Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059318C070421
Original file (2001059318C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 2 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059318


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he earned the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. He also requests that the last duty assignment listed in block 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be changed to show the correct unit.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not show he earned the CMB and also does not include all the awards and decorations to which he is entitled. He further states that block 12 of his DD Form 214 should read Headquarters & Headquarters Company (HHC), 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he had 3 years of prior honorable service from 23 July 1962 to 22 July 1965 and reenlisted in the Army for a period of 3 years on 22 October 1965. He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist) and served at Fort Bragg, North Carolina until being reassigned to Vietnam with his unit.

5. The applicant arrived in Vietnam on 13 February 1967 and served there for
20 months until departing for separation processing on 14 October 1968. His Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) confirms in block 35 (Record of Assignments) that during his tenure in Vietnam he served primarily with Headquarters Battery, 1st Howitzer Battalion, 92nd Artillery as a senior medical aidman and section sergeant through at least 19 September 1967. This is the last effective date entry contained in block 35 and there is only one subsequent entry that shows he was reassigned to HHC, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 1st Brigade, 101st Airborne Division just prior to departing from Vietnam. However, this entry contains no clear effective date and there is no indication anywhere in the record that shows he ever actually served with this unit as a medical aidman in combat.

6. Further, the only other documentation in the record that would shed light on the applicant’s unit of assignment in Vietnam subsequent to 13 September 1967 is a General Order (GO) Number 1461, dated 12 June 1968, issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division. This order awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds he received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on
11 May 1968. It indicates in the standard name line that the applicant’s unit of assignment at the that time was Headquarters and Headquarters Battery,
2nd Howitzer Battalion, 320th Artillery.


7. Special Order Number 288, dated 14 October 1968, issued by the United States Army Personnel Center, Oakland, California, which authorized the applicant’s release from active duty does contain an entry that shows his last permanent assignment was HHC, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment,
101st Airborne Division. However, the DD Form 214 contains the following entry in block 12: “HHC 2/302 Inf Abn Div”.

8. The applicant’s separation document also shows that he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: Purple Heart, Bronze Star Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Good Conduct Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device, and National Defense Service Medal and that on 14 October 1968, he was honorably discharged in the rank and pay grade of staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6).

9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Medical Badge is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Battle participation credit is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy.

10. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) establishes the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. This publication confirms that, during his tenure of assignment with them, the applicant’s units earned the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the CMB should be added to his record but finds insufficient evidence to support this claim. By regulation, in order to receive the CMB a member must have been assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat.

2. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded or recommended for the CMB. In addition, there is no indication that he was ever assigned to an eligible unit and was personally present with that unit when it was under hostile fire and actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. In addition, the record clearly shows that he was assigned to an Artillery unit for the preponderance of his tour in Vietnam and at the time he was wounded in action. Thus, the Board concludes there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to award him the CMB.


3. Although there is no evidence to show that the applicant served as a combat medical aidman with this unit and was personally present when the unit was under hostile fire and actively engaged in ground combat, the Board does find sufficient supporting evidence to show his last duty assignment was HHC,
2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division and it concludes his separation document should be corrected list this unit in block 12.

4. Further, Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 confirms that during his assignment tenure, units the applicant served with in Vietnam earned the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal. Therefore, the Board concludes that he is entitled to these awards and they should be added to his record at this time.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records, particularly the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned corrected by showing his last unit of assignment was HHC, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division, and that he earned the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal Unit Citation.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__MKP___ __KAK__ __RTD__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Margaret K. Patterson _
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059318
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2001/10/02
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059176C070421

    Original file (2001059176C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was assigned to an airborne infantry battalion as a unit medical aidman throughout his tour in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016548

    Original file (20110016548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). Combat service only does not support award of the CMB. Absent evidence showing the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB by proper authority while serving in the RVN, or that confirms his presence and participation with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the CMB has not been satisfied in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005211C070206

    Original file (20050005211C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 December 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050005211 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Item 38 (Record of Assignment) is void of any entry showing his unit of assignment while serving in the RVN, and Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the CIB in the list of authorized awards entered. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010946

    Original file (20140010946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his DD Form 214 does not show award of the Parachutist Badge * his last duty assignment was Company D, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division, USARPAC * his MOS was 11B1P, not 54A1O (chemical operations apprentice) * he served in Vietnam from 23 August 1967 to 8 December 1968 * his DD Form 214 does not reflect his proper military service at discharge 3. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021784

    Original file (20120021784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add the following awards: * Combat Medical Badge (CMB) * Air Medal (AM) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The evidence of record confirms the applicant held a medical MOS and served with a qualifying unit necessary for the award of the CMB, while that unit earned the VUA and MUC. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016888

    Original file (20140016888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; he must be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and he must actively participate in such ground combat. Records show he participated in two campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam; therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015092C080407

    Original file (20070015092C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also provides orders that awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in action in the RVN on this same date, while serving as a platoon Medic for this same unit. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in connection with the 15 June 1968 action in question, while he was serving as a platoon Medic with Company E, 2nd Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant received a second award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006293

    Original file (20120006293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 16 October 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120006293 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Although he provided letters and a 2-page Vietnamese document showing he was in the RVN, this alone does not show he participated in combat. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence showing he was ever recommended for or awarded the CMB by proper authority while serving in the RVN, or that confirms his presence and participation with his qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004699

    Original file (20090004699.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 September 1968 through 29 September 1971, and to add it to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 30...