Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019162
Original file (20090019162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    27 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090019162 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he filed a deemed election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within 1 year of the court order awarding her the coverage. 

2.  The applicant states the following:

     a.  There was no reference made to providing a copy of a divorce decree to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in any of the pre-retirement briefings she attended with her husband.

     b.  During retirement out-processing the FSM named her as the beneficiary of his SBP annuity.  No reference was made to providing DFAS a copy of the divorce decree within 1 year in the event of a divorce. 

     c.  An e-mail from the FSM indicates the applicant is still the beneficiary of his SBP annuity and that there was a lack of knowledge of the requirement to provide a copy of the divorce decree to DFAS within 1 year.

     d.  The applicant contacted the Fort Lewis Retirement Services Office and was mailed a DD Form 2293 (Application for Former Spouse Payments from Retired Pay).  She completed the form and sent it to DFAS.  



     e.  On 30 June 2009, the applicant received correspondence from DFAS denying her request for former spouse coverage.  She requested advice on the appeals process and did not receive a response.  

     f.  The Fort Lewis Retirement Services Office recommended she appeal to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).

3.  The applicant provides the following:

* an e-mail from the FSM dated 21 April 2009
* a copy of a completed DD Form 2293
* copies of correspondence between the applicant and DFAS
* an Army Retirement Services summary of the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act
* the applicant's divorce decree
* the applicant's marital property settlement agreement
* a copy of a completed DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel)
* an e-mail stating the FSM has not remarried dated 
21 May 2010

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The record shows the applicant married the FSM on 1 September 1979.

2.  After a period of active service in the U. S. Air Force, the FSM attended Officer Candidate School and he was appointed as a second lieutenant in the Army.  He entered active duty on 27 July 1979.   

3.  In January 2004, the FSM submitted a request for voluntary retirement.  In connection with his request, he completed a DD Form 2656 and indicated that he was married and had dependent children.  He further elected spouse and children SBP coverage with a reduced base amount.  The applicant and the FSM certified the election with their signatures on the form.

4.  The FSM was honorably retired on 31 December 2004, in the rank of colonel.

5.  On 7 June 2007, the applicant and the FSM entered into a marital property settlement agreement wherein he agreed to pay the premiums for SBP and list the applicant as the beneficiary.  The parties' 19 June 2007 dissolution of marriage incorporated the terms of the property settlement.

6.  There is no evidence in the FSM's record that shows he submitted a request to DFAS to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage or that the applicant requested a deemed election within 1 year of their divorce.

7.  The applicant submits the following:

     a.  An e-mail from the FSM, dated 21 April 2009, in which he indicates the applicant did not submit the divorce decree to DFAS within 
1 year of the divorce.  This e-mail also indicates his monthly statement had not changed to reflect the divorce and that he tried to make the necessary changes but he learned DFAS needed the information from the applicant.

     b.  A letter written to DFAS, dated 13 May 2009, shows the applicant indicated that she did not know she needed to submit a copy of the divorce decree within 
1 year of the divorce.  She also provided DFAS an application for former spouse payments and a copy of the divorce decree.  

     c.  A letter from DFAS Retired and Annuity Pay, dated 30 June 2009, informed the applicant her request for former spouse coverage to be deemed was received in excess of the 1-year period following the date of the court order awarding her SBP coverage.  The letter further informed her SBP coverage would not be implemented because the statutory filing deadline had expired.

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.

9.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (to include Reservists).

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the FSM's record should be corrected to show she filed an application for former spouse SBP coverage to be deemed within 
1 year of the court order awarding her the coverage is supported by the facts and circumstances of this case.

2.  The available evidence shows prior to retirement in 2004, the FSM elected spouse and children SBP coverage with a reduced base amount.  The applicant and the FSM were divorced on 19 June 2007.  The settlement agreement stipulated the FSM would pay the SBP premiums and list the applicant as the beneficiary.  

3.  There is no documentary evidence showing the applicant submitted the necessary forms to change the FSM's SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of the divorce.  However, there is evidence the FSM attempted to make changes and he was informed by DFAS the applicant should submit the request.  

4.  Although the applicant's request for a former spouse deemed election was not made within 1 year of the divorce a court had ordered the former spouse coverage.  In addition, it appears the FSM desires to honor the terms of the divorce.  As a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to correct the records to show the applicant timely requested a deemed election as a former spouse, especially since the FSM has not remarried and no one has an interest in SBP superior to that of the applicant.  

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  __X_____  __X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed a timely request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage under the SBP.




      ________X____________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019162



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019162



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003783

    Original file (20090003783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 September 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003783 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 8 August 2008, the applicant submitted a letter to DFAS Military Retired Pay Office explaining that she was finally receiving retired pay and was making a deemed election to keep the SBP for the start date of her divorce. As part of the divorce settlement agreement, the FSM was required to elect SBP coverage for his former spouse; however, the FSM did not notify DFAS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064691C070421

    Original file (2001064691C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states, through counsel, that the FSM and the applicant were granted a divorce on 16 November 1995. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017575

    Original file (20130017575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record shows that the FSM elected SBP spouse only coverage at the time of his retirement. As the FSM had elected spouse coverage at the time he retired and he was married at the time of his death, his widow...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030020

    Original file (20100030020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011972

    Original file (20140011972.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show a deemed election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). (4) If her divorce decree specifies that she was to be designated as a former spouse beneficiary for the SBP, she must take action to make a "deemed election for SBP" coverage within 1 year of the date of divorce or other court order requiring SBP coverage for her directly to the Retired Pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002749C070206

    Original file (20050002749C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: Counsel states the FSM and the applicant were married for 25 years and divorced on 27 February 2001. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The separation agreement awarded the applicant 50 percent of the FSM's retired pay and stated she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019282

    Original file (20130019282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired, and now deceased, former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity. On 13 December 2012, by letter, DFAS officials notified the applicant that in order for a former spouse to be eligible for an SBP the member would have to request in writing to change the SBP election from spouse to former spouse, or the divorce decree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017318

    Original file (20130017318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter dated 4 June 2012, DFAS advised the applicant that their records did not show that the FSM had ever requested to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse. The applicant contends, in effect, that the records of the FSM should be corrected to show he changed his SBP election from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage and to pay her an SBP annuity. The applicant did not request an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made within one year of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026946

    Original file (20100026946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that when the FSM retired in 2006, he elected SBP for spouse coverage. In 2008, the FSM and the applicant were divorced. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of their divorce in February 2008; b. showing his request was timely received and processed by the appropriate DFAS office; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015756

    Original file (20130015756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests correction of the record of the applicant's former spouse, a retired service member (SM), to show a deemed election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. No timely deemed election of...