Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028423
Original file (20100028423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100028423 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage or reinstatement of his former spouse's SBP coverage.

2.  The applicant states the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS):

   a.  failed to respond to his 21 March 2001 request for information regarding SBP coverage for his ex-spouse;
   
   b.  continued to withhold monthly SBP premiums 9 years after his divorce;
   
   c.  caused him to believe the information he submitted in his 21 March 2001 letter was satisfactory to maintain SBP coverage for his ex-spouse because SBP premiums were continually deducted from his retired pay 9 years after his divorce.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Self-authored statement
* Letter to DFAS, dated 1 March 2001
* DFAS Letter 31 August 2010
* DFAS Letter 1 November 2010
* Judgement of Dissolution of Marriage

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military record shows that after having prior enlisted service, he was commissioned a second lieutenant (2LT) in the U.S. Army Reserve and entered active duty on 18 June 1959.  He served in area of concentration 1193 (Field Artillery).

2.  The applicant and his former spouse were married on 2 May 1959.  The FSM retired on 30 June 1987, after completing 28 years and 13 days of creditable active duty service.  At that time, he elected to participate in the SBP for spouse only coverage, reduced base amount.

3.  On 28 December 2000, the applicant and his former spouse were divorced.  The marital settlement agreement was approved and incorporated in the final judgment.  Section 2.-5, page 7 of the marital settlement agreement stated, in pertinent part, "Wife will continue to be covered under Husband's Military Survivor's Benefit Program and Husband's Department of the Army Retirement Plan."

4.  On 1 November 2010, DFAS notified the applicant of the following:

   a.  there was a one-year window from the date of his 28 December 2000 divorce during which he could have elected former spouse coverage under the SBP or the former spouse may have deemed the election based on the court order awarding SBP coverage;
   
   b.  since the one-year period passed on 28 December 2001, his request to elect former spouse SBP coverage, dated 16 Aril 2010, could not be honored;
   
   c.  his 1 March 2001 correspondence did not indicate any request related to his SBP or an election for former spouse coverage;
   
   d.  former spouse coverage is not an automatic benefit; and
   
   e.  the only means by which the divorced spouse may receive a survivor annuity is if former spouse coverage is elected; a court order by itself cannot institute automatic coverage.

5.  During the processing of this case, a staff member of the Board contacted DFAS to determine the applicant's current SBP enrollment status.  On 7 June 2011, a DFAS official confirmed:

* the applicant's enrollment in the SBP was terminated in the year 2010 with an effective date of 28 December 2010, the date of the divorce (however, the actual date termination was accomplished was not provided)
* a refund of prior premiums paid dating back the last 6 years through 10 May 2004 was refunded to the applicant in the amount of $10,097.00 on 30 June 2010

6.  On 29 June 2011, the applicant indicated his understanding and willingness to repay DFAS the former SBP premiums refunded him in the actual amount of $7,226.15, which was the amount he received of $10,097.00 after all deductions were made.

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

8.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.  

9.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).

10.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

11.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce.  If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By law, incident to a proceeding of divorce, a member has one year to provide an annuity to a former spouse by making such an election.  The law also permits the former spouse concerned to request a former spouse SBP coverage election be deemed to have been made within one year of the date of a court order of divorce.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant and his former spouse were divorced on 28 December 2000.  The divorce decree directed that both parties comply with the terms of a property settlement agreement they had entered into, which included continued SBP coverage for the applicant as former spouse.

3.  The applicant provides sufficient evidence to show he immediately informed the DFAS of his divorce and inquired what portion of the decree he needed to submit to DFAS in hopes that the required actions stipulated in marital settlement agreement would be accomplished.  Although the available evidence does not show he specifically requested SBP former spouse coverage upon his divorce, he continuously paid SBP premiums since the divorce on 28 December 2000 through the year 2010, for more than 9 years, which corroborates his claim he believed the former spouse SBP election had been made.  It also appears he has not remarried.  If he had he would not have received a full refund of premiums.

4.  In establishing the SBP, it was the intent of Congress to provide for those spouses who supported the military member for the majority of his or her military career.  The applicant was married to the former spouse for more than 41 years which included his entire military career of over 28 years.  The court awarded the former spouse SBP beneficiary status in the marital settlement agreement portion of the divorce decree.  The applicant made her his SBP beneficiary at the time of his retirement from active duty.  Therefore, in the interest of justice and equity, it would be appropriate to correct the record to comply with the divorce decree providing SBP coverage for the applicant's former spouse.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 
 
________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the applicant changed his SBP spouse coverage to former spouse SBP coverage on 29 December 2000, the day after their divorce; and 

   b.  advising the applicant DFAS will be instructed to collect the previous refund of SBP premiums he received and any additional SBP premium costs due.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028423





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100028423



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015433

    Original file (20090015433.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a copy of a DA Form 2656-1, dated 21 July 2008, showing he requested a change in election coverage due to divorce from spouse to former spouse. He states he provided DFAS with a copy of his divorce decree and to date has not remarried; however, DFAS maintains the applicant did not notify them within 1 year of the divorce of his election for former spouse coverage as required by the SBP statute. There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant's intent was to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012119

    Original file (20100012119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the FSM’s SBP election was in effect on the date of divorce * the FSM intended she be maintained the beneficiary of his SBP as stated Exhibit A of the divorce decree * the FSM was not aware of his requirement to confirm his SBP election of coverage subsequent to their divorce 3. The FSM and his former spouse (the applicant) were divorced on 15 May 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019539

    Original file (20140019539.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 26 September 2013, by letter, DFAS responded to the applicant that a review of the FSM's retired pay account reflected the FSM did not elect former spouse SBP coverage and although the divorce decree stated she must deem the election, there is no evidence she did so. On 27 January 2014, by letter, DFAS explained that in order for the former spouse to be eligible for the SBP annuity, the member would have to request in writing to change the SBP election from spouse to former spouse or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019162

    Original file (20090019162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the FSM's record that shows he submitted a request to DFAS to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage or that the applicant requested a deemed election within 1 year of their divorce. c. A letter from DFAS Retired and Annuity Pay, dated 30 June 2009, informed the applicant her request for former spouse coverage to be deemed was received in excess of the 1-year period following the date of the court order awarding her SBP coverage. There is no documentary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000247

    Original file (20100000247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant and Executrix of the FSM's estate contend the FSM's records should be corrected to show he participated in the SBP with former spouse coverage because the final judgment of the divorce decree awarded the applicant the FSM's SBP as a former spouse and the FSM attempted to notify DFAS of this on several occasions. d. Thus, the evidence of record shows that neither the FSM nor the applicant took the necessary action to change the FSM's SBP election from spouse to former spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010612

    Original file (20080010612.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of her former spouse, a retired former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he timely filed a request with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse in accordance with the Final Decree of Divorce granted by the 27th District Court of Lampasas County, Texas. Her request was denied on 28 March 1996 because it was not timely filed within one year of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010076

    Original file (20080010076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the FSM, while still married to the applicant, elected SBP spouse coverage at a reduced amount, prior to his retirement. After retirement, he and the applicant were divorced. Their divorce decree did not obligate the FSM to change SBP coverage from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage; nevertheless, he continued to pay SBP premiums after the divorce and until his death, a period of nearly 5 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001462

    Original file (20110001462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record shows at the time of the applicant's retirement, he completed an SBP election form wherein he elected SBP former spouse coverage based on a settlement agreement that was incorporated into his divorce decree. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018252

    Original file (20130018252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse. Since there is no current spouse with a vested interest, it would be appropriate as a matter of equity to correct the FSM's records to show he requested to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse within one year of his divorce and this election was timely received and processed by DFAS,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007878

    Original file (20060007878.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060007878 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that DFAS had failed to notify him on the specifics of what was needed to continue SBP for his former spouse. It appears neither the applicant nor the former spouse requested that his SBP spouse...