Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016548
Original file (20110016548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016548 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). 

2.  The applicant states he was a combat medical corpsman (Medic) in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), emergency leave orders, and envelope with unit return address in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The record shows the applicant was inducted into the Army on 12 October 1966, and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist).  

3.  The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant served in the RVN from 14 December 1967 through 17 February 1968.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour, he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion (Airborne), 501st Infantry Regiment, performing duties in MOS 70A as a clerk through 19 January 1968, and as a company aidman through 17 February 1968.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the CMB in the list of earned awards entered.  

4.  The applicant’s record is void of documents or orders indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB, or that confirms his presence and participation with his unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  

5.  On 11 October 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty, in the rank of specialist four/E-4, after completing 2 years of active military service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not include the CMB in the list of authorized awards.  It does show he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure:

* National Defense Service Medal (NDSM)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* Parachutist Badge
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)
* Army Good Conduct Medal

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army’s awards policy.  Chapter 8 contains guidance on Badges and Tabs of U.S. Origin and paragraph 8-7 contains guidance on award of the CMB.  It states the CMB may be awarded to members of the Army Medical Department (Colonels and below), the Naval Medical Department (Captains and below), the Air Force Medical Service (Colonels and below), assigned or attached by appropriate orders to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, or to a medical unit of company or smaller size, organic to an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period the infantry unit is engaged in actual ground combat on or after 6 December 1941.  Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy. 


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to be awarded the CMB has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim. 

2.  By regulation, in order to support award of the CMB there must not only be evidence that the member was assigned to a qualifying infantry unit but also that he was present and participated with that unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  Combat service only does not support award of the CMB. 

3.  The evidence of record shows that during his RVN tour, the applicant while assigned to a qualifying infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size was in fact assigned to headquarters element and not a traditional line infantry company of that unit.  In addition, it shows for the majority of the time he served in the RVN, he was performing duties as a clerk and only preformed duties as a company aid man for less than a month.  

4.  Absent evidence showing the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB by proper authority while serving in the RVN, or that confirms his presence and participation with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the CMB has not been satisfied in this case.  Therefore, it would not be appropriate or serve the interest of all those who served in the RVN and who faced similar circumstances to award the applicant the CMB at this late date. 

5.  The applicant and all others concerned should know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016548



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016548



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011732

    Original file (20120011732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). Battle/combat service alone does not support award of the CMB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006293

    Original file (20120006293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 16 October 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120006293 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Although he provided letters and a 2-page Vietnamese document showing he was in the RVN, this alone does not show he participated in combat. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence showing he was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB by proper authority while serving in the RVN, or that confirms his presence and participation with his qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059176C070421

    Original file (2001059176C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was assigned to an airborne infantry battalion as a unit medical aidman throughout his tour in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009311

    Original file (20090009311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's medical MOS and his service in the RVN are not in question. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020149

    Original file (20130020149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). However, there is no evidence and the applicant did not submit any evidence to show he was assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size which engaged in active ground combat. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010726

    Original file (20130010726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The governing regulation for award of the CMB states the CMB may be awarded to medical department personnel who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Unfortunately, the applicant has not provided any corroborating evidence showing he participated in ground combat with an infantry unit. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010879

    Original file (20090010879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 38 shows that while serving in the RVN he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 22nd Infantry Regiment, performing duties in MOS 91A as a radio telephone operator and 91B as a medical specialist, and item 41(Awards and Decorations) shows he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), 1 Overseas Service Bar, RVN Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010106C071029

    Original file (20060010106C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. However, there are no orders, or other documents on file that show he was ever recommended for, or awarded either the CIB or CMB while he was serving on active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s combat service in the RVN; however, combat service alone does not support award of the CMB or CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005343

    Original file (20110005343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. it is very disturbing to know his service to his country, in a place that can only be described as "hell on earth," was not correctly documented thereby causing his entitlements to be questioned; b. he has an official photograph showing that he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); he was wearing the CMB and the rank of specialist five (SP5) which is contrary to the Board's Record of Proceedings (ROP) which indicates the highest rank he attained was private...