Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015433
Original file (20090015433.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
		BOARD DATE:	  18 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090015433 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). 

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his former spouse is entitled to Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that in 2005 his attorney provided the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) the required paperwork to begin the process of ensuring his former spouse was covered by the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act (USFSPA) and the SBP as mandated by their divorce decree.  He states that upon learning that his former spouse was still listed as his spouse by DFAS, he submitted a DD Form 2656-1 (Former Spouse Coverage Form) and submitted it to DFAS, London, Kentucky.  Finally, he states that on 21 September 2008 he received notification from DFAS that his request for former spouse SBP had been denied because neither he nor his spouse deemed election within 1 year of the dissolution of their marriage and his SBP payments were being refunded.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his separation and property settlement agreement; dissolution of marriage decree; DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 20 June 1997; and a letter from DFAS Retired and Annuity Pay Branch in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Records available to the Board indicate the applicant and his former spouse were married on 15 March 1956.  He entered military service in the Regular Army on 5 March 1955 and served continuously until his retirement for length of service on 1 January 1977.  The applicant apparently elected spouse SBP at that time.

2.  On 10 January 2005, a judgment of dissolution was ordered.  The applicant's separation and property settlement agreement, dated 3 November 2004, shows on page 4 that he and his former spouse agreed to make an election of an annuity under the SBP and the applicant agreed to execute any documents necessary to make or extend the election of his former spouse as beneficiary.

3.  The applicant submitted a copy of a DA Form 2656-1, dated 21 July 2008, showing he requested a change in election coverage due to divorce from spouse to former spouse.

4.  On 27 September 2008, DFAS Retired and Annuity Pay Branch notified the applicant by letter to tell him an adjustment was being made in the SBP portion of his retired pay based on receipt of his divorce decree.  The memorandum from DFAS also explained to the applicant that neither he nor his former spouse deemed former spouse coverage within 1 year of the divorce and he was due a refund of overpaid SBP premiums from the first month after his divorce through the current work month.

5.  The applicant submitted an electronic mail message, dated 2 May 2010, that states he has not remarried.

6.  Public Law 97-252, the USFSPA, enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

7.  Public Law 98-94 enacted 24 September 1983 established former spouse coverage for retired members.

8.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or had not yet made an SBP election.

9.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  As part of the divorce settlement agreement, the applicant was required to elect SBP coverage for his former spouse.  He states he provided DFAS with a copy of his divorce decree and to date has not remarried; however, DFAS maintains the applicant did not notify them within 1 year of the divorce of his election for former spouse coverage as required by the SBP statute.

2.  Although he did not notify DFAS in a timely manner, he continued to pay SBP premiums.  Because there are no other parties in whom the SBP has vested interest, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice, compassion, and equity to grant the requested relief.

3.  There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant's intent was to change the SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" and, as such, his record should be corrected to show he did so and that his request was received and processed by DFAS in a timely manner.  DFAS should recoup the previously refunded SBP premiums from the effective date of the divorce decree, 10 January 2005.

BOARD VOTE:

__x______  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the applicant made a request for a change to former spouse SBP coverage within 1 year of his divorce and that DFAS effected the change and


	b.  by advising the applicant that DFAS will be instructed to collect any SBP costs due as a result of this correction.



      _________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015433



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001910

    Original file (20070001910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he remarried and added his present spouse as his SBP beneficiary in 2005, DFAS dropped the SBP election. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, filed 13 December 2002; a copy of their Marital Settlement Agreement, dated 9 October 2002; a copy of a letter the applicant wrote to DFAS, Subject: Correct My Mistake, dated 16 June 2006; a copy of a DD Form 2656-9, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and Reserve Component Survivor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028423

    Original file (20100028423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage or reinstatement of his former spouse's SBP coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the former spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019162

    Original file (20090019162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the FSM's record that shows he submitted a request to DFAS to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage or that the applicant requested a deemed election within 1 year of their divorce. c. A letter from DFAS Retired and Annuity Pay, dated 30 June 2009, informed the applicant her request for former spouse coverage to be deemed was received in excess of the 1-year period following the date of the court order awarding her SBP coverage. There is no documentary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005777C070208

    Original file (20040005777C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040005777 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001462

    Original file (20110001462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record shows at the time of the applicant's retirement, he completed an SBP election form wherein he elected SBP former spouse coverage based on a settlement agreement that was incorporated into his divorce decree. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009327

    Original file (20150009327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 and a DD Form 2656-1 wherein he elected to participate in the SBP for former spouse and children coverage pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily as part of divorce proceedings and incorporated in a court order. The divorce proceedings do not compel the applicant to provide SBP coverage for his former spouse. Although the applicant indicated on the forms that he entered into a written agreement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009432

    Original file (20080009432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no indication that the applicant informed DFAS of the dissolution of his marriage or made an election to change SBP coverage from “spouse" to “former spouse" within one year of the date of the dissolution of his marriage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000889

    Original file (20130000889.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse. The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 16 September 1999. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002215

    Original file (20080002215.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show that he established former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for his former spouse within the 1-year period required by his divorce decree. The applicant states, in effect, that he was divorced on 7 April 2005 and in February 2006, he submitted his DD Form 2656-1 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage) along with his divorce decree to the DFAS. Public Law 99-661, dated 14...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013522

    Original file (20140013522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from former spouse to spouse coverage. On 14 July 2014, the applicant and Sallie were married and on 28 July 2014, he submitted a DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Certificate Change) to DFAS. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage...