Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001462
Original file (20110001462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110001462 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for former spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states he and his former spouse divorced in 2003.  The divorce directed him to name her as his SBP beneficiary with the costs of the insurance to be paid by her and when he retired he accordingly made the election per the court order.  He recently spoke to her and found out she never wanted the SBP insurance and believed she did not have the option to decline.  The intent with the language in their settlement agreement was to commit him to naming her as the SBP beneficiary so she would have a choice whether or not to accept it; the intent was not to bind her to taking it.  He further stated that he wants to terminate the SBP completely and he does not want to change it to spouse coverage.

3.  The applicant provides:

* A settlement agreement
* A divorce decree
* Two statements from his former spouse
* A page titled SBP Questionnaire
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel)




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as a U.S. Army Reserve officer and executed an oath of office on 28 January 1993.  He retired on 31 May 2008.  Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) records show that at that time he enrolled in the SBP for former spouse coverage beginning on 1 June 2008.

2.  He and his former spouse were married on 1 August 1987.  On 31 January 2003, the applicant and his former spouse entered into a settlement agreement wherein it states, in pertinent part, that "When [the applicant] retires, he shall name wife as his SBP beneficiary and the cost of the SBP insurance will be paid by the wife."

3.  On 16 April 2003, he and his former spouse were divorced.  The final judgment of dissolution of marriage approved and incorporated the marital settlement agreement that awarded the former spouse the SBP.

4.  The applicant provides a DD Form 2656, dated 16 January 2008, wherein he elected SBP former spouse coverage.  He indicated his election was being made pursuant to a written agreement entered into voluntarily as part of a proceeding of divorce and incorporated in a court order.

5.  The applicant also provides a statement from his former spouse, dated 6 January 2011, wherein she states she is the beneficiary of her former spouse's SBP and she is requesting the SBP coverage be terminated.  She also states if the request is approved she understands she may not opt for the SBP in the future and there will be no reimbursement for premiums paid to date.

6.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

7.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

9.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows at the time of the applicant's retirement, he completed an SBP election form wherein he elected SBP former spouse coverage based on a settlement agreement that was incorporated into his divorce decree.  As his election was mandated by a court order, there was no requirement for his former spouse to be notified of his election, and there was no option for her to accept or decline the election.  

2.  Retirees have a 1-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from the SBP by submitting the appropriate request to DFAS - Retired Pay.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll from the program.  The applicant's 1-year period to withdraw from the SBP commenced on 1 June 2010 and ended on 31 May 2011.

3.  The applicant's request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to withdraw from the SBP for former spouse was dated 3 January 2011 and received by the ABCMR on 20 January 2011.  His request includes his former spouse's statement agreeing to the termination of the SBP.  Therefore, as a matter of equity it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he requested to withdraw from the SBP for former spouse coverage on 1 June 2010 with entitlement to reimbursement of the SBP premiums paid from that date.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__X_____  ____X___  ____X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by  showing the applicant withdrew from the SBP for former spouse coverage on 1 June 2010.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the correction of his records to show he declined the SBP former spouse coverage at the time of his retirement.



      _________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001462





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110001462



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005569

    Original file (20120005569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel argues that: * T____ was the beneficiary of the SBP when the FSM retired through the date of the divorce; she was never deleted as the SBP beneficiary * The FSM made contact with DFAS and OPM to change the SBP designation to former spouse coverage; OPM complied but DFAS did not * The FSM believed no additional documentation was needed and as such, continued to pay monthly premiums until he was paid up * The Board has previously granted relief, directly or indirectly, in multiple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019417

    Original file (20140019417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. On 25 March 1987, the FSM and applicant were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010076

    Original file (20080010076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the FSM, while still married to the applicant, elected SBP spouse coverage at a reduced amount, prior to his retirement. After retirement, he and the applicant were divorced. Their divorce decree did not obligate the FSM to change SBP coverage from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage; nevertheless, he continued to pay SBP premiums after the divorce and until his death, a period of nearly 5 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003862

    Original file (20090003862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he timely elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Evidence shows that the applicant's current spouse Mildred divorced a retired FSM. Evidence of record shows that at the time of the applicant retirement, he was married to Maria and opted to enroll in SBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019282

    Original file (20130019282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired, and now deceased, former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity. On 13 December 2012, by letter, DFAS officials notified the applicant that in order for a former spouse to be eligible for an SBP the member would have to request in writing to change the SBP election from spouse to former spouse, or the divorce decree...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003265C070205

    Original file (20060003265C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She states that they were legally separated on 7 November 1977 and the decision to conclude with a divorce was made in March 1980 prior to the FSM’s retirement. He should not have been paying SBP premiums from on or about 10 June 1980, when they divorced, until 24 September 1983, when former spouse coverage for retired members was established. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019539

    Original file (20140019539.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 26 September 2013, by letter, DFAS responded to the applicant that a review of the FSM's retired pay account reflected the FSM did not elect former spouse SBP coverage and although the divorce decree stated she must deem the election, there is no evidence she did so. On 27 January 2014, by letter, DFAS explained that in order for the former spouse to be eligible for the SBP annuity, the member would have to request in writing to change the SBP election from spouse to former spouse or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024111

    Original file (20110024111.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 15 July 1977, the applicant and FSM completed a settlement agreement in the Superior Court for the County of Whitfield and State of Georgia which stipulated, in pertinent part, that the FSM currently made payments on an annuity contract (SBP) whereby a percentage of his monthly retirement pay from the United States Government would continue at his death unto the applicant and the minor children of the marriage. In view of the foregoing and given there is no current spouse beneficiary, it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004653C070206

    Original file (20050004653C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. It is reasonable to presume his continuing to pay [spouse] SBP premiums for almost 20 years after the divorce indicated his intention to provide the SBP for the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018395

    Original file (20080018395.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She also provides a letter from the FSM, dated 1 October 2008, in which he confirms that it was and is his intent that his former spouse (the applicant) continue to be the beneficiary of his SBP, and a letter from her counsel, dated 6 October 200, in which he indicates that a copy of the applicant’s Final Judgment was sent to DFAS in order that she receive her portion of the FSM’s military retirement benefits and to ensure that she would be listed as beneficiary of the SBP benefits. Public...