Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026390
Original file (20100026390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026390 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a medical retirement.

2.  The applicant states:

* He should have been medically retired from the Army instead of chaptered out
* He has several medical conditions that were caused by his time/service in the Army
* Getting chaptered out with no disability or severance pay is unjust
* He was discharged from the Army under chapter 5-17 for anxiety and depression which were caused by the funeral details he performed
* He already had a severe case of obstructive sleep apnea and was going through the disability process
* His chain of command stopped the medical board process and chaptered him out under paragraph 5-17 so he wouldn't get any severance pay from the Army
* They told him this verbally 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Service personnel records
* Medical records
* Emails  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 July 2008 for a period of 3 years and 
17 weeks.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Cannon Crewmember).

2.  In March 2009, he was diagnosed with sleep apnea.  Later that year he was flagged at SRP [Soldier Readiness Processing] because he did not meet criteria for deployment to CENTCOM AOR [U.S. Central Command Area of Responsibility].  

3.  He was referred to a Medical Evaluation Board but this was discontinued by the Chief of Pulmonary Medicine.  He was adequately controlled with CPAP [Continuous Positive Airway Pressure] and met retention requirements.  The Chief of Pulmonary Medicine changed his profile from a permanent "3" to a permanent "2" for sleep apnea in May 2009.  Because of a complaint of excessive daytime somnolence, he was referred for evaluation by a different sleep study center.  The findings at that time (January 2010) were not as severe as previously documented.  His CPAP setting was decreased.  Additionally, his apnea hypopnia index was within the range that was waivable for deployment to CENTRCOM AOR.  His prior compliance with earlier treatment was questioned and he was asked to provide a download of his monitoring.  Although this was discussed on more than one occasion, there is no evidence he provided this evidence he was compliant with treatment. 

4.  Service records indicate he had depression prior to entry.  The record shows he was not unfit due to depression.  He took medications sporadically.  His mental status evaluation, dated 30 November 2009, states his depression "does not rise to level that would render this Soldier unfit for continued service …"  it also states "there is no psychiatric disease or defect which warrants disposition through medical channels." 

5.  A memorandum from the Lead Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Officer, at Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, Fort Hood, TX, dated 13 July 2010, states the Medical Retention Determination Point Review on the applicant was terminated.  The memorandum indicates the applicant's behavioral health condition was inadvertently started by "R&R" and it should have been a chapter 
5 since he had the condition prior to joining the Army.  The memorandum also states his secondary condition (sleep apnea) was considered "to be fit for duty" and he was deployable.   

6.  The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge action are not contained in the available records.  
7.  The mental status evaluation conducted prior to his separation is not available. 

8.  His discharge proceedings state he was diagnosed with a depressive disorder on 30 July 2010.

9.  On 10 August 2010, he was notified of his pending separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, for other designated physical or mental conditions.  His unit commander cited that he had been diagnosed with a depressive disorder on 30 July 2010 and the extent of the condition was so severe his ability to function affectively in a military environment was significantly impaired.

10.  On 13 August 2010, his unit commander initiated action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17.  

11.  On 18 August 2010, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed the issuance of an honorable discharge.  

12.  On 31 August 2010, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of a physical condition, not a disability.  He had completed 2 years, 1 month, and 29 days of creditable active service.  

13.  He provides numerous medical records pertaining to his sleep apnea condition. 

14.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members on the basis of other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability that potentially interfere with assignment to or performance of duty.  Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, chronic airsickness or seasickness, enuresis, sleepwalking, dyslexia, severe nightmares, claustrophobia, and other disorders manifesting disturbances of perception, thinking, emotional control or behavior sufficiently severe that the Soldier’s ability to effectively perform military duties is significantly impaired.

15.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He contends he should have been medically retired from the Army.  However, he did not have an unfitting condition when he was separated for a condition, not a disability.  

2.  His depression was manageable and was noted to meet retention standards.  He had a permanent "2" profile for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.  His sleep apnea met retention standards and was within parameters that would allow deployment to CENTCOM AOR (Iraq, Afghanistan).  Therefore, there is no basis for a medical retirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026390



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026390



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00098

    Original file (PD2009-00098.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the back condition (rated 10%) and OSA (rated 0%) as unfitting. The neurology addendum and the MEB physical, both within two months of the VA examination, documented a normal gait. Other Conditions .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-03859

    Original file (PD-2014-03859.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the case file was reviewed regarding unfavorable diagnosis change, fitness determination, applicability of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.129, and rating of the MH condition adjudicated as not unfitting. Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements; a disability rating IAW the VASRD and based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended.The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00867

    Original file (PD2013 00867.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 24 January 2007 clinic record entry reflected the CI reported medication was working well for his headaches but had recurred when he ran out of medication.At a VA C&P examination, dated 23 July 2007, 5 months after separation, the CI reported two headaches per week, but added that he was not incapacitated by headaches, and had lost “no time from work due to headache.”The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB found the headaches unfitting...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00787

    Original file (PD 2012 00787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Moderate To Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Requiring Nightly Use of CPAP Condition. In consideration of this evidence, and IAW DODI 6040.44, the Board must recommend a separation rating of 50% for the OSA condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01360

    Original file (PD-2013-01360.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB examination of the lungs and heart was normal.The permanent profile listed “obstructive lung disease.”The commander’s statement indicated that the CI’s required use of a CPAP device for his “obstructive lung disease” and his “numerous health problems” made him unfit for duty.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) respiratory examination,4 months after separation, the CI reported his OSA. The CI was not diagnosed with a specific obstructive or restrictive lung disease by the PEBand...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00671

    Original file (PD2011-00671.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that the CI was not using CPAP at the time of the separation. After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was not appropriate under the guidelines of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The diagnosis in his finding of unfitness for Obstructive Sleep Apnea, VASRD code...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00768

    Original file (PD2011-00768.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army CASE NUMBER: PD1100768 SEPARATION DATE: 20041010 BOARD DATE: 20120209 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (92G, Food Service Specialist), medically separated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In the matter of the obsutructive sleep apnea condition, the Board unanimously recommend a permanent service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00939

    Original file (BC-2002-00939.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Medical Consultant noted that shortly following his discharge from the Air Force, the applicant separated from his wife and applied to the DVA for disability compensation for his various medical problems. He sleeps a lot during the day since he is not able to sleep well during the night and claimed that he has severe sleep apnea. He now requests that he be medically retired from the Air Force as of the date of his separation on 26 Jul 99, contending that he was suffering from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007076C070206

    Original file (20050007076C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DVA is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service in awarding a disability rating, only that a medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned. The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show the CPAP machine does not resolve his sleep apnea condition nor has he provided sufficient evidence to show he was physically unable to perform his duties while he was in the Army. However, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01310

    Original file (PD2012 01310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    From the time the Medical Evaluation Board conducted their exam on 4/8/2003 to the time they rendered their decision on 6/16/2003 there were additional medical conditions identified on a physical exam on 5/22/203 that were no [sic] considered. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Allergic Rhinitis, with Polyps or Obstruction(Includes: Severe Allergies, Upper Airway Resistant Syndrome and Refractory Allergic Rhinitis)65220%Chronic Rhinitis Upper Airway Resistant...