Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013255
Original file (20100013255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013255 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that she served as a medical specialist 6 years and 6 months instead of 6 years and 2 months as currently reflected.

2.  The applicant states that she served as a medical specialist 6 years and 6 months instead of the 6 years and 2 months reflected on her DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 May 1980 for a period of 4 years.  She completed her basic training at Fort McClellan, Alabama and was transferred to Fort Sam Houston, Texas to undergo her advanced individual training (AIT) as a medical specialist.  She was transferred to Fort Sill Oklahoma in September 1980 to undergo additional training as a patient care specialist.

3.  She was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 March 1982 and served until 13 November 1986, when she was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8, due to pregnancy.  She had served
6 years, 6 months, and 1 day of total active service and her DD Form 214 shows she held military occupational specialty (MOS) 91A (Medical Specialist) 6 years and 2 months, which is the amount of time she served after being awarded the MOS (graduation from AIT). 

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the 
DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that for the computation of time served in an MOS, time spent in basic training and advanced individual training (AIT) will not be included.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that her DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect that she served in her primary MOS 6 years and 6 months (her entire period of service) has been noted and found to lack merit.

2.  The applicant was not awarded her MOS until after she had been in the military approximately 4 months, which was after she had completed basic training and AIT.  Accordingly, the entry showing that she served as a medical specialist 6 years and 2 months coincides with her graduation from AIT and there appears to be no basis to change her DD Form 214 to show otherwise.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of her service in arms.




      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013255



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013255



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017398

    Original file (20080017398.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel record to show she was again ordered to active duty for training on 5 December 2001, the date that corresponds to the date entered active duty currently shown on her DD Form 214. Item 35 of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows the applicant was released from her AIT and returned to her parent unit on 17 July 2001; however, there is no evidence a DD Form 214 was prepared to document the completion of her IADT and her release from this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008481

    Original file (20100008481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect that she was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-4 and that it reflect all of her service. The applicant states her DD Form 214 only reflects her service during basic training and does not reflect the fact that she served her enlistment and was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-4. The DD Form 214 dated 18 August 1990 was prepared to reflect her release...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008322C070208

    Original file (20040008322C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 11 (Primary Specialty) and Item 14 (Military Education) of her 26 October 2002 separation document (DD Form 214). The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: DD Form 214, Discharge Orders, Statement for Enlistment (DA Form 3286-63), United States Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) Form 978 (Continuation of Remarks, DA Form 4187), and Enlistment Contract (DD Form 4) with associated documents. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087042C070212

    Original file (2003087042C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her application, she submits a copy of her diploma from the MOS 63G Fuel and Electrical Systems Repair Course, and her separation document (DD Form 214). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Although the applicant provides a document that indicates she completed the requirements of the Fuel and Electrical Systems Repair Course, the record confirms she was discharged by reason of pregnancy prior to initial assignment and never performed MOS 63G duties in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087826C070212

    Original file (2003087826C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDARSUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDEDTYPE OF DISCHARGE(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)DATE OF DISCHARGEDISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR DISCHARGE REASONBOARD DECISION(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)REVIEW AUTHORITYISSUES 1.2.3.4.5.6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006785C070205

    Original file (20060006785C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she was never in the U.S. Army Reserve and that her reserve obligation date in item 12i, of her DD Form 214, should be removed and that she was serving in pay grade E-3 prior to her release from active duty. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 6 August 1982, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, paragraph 5-31, EPD, in pay grade E-2, with transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025917

    Original file (20100025917.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She completed training as a medical specialist and was transferred to Fort Devens, Massachusetts, for assignment to a combat support hospital. On 17 April 1989, the applicant's commander notified her that he was initiating action to discharge her from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, due to a diagnosed personality disorder. Personnel discharged by reason of a personality disorder under the provisions of paragraph 5-13 are issued a separation code...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010680

    Original file (20140010680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "10 months" instead of "zero." She was ordered to and entered on active duty training (ADT) on 30 April 2013. The mere fact she completed training and was awarded MOS 25B does not mean item 18 will show the amount of months she trained for the MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001775

    Original file (20110001775.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The same regulation states to list in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service in item 14 of the DD Form 214. Her request to have MOS 91C added to item 11 and the Practical Nurse Course to item 14 of her DD Form 214 was carefully considered. Both conversion periods were prior to the applicant’s retirement from the Army and accordingly, her MOS was converted during each period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012130

    Original file (20100012130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – master sergeant (MSG) or lieutenant colonel (LTC) * Item 4b (Pay Grade) – E8 or O5 * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) – 21 Years and 9 Months * Item 12 (Record of Service) o section a. The applicant's DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 27 June 1979, shows she enlisted in the U.S. Army...