborating evidence showing he participated in ground combat with an infantry unit. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007034

    Original file (20130007034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The governing regulation for award of the CMB states the CMB may be awarded to medical department personnel who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Unfortunately, the applicant has not provided any corroborating evidence showing he participated in ground combat with his infantry unit. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000518

    Original file (20150000518.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080010460 on 7 October 2008. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), item 38 (Record of Assignments) show during his RVN tour, he was assigned to Company B and Company D, 9th Medical Battalion, 9th Infantry Division, performing duties in MOS 05B as a radio...